Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Industrial Energy Costs

Thursday 29 January 2026 · 2 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 2 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Nick Smith asked about industrial energy costs and levies affecting manufacturers in Blaenau Gwent and Rhymney.
  • The Minister thanked Nick Smith and mentioned that GS Yuasa Battery Manufacturing in Gwent is exempt from several renewables levies and electricity network usage costs due to the supercharger scheme.
  • Sir Alec Shelbrooke raised concerns about a Yorkshire brick company that did not qualify for the supercharger scheme due to not meeting the business level test.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Nick Smith Lab Blaenau Gwent and Rhymney
Energy
Context

The question follows the government's announcement to increase discount on electricity network charges for electricity-intensive businesses. Previous Conservative government faced criticism over soaring industrial energy costs.

Question

Under the last Conservative Government we had soaring energy costs and the highest industrial energy bills in Europe. Now, under Labour, manufacturers, including those in Blaenau Gwent and Rhymney, have seen costly levies taken out. Will the Minister please outline what else the Government can do to bring energy bills down further for UK industry?

Answer from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business and Trade (Chris McDonald)

I thank my hon. Friend for championing the businesses in his constituency. One such business, GS Yuasa Battery Manufacturing in Gwent, is receiving support from the supercharger, exempting it from several renewables levies and electricity network usage costs. This is all part of the Government’s clean energy superpower mission, which will cut costs, boost energy security and accelerate grid connections.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The Minister did not provide additional steps beyond mentioning existing support for businesses like GS Yuasa Battery Manufacturing.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q2 Alec Shelbrooke Con Wetherby and Easingwold
Energy Business & Trade
Context

A Yorkshire brick company in Sir Alec's constituency faced administration but was rescued. The current supercharger scheme does not support companies that do not meet the business level test, excluding many ceramics manufacturers.

Question

I have a fantastic Yorkshire brick company in my constituency. Unfortunately it had to go into administration, but it was rescued. As welcome as the supercharger scheme is, the problem was that the company did not qualify because it did not meet the business level test, so it did not get any Government support. Can the Government engage directly with ceramics manufacturers, which are huge users of electricity, gas and various other products, because if we export products to be made elsewhere, the carbon footprint is often much bigger than if we had made them locally?

Answer from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business and Trade (Chris McDonald)

The right hon. Gentleman knows that I share his concerns about the ceramics industry. He is quite right that many ceramics companies failed to qualify for the supercharger. There will be a review of the supercharger this year, and I have asked officials to look very carefully at the potential to include ceramics companies in it. I discussed that with the ceramics industry at an event in Parliament this week, which the right hon. Member attended—as, I think, did the Yorkshire brick company that he mentioned. I can also inform him that I and my hon. Friend the Minister for Trade will meet ceramics industries in the near future.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The Minister acknowledged concerns but did not provide immediate commitments beyond reviewing eligibility criteria.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email