Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Mental Health Services

Tuesday 14 April 2026 · 2 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 2 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Mental health funding will rise by 140 million in real terms this year, reaching a record 16.1 billion.
  • A constituent's son is waiting 10 months for a mental health assessment in Bicester and Woodstock.
  • The government is rolling out mental health support teams in every school by 2029 and investing 13 million for enhanced training for staff.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Calum Miller Lib Dem Bicester and Woodstock
Context

The Liberal Democrat MP is concerned about the potential impact of changes to mental health funding on access to services, especially in his constituency where families face long waits for support. He references a previous conversation with the Secretary of State 15 months ago and cites an example of a constituent whose child has waited 10 months for a mental health assessment.

Question

What assessment have you made of the potential impact of changes to the mental health investment standard on access to mental health services? In my constituency, too many families face long and distressing waits for mental health support for children and young people. A constituent recently wrote to me that her son is waiting 10 months just for an assessment for his mental health needs. She asked how parents can watch their young people suffer for a whole year before they get any help. I am worried that the revised standard will not help this problem sufficiently. Can you tell my constituents when child and adolescent mental health waiting lists will start to fall?

Answer from Zubir Ahmed

Mental health funding will rise by £140 million in real terms this year, reaching a record £16.1 billion. That is on top of capital investment of £473 million over four years to deliver new models of care and digital transformation. Early intervention for children's mental health and wellbeing is provided through rolling out mental health support teams in every school by 2029. A £13 million pilot will enhance training for staff to offer more support to young people with complex needs. The government aims to ensure that, as they digitally transform services, both children and adults can access talking therapies where necessary.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific question about when waiting lists will start to fall was not directly addressed.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q2 Calum Miller Lib Dem Bicester and Woodstock
Context

The MP raises concerns about long waits for mental health support in his constituency, highlighting a case where a child has waited 10 months for an assessment. He queries the effectiveness of the government's approach to reducing waiting times and improving access to care.

Question

In my constituency, too many families face long and distressing waits for mental health support for children and young people. A constituent recently wrote to me that her son is waiting 10 months just for an assessment for his mental health needs. She asked how parents can watch their young people suffer for a whole year before they get any help. I am worried that the revised mental health investment standard will not help this problem sufficiently. Can the Minister tell my constituents when child and adolescent mental health waiting lists will start to fall?

Answer from Zubir Ahmed

We are providing early intervention for children's mental health and wellbeing through the roll-out of mental health support teams in every school by 2029. We are investing £13 million to pilot enhanced training for staff so that they can offer more support to young people with complex needs. As we digitally transform services, both children and adults will be able to access talking therapies where required.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific question about when waiting lists will start to fall was not directly addressed.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)