Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Employer’s National Insurance: GPs

Tuesday 21 October 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Ministerial funding for general practice has increased by 1.1 billion.
  • The additional funding has enabled the recruitment of 2,000 extra GPs.
  • A new contract for general practice has been agreed for the first time in four years.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Katie Lam Con Weald of Kent
NHS
Context

GPs in the Weald of Kent, including Woodchurch and Charing, struggle with rising staff costs. The National Insurance increase from last year's Budget has put additional pressure on GP surgeries.

Question

How much do GPs surgeries across the Weald of Kent, including in Woodchurch and Charing, struggle with rising staff costs? Given the national insurance increases in last year’s Budget put huge pressure on them, what discussions have you or your colleagues from the Department of Health and Social Care had with Treasury colleagues about protecting GP partnerships from further NI burdens in the upcoming Budget?

Answer from The Minister for Care (Stephen Kinnock)

Thanks to the decisions taken by the Chancellor at the Budget, we are investing an extra £1.1 billion in general practice—the biggest increase in a decade. That funding has allowed us to recruit an extra 2,000 GPs, agree a contract for the first time in four years, and introduce online access. Patient satisfaction in general practice has risen from 67% last year to 75% this year, and the proportion of patients reporting difficulty contacting their practice has fallen from 18.7% in July 2024 to 10.6% in May 2025.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Discussions with Treasury colleagues about protecting GP partnerships from further NI burdens

How: Criticising Us—It Is A Bit Like The Arsonists Heckling The Firefighters

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)