Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Thames Water: Financial Viability

Thursday 20 March 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Thames Water discharged 50 percent more raw sewage last year compared to the previous year according to published data.
  • The Government are implementing measures to enhance water company performance, including the Water (Special Measures) Act 2025.
  • Sir Jon Cunliffe is conducting a review of the entire water sector to reform regulation and possibly the regulator.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Clive Jones Lib Dem Wokingham
Context

Data published in The Guardian revealed that Thames Water discharged 50% more raw sewage last year compared to the previous year. Thames Water is also accumulating billions of pounds in extraordinary debt while failing to meet its targets for river cleanliness.

Question

Data published this week in The Guardian revealed that 50% more raw sewage was discharged by Thames Water last year than in the previous 12 months. Thames Water is racking up billions of pounds of expensive extraordinary debt, while continuing to pump tonnes of sewage into our rivers. Despite bold targets and kind words, there is simply no action on cleaning up our rivers. What will the Government do to improve Thames Water’s performance?

Answer from The Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Steve Reed)

The Government are taking steps to improve the performance of all water companies, including through the Water (Special Measures) Act 2025, which I spoke about earlier. Sir Jon Cunliffe is leading a review of the entire sector, so that we can reform regulation and, if need be, the regulator, to ensure that they are fit for purpose.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specifics of how Thames Water’s performance will improve were not addressed

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)