Commons Sense

House of Commons · Bill Debate

Pensions (Special Rules for End of Life) Bill - Clause 2 - Extent and Commencement

17 May 2024 · 10 other contributors

Opened by Therese Coffey Con Suffolk Coastal

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Therese Coffey raised concerns about pensions (special rules for end of life) bill - clause 2 - extent and commencement in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • Amendment 1 aims to bring the Bill's provisions into force four months after Royal Assent.
  • The amendment seeks to prevent delays due to a potential general election.
  • The Minister supports the amendments for their importance in providing timely financial support to terminally ill individuals.

Key requests to Government

Amendment 1 agreed to.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Therese Coffey Con Suffolk Coastal

The amendment aims to bring the provisions of the Bill into force four months after Royal Assent. This is to prevent any potential delay due to a general election and ensure that the critical provisions, which provide financial support up to six months earlier for those with terminal illnesses, can be implemented swiftly.

Other contributors (10)
  • Nigel Evans Ind Waveney

    Supports the amendments and explains their implications, stating they are consequential on Amendment 1.

  • Laurence Robertson Con Tewkesbury

    Agrees with the amendments proposed by Dr Coffey to ensure that the Bill can be implemented quickly without any unnecessary delay. Expresses satisfaction with the agreement reached.

  • Angela Eagle Lab Wallasey

    Expresses concern about the potential precedent set by the amendments, suggesting a 'bulldozer approach' that might not be suitable in more complex circumstances. Seeks reassurance from the Minister regarding future implications.

  • Mims Davies Con East Grinstead and Uckfield

    Supports Dr Coffey's amendments, highlighting their importance for those in terminal illness. Explains that similar commencement dates are not unusual and reassures the House about the practicality of implementation within four months.

  • Laurence Robertson Con Tewkesbury

    Mr. Laurence Robertson supports extending the definition of 'terminally ill' to twelve months for pension compensation, aiming to alleviate financial stress for those diagnosed with terminal illnesses whose pension schemes have become insolvent.

  • Therese Coffey Con Suffolk Coastal

    Ms. Therese Coffey supports the Bill, highlighting its alignment with NHS and social security reforms that extend the definition of 'terminally ill' to twelve months. She advocates for the rapid passage of this legislation.

  • Nickie Aiken Con Westminster North

    Ms. Nickie Aiken supports extending the definition of terminal illness in pension schemes to twelve months, aligning with existing NHS and social security definitions, ensuring terminally ill individuals receive necessary financial support.

  • Angela Eagle Lab Wallasey

    Supports the Bill as it aims to provide financial support for terminally ill individuals whose pension schemes have become insolvent, expanding eligibility from those with less than six months to live to those with less than 12 months. Emphasises the devastating impact of terminal illness and highlights that one in four people diagnosed with a terminal illness spends their last years in poverty, with additional costs ranging between £12,000 to £16,000 per year for a household. Questions why more work was not done to check consistency when the Act was put on the statute book.

  • Mims Davies Con East Grinstead and Uckfield

    The Bill builds on previous legislation that fast-tracked claims for individuals with less than a year to live. It ensures consistency in definitions across social security benefits, Pension Protection Fund, and financial assistance scheme, providing financial support earlier during difficult times.

  • Laurence Robertson Con Tewkesbury

    The Bill was praised for its cross-party support. The Minister acknowledged the importance of setting a date for commencement to provide certainty, and thanked all involved in advancing this legislation.

Government Response

The Minister supports Dr Coffey's amendments, emphasising their importance for timely provision of financial support to those with terminal illnesses. She reassures the House that there is no need for delay due to current arrangements.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy