← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Mental Health: Parity of Esteem

17 June 2026

Lead MP

Liz Twist
Blaydon
Lab

Responding Minister

Preet Kaur Gill

Tags

NHSTaxationMental Health
Word Count: 4163
Other Contributors: 6

At a Glance

Liz Twist raised concerns about mental health: parity of esteem in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

I ask the Minister to ensure that reducing waiting times for non-urgent community mental health care is included as a specific priority in NHS planning guidance, commit to rolling out access and waiting time standards consulted on by NHS England, outline how we will reverse the projected decline in funding for mental health over the next two years, protect the mental health investment standard until a long-term alternative plan is in place, and ensure that community mental health is a central component of the roll-out of neighbourhood health services.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Blaydon
Opened the debate
I am concerned about the devastating consequences of our failure to treat mental illness with urgency. In my constituency, I see long waits for mental health support linked to worsening symptoms and increases in self-harm and suicide attempts. The most recent figures show that almost 1.87 million adults and over 576,000 children and young people are waiting for mental health services. One-third of these patients have waited longer than 18 months for treatment. Families face impossible choices with some parents skipping meals to pay for private therapy.

Government Response

Preet Kaur Gill
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mrs Hobhouse. I am grateful to my hon. Friend the Member for Blaydon and Consett (Liz Twist) for securing this important debate, for her long-standing commitment to improving mental health services, and for her phenomenal work in her role as chair of the APPG on suicide and self-harm prevention. This debate speaks to the heart of what a modern health and care system should be, recognising that mental health has not been given the same attention or priority as physical health, with profound consequences for individuals, families, communities, and the economy (an estimated 1.26 million economically inactive due to mental health issues in 2024-25). The National Health Service Act 2006 mandates that health includes mental health; this Government are committed to parity of esteem between mental and physical health. Mental health spending for 2026-27 is forecast at a record £16.1 billion, with real-term increases in mental health investment standards. The 10-year health plan sets out our vision for neighbourhood health services, bringing care closer to people's homes and communities. We are piloting community-based health centres across England, providing round-the-clock open access treatment for adults with severe mental health needs. Significant progress has been made in building a stronger crisis care pathway, including the NHS 111 mental health option, expansion of crisis cafés, sanctuaries, and crisis houses; roll-out of crisis tech services; delivery of mental health response vehicles; full national coverage of 24/7 mental health liaison teams in acute hospitals; and investment for mental health emergency departments. The Mental Health Act 2025 modernises the legal framework to ensure people receiving treatment have greater choice, autonomy, and involvement in decisions about their care. We are developing a new cross-Government mental health strategy for England covering all ages, which will be published later this year. The Department is keen to hear views from hon. Members on how they can feed into that work. Parity of esteem is not an aspiration but a necessity; through sustained investment, service reform, and a renewed focus on prevention, particularly early prevention, we are determined to make it a reality.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.