Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Illegal and Unsustainable Fishing (Due Diligence)

19 March 2024 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Chris Grayling Con Arundel and South Downs

Environment

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Chris Grayling raised concerns about illegal and unsustainable fishing (due diligence) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Proposes a Bill for suppliers and retailers of fish and related products to implement due diligence systems ensuring products are not from illegal or unsustainable fishing.
  • Emphasises the need for action beyond existing regulatory regimes.
  • Advocates for mandatory due diligence rules for retailers similar to those for forest risk products.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Chris Grayling Con Arundel and South Downs

Proposes a Bill requiring suppliers and retailers of fish and related products to implement due diligence systems ensuring products are not obtained from illegal or unsustainable fishing. Emphasises the need for action beyond regulatory regimes, advocating for mandatory due diligence rules for retailers similar to those applied to forest risk products.

Other contributors (1)
  • Chris Grayling Con Arundel and South Downs

    Highlights issues such as illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing contributing significantly to the depletion of fish stocks in developing countries' coastal waters. Advocates for clear rules on sustainability for UK fish stocks and mandatory due diligence rules for retailers buying from third-party wholesalers.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy