Questions & Answers
Q1
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The MP raises concerns about the adequacy of healthcare provision specifically targeting male demographics, highlighting issues such as barriers to access and poor health outcomes.
What assessment has been made of the adequacy of the provision of health services for men?
Too many men lead too much of their lives in poor health and face barriers to access to health services. We have published England's first ever men's health strategy to get men speaking about their physical and mental health, and we are getting on with implementing it. From partnering with the Premier League to investing in the men's health community fund, we are meeting men where they are, and helping them to lead longer, healthier lives.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Specific assessment of adequacy of provision for men's health services
We Have Published A Strategy But Did Not Provide Specific Details On Its Effectiveness Or The Extent Of Inadequacies
Response accuracy
Q2
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The MP brings attention to the limitations of current screening methods for prostate cancer, as highlighted by NHS and Prostate Cancer UK. The issue pertains to delayed detection due to inadequate symptoms recognition in early stages.
The NHS itself says that prostate cancer often has no symptoms at first, and Prostate Cancer UK says most men with early prostate cancer have no symptoms at all. The Government's TRANSFORM trial exists because current detection methods are recognised as inadequate. Why does Government messaging still point men towards early symptoms that they are unlikely to have, while cancers that could be cured are becoming cancers that cannot?
Let me be really clear in my advice to any man who is worried about prostate cancer, whether he has symptoms or not: go and discuss it with your GP. Testing is available when GPs recommend it, and I would recommend to no man that he should worry about it in silence, sit at home and fret about what might be going on. The wider, targeted screening programme to which the Government have agreed is based on the evidence from weighing up the benefits of screening versus the harm that it can cause. We know that, at present, if cancerous cells are identified and treatment follows—for example, removal of the prostate—it leads to permanent urinary incontinence in 20% of cases and in two thirds of cases to permanent erectile dysfunction.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Specific reasons for directing men towards symptom-based screening despite inadequate methods
Advising Gps On Testing Without Addressing The Issue Of Symptom-Based Messaging
Response accuracy