← Back to House of Commons Debates

Thirlwall Inquiry Terms of Reference

16 July 2026

Lead MP

David Davis

Debate Type

Adjournment Debate

Tags

NHS
Other Contributors: 1

At a Glance

David Davis raised concerns about thirlwall inquiry terms of reference in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Opened the debate
The MP raised serious concerns about the Lucy Letby case, highlighting institutional self-preservation over justice. He discussed the Thirlwall inquiry's narrow scope and called for a broader examination of staffing crises, poor clinical management, and environmental risks. Davis emphasised that systemic NHS failures must be addressed to prevent future tragedies and miscarriages of justice. The speech detailed staff shortages, hospital contamination issues, and infections affecting newborns, calling for the inquiry to examine credible alternative hypotheses.

Government Response

NHS
Government Response
The Minister responded on behalf of the Government, expressing sympathy for families affected by the events at the Countess of Chester hospital. She highlighted that Lucy Letby’s convictions are judicial decisions and emphasised the independence of the legal process. The minister stated there is no case to amend or expand the Thirlwall inquiry's terms of reference based on current information. There is a separate CCRC review, and the Government will not intervene in this independent process. She reaffirmed that the inquiry will proceed without suspension, aiming for transparency and timely resolution. The Minister also mentioned ongoing work to support NHS leadership development and accountability through legislative measures.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About House of Commons Debates

House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.