Waiting Lists Unreported Removals
2026-06-09
TAGS
Response quality
Questions & Answers
Q1
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The Conservative MP is questioning the government's assessment of trends in unreported removals from NHS waiting lists, suggesting that these numbers may be manipulated.
What assessment has been made of trends in the level of unreported removals from waiting lists?
Over 85% of waiting list removals are made as a result of patient care, and since the end of the pandemic, unreported removals have been below pre-pandemic levels. Record levels of elective activity are being delivered by NHS staff, enabling us to cut waiting lists and meet our interim target of 65% of patients being seen within 18 weeks—the highest performance in over four years.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The answer does not specifically address the trend analysis requested but rather gives general information about waiting list removals.
Gave General Statistics Without Addressing The Specific Ask
Response accuracy
Q2
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The MP is concerned about potential manipulation of NHS waiting lists, referencing the previous Labour Government's record.
People in Beverley and Holderness want high-quality and speedy care, not massaged waiting list numbers that suit Labour narratives. The last Labour Government repeatedly found manipulated numbers regarding waiting lists. Can she reassure people in Beverley and Holderness that we will have genuinely improved healthcare rather than widespread manipulation?
If anyone has forgotten, the last Labour Government left the NHS in a better state than it was under successive Governments. The point that the Conservatives seem to be intent on following up forever is an important one. Some 85% of the activity is a result of direct patient care. Validation, both clinical and clerical, is a long-standing routine practice of waiting list management. At roughly 15%, it is no different now from what it has been before.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The answer does not specifically address the questioner's request for reassurance about avoiding manipulation but instead focuses on defending against accusations.
Defended Previous Government Actions
Used Hedging Language
Response accuracy
Q3
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The MP is concerned that the current statistic on GP referral to first treatment does not capture all aspects of patient care, particularly for those needing subsequent follow-up care.
While reducing waiting lists for GP referral to first treatment is appreciated, such statistics do not capture the entire picture, especially for patients requiring follow-up care. Could she say a little about any plans to capture these waiting lists?
We do not have any plans to add new targets, but we understand the way waiting lists are managed and aim to support patients in understanding their treatment pathway. Part of our commitment is that patients are kept up to date about where they are being treated and why they might be referred to a more local service.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The answer does not provide specific plans but acknowledges the importance of follow-up care waiting lists.
Did Not Commit To New Targets
Response accuracy
Q4
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The MP is questioning the government's practices regarding patients being removed from NHS waiting lists without receiving treatment.
Last month, the Health Service Journal reported that the elective waiting list target was met largely because a record number of patients were removed in March. Can the Minister tell how many patients were removed and what happened to them?
As I have said, patients are referred to a waiting list but then left for years under previous management. We ensure that there is adequate validation of the lists and that patients receive care as needed, often closer to home. Patients are getting the right care in the right place.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The answer does not provide specific figures or detailed information on patient removals.
Defended Previous Management
Used General Statements
Response accuracy
Q5
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The MP is concerned about a large number of patients being removed from NHS waiting lists without treatment, questioning the government's transparency.
It is not just Conservatives who are raising this issue; it is also patients and the Health Service Journal. Can the Minister commit to a review to find out what has happened to those 350,000 patients?
This is an established way of managing waiting lists and we have committed to greater transparency. We will continue providing data, which shows that validation of the lists is standard practice and that figures remain consistent over years.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The answer does not commit to a specific review as requested but provides general information on practices.
Used Hedging Language
Response accuracy