← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Mental Health: Parity of Esteem
17 June 2026
Lead MP
Liz Twist
Blaydon
Lab
Responding Minister
Preet Kaur Gill
Tags
NHSTaxationMental Health
Word Count: 4163
Other Contributors: 6
At a Glance
Liz Twist raised concerns about mental health: parity of esteem in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
I ask the Minister to ensure that reducing waiting times for non-urgent community mental health care is included as a specific priority in NHS planning guidance, commit to rolling out access and waiting time standards consulted on by NHS England, outline how we will reverse the projected decline in funding for mental health over the next two years, protect the mental health investment standard until a long-term alternative plan is in place, and ensure that community mental health is a central component of the roll-out of neighbourhood health services.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
I am concerned about the devastating consequences of our failure to treat mental illness with urgency. In my constituency, I see long waits for mental health support linked to worsening symptoms and increases in self-harm and suicide attempts. The most recent figures show that almost 1.87 million adults and over 576,000 children and young people are waiting for mental health services. One-third of these patients have waited longer than 18 months for treatment. Families face impossible choices with some parents skipping meals to pay for private therapy.
Adam Dance
Con
Yeovil
Tragically, my constituent's husband took his own life in 2021 after a mental health crisis while in the care of NHS services. We need more government support and funding for access to quality mental health services in rural areas. Residents in rural Somerset are waiting 18 months to receive talking therapies, which is unacceptable.
Despite 28% of cases in the NHS being related to mental health, it receives only 13% of the funding. If we are serious about parity of esteem between physical and mental health, spending must follow the rhetoric.
Danny Beales
Con
Leominster
The hon. Member for Bath is a strong advocate for mental health in her role on the APPG, and she agrees that funding for mental health needs to keep pace with physical health care funding. The Health and Social Care Committee visited 24/7 neighbourhood mental health centre pilots and Trieste, which have been hugely successful. Can the Minister assure us that learnings from these hubs will be spread across the country with a clear roadmap for rollout?
Danny Chambers
Con
Winchester
We have a fantastic initiative in Winchester where Citizens Advice spends time with patients to help them deal with life admin, such as debt issues and money issues. Those who receive this service have shorter stays in hospital, are less likely to be readmitted, and more engaged with social services post-discharge.
We need a preventive mental health support system that is not just reactive; this includes developing systems in education to prevent people from reaching crisis.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
In Northern Ireland, we have extreme mental health issues; indeed, the figure is 25% higher than it is on the mainland. The Government must treat the nation's mental health equally and address the emotional issues among people.
Government Response
Preet Kaur Gill
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mrs Hobhouse. I am grateful to my hon. Friend the Member for Blaydon and Consett (Liz Twist) for securing this important debate, for her long-standing commitment to improving mental health services, and for her phenomenal work in her role as chair of the APPG on suicide and self-harm prevention. This debate speaks to the heart of what a modern health and care system should be, recognising that mental health has not been given the same attention or priority as physical health, with profound consequences for individuals, families, communities, and the economy (an estimated 1.26 million economically inactive due to mental health issues in 2024-25). The National Health Service Act 2006 mandates that health includes mental health; this Government are committed to parity of esteem between mental and physical health. Mental health spending for 2026-27 is forecast at a record £16.1 billion, with real-term increases in mental health investment standards. The 10-year health plan sets out our vision for neighbourhood health services, bringing care closer to people's homes and communities. We are piloting community-based health centres across England, providing round-the-clock open access treatment for adults with severe mental health needs. Significant progress has been made in building a stronger crisis care pathway, including the NHS 111 mental health option, expansion of crisis cafés, sanctuaries, and crisis houses; roll-out of crisis tech services; delivery of mental health response vehicles; full national coverage of 24/7 mental health liaison teams in acute hospitals; and investment for mental health emergency departments. The Mental Health Act 2025 modernises the legal framework to ensure people receiving treatment have greater choice, autonomy, and involvement in decisions about their care. We are developing a new cross-Government mental health strategy for England covering all ages, which will be published later this year. The Department is keen to hear views from hon. Members on how they can feed into that work. Parity of esteem is not an aspiration but a necessity; through sustained investment, service reform, and a renewed focus on prevention, particularly early prevention, we are determined to make it a reality.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.