Context
The question is prompted by concerns about the impact of government policies on the hospitality industry, including business rates and employment challenges. Joe Robertson highlights that there are 100,000 fewer people working in hospitality since the current government came to power.
Question
What steps his Department is taking to support the hospitality sector. What the Minister does not say is that the Government have also taxed those businesses and made it harder to employ people, which is why there are 100,000 fewer people working in hospitality since her Government came to power. Hospitality businesses in my constituency are hanging on to one thread of hope: the vague assertion that the Government will look again at valuations. Will the Minister look again right now, scrap business rates for hospitality and back our high streets?
Answer from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business and Trade (Kate Dearden)
Every high street in every corner of our country is supported by our hospitality industry. They are absolutely vital to our economy, supporting over 2 million jobs. The sector is really personal to me; my first job was in the hospitality industry, and I know that many Members across this House also have that personal connection. We are reversing the damage that Conservative Members did to our economy, and businesses still do not thank them for it. Nor do people whose wages under the previous Government simply did not give them the disposable income to spend in their local pubs, spend in their high streets and support restaurants. That is why we are reversing that, ensuring that people see a rise in their living standards, cutting costs for households and raising wages to boost and support our high streets. That is what we are absolutely focused on doing: rebalancing our economy so that it works for working people and businesses alike.
Not addressed: Did not address the specific ask about reassessing business rate valuations or scrapping business rates for hospitality
How: Changing Subject To Past Government Policies
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)