Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Political Donations 2025-02-12

12 February 2025 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Manuela Perteghella LD Stratford-on-Avon

Democracy & ElectionsForeign Affairs

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Manuela Perteghella raised concerns about political donations 2025-02-12 in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • The Bill aims to cap political donations and review the cap level.
  • It seeks to prevent foreign nationals from making political donations through companies.
  • The measure addresses national security and fairness concerns, supported by YouGov polls.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Manuela Perteghella LD Stratford-on-Avon

The Bill aims to cap political donations, review the level of such a cap, prevent foreign nationals from making political donations through companies, and restore public trust in our electoral system. It addresses concerns about national security and fairness, highlighting recent YouGov polls showing over two-thirds support for limiting political donations. The current lack of limits on individual or business donations is seen as detrimental to democracy. Notable examples include Elon Musk's planned donation and past donations from individuals with links to the Russian Government to the Conservative party. The Bill seeks to close legal loopholes allowing foreign money to influence British politics, ensuring that elections belong to voters rather than foreign interests.

Other contributors (1)
  • Manuela Perteghella LD Stratford-on-Avon

    Supports the Bill as it introduces a fair cap on political donations and prevents foreign donors from funding British politics. Argues that this measure is essential to protect elections from manipulation, ensure transparency in political funding, and restore faith in democracy. Points out that there is already a consensus in the House against foreign donations but legal loopholes allow them to happen.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy