Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Virtual Wards

Tuesday 21 October 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Layla Moran visited a virtual ward team at the John Radcliffe hospital.
  • The Minister acknowledged the shift towards community-based care.
  • In September 2025, there were 12,522 virtual ward beds available.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Layla Moran Lib Dem Oxford West and Abingdon
NHS
Context

The virtual ward at the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford provided exceptional care to elderly patients like Mavis, aged 91. However, funding cuts have put this service at risk of closure.

Question

Earlier this year, I visited the 'hospital at home' team at the John Radcliffe hospital who run an incredible virtual ward. I saw them deliver care to Mavis, a patient who is 91 years old; she was so emotional and grateful for their work that we all ended up in tears. Imagine my disappointment upon learning during my leave that funding for this service has been cut and the team faces closure. This is an example of the best of NHS practice. How can we ensure that such services are not only preserved but rolled out across Oxfordshire and beyond if the initial funding is insufficient?

Answer from The Minister for Care (Stephen Kinnock)

The hon. Lady makes a very valid point: this is about the shift from hospital to community, which we have to drive forward. In September 2025, 12,522 virtual ward beds were available—an increase from 12,497 in September 2024. Slowly but surely, we are increasing the number of virtual ward beds and the capability of virtual wards, but there is still a long way to go. I absolutely accept the point that the hon. Lady makes.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific funding commitments for nascent services like the John Radcliffe Hospital's 'hospital at home' team were not provided

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)