Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Criminal Cases Review (Public Petition) 2025-06-25

25 June 2025 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Richard Tice Reform Boston and Skegness

Justice & Courts

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Richard Tice raised concerns about criminal cases review (public petition) 2025-06-25 in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Mr Tice proposed a Bill to allow the public to petition the Criminal Cases Review Commission for sentence reviews.
  • He noted that even experienced judges can make errors and additional safeguards are needed.
  • The proposal suggests that 500 public signatures could prompt a reconsideration by the commission within eight weeks.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Richard Tice Reform Boston and Skegness

Mr Tice proposed a Bill to make provision for the general public to petition the Criminal Cases Review Commission to review sentences that they believe to be either too harsh or too lenient. He emphasised the importance of confidence in our judicial system, noting that even experienced judges can get things wrong and there is a need for additional safeguards without impinging on original judgments. He suggested 500 public signatures could prompt reconsideration by the commission within eight weeks.

Other contributors (1)
  • Richard Tice Reform Boston and Skegness

    Mr Tice argued that there needs to be a treble check on sentences to ensure confidence in the judicial system. He cited instances where individuals received overly harsh sentences for minor offences, highlighting issues with current sentencing practices.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy