Commons Sense

House of Commons · Bill Debate

Pet Abduction Bill

17 May 2024 · 5 other contributors

Opened by Anna Firth Con Leigh

Agriculture & Rural Affairs

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Anna Firth raised concerns about pet abduction bill in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • The Pet Abduction Bill aims to amend the Animal Welfare Act 2006 to address fatal dog-on-dog attacks.
  • The bill seeks to criminalise fatal dog-on-dog attacks and promote responsible dog ownership through penalties.
  • Provisions for defences such as provocation are included in the bill to ensure fair treatment of responsible dog owners.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Anna Firth Con Leigh

The Pet Abduction Bill seeks to amend the Animal Welfare Act 2006, requiring dog owners to take all reasonable steps to prevent their dogs from fatally injuring other dogs. This proposal aims to address a gap in the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 by criminalising fatal dog-on-dog attacks and empowering responsible dog ownership through penalties for irresponsible behaviour. The Bill includes provisions for defences such as provocation, ensuring that fair treatment is given to good owners who are not at fault when their dogs cause fatalities.

Other contributors (5)
  • Caroline Johnson Con Sleaford and North Hykeham

    Intervened to highlight similarities between this Bill and legislation addressing dog attacks on livestock, emphasising the need for responsible dog ownership.

  • Jonathan Lord

    Supported the notion that laws protecting guide dogs should extend to pets, expressing empathy towards families affected by tragic pet losses due to dog attacks.

  • Paul Beresford

    Asked who would be held responsible in a scenario where a farmer's sheepdog is fatally injured by an uncontrolled stray dog, suggesting potential complexities in the Bill.

  • Matt Rodda Lab Reading Central

    Expressed support for the Bill and raised a constituency case where a dog was savaged by another dog, highlighting that there were no powers available to local police. Mentioned that the Bill could potentially protect dogs severely injured in attacks but sought clarification on this point.

  • Rebecca Pow

    Thanked the hon. Member for Southend West (Anna Firth) and recognised her commendable record in animal welfare issues. Acknowledged support from other Members on welfare issues, but noted that this Bill seeks to amend the Animal Welfare Act 2006.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy