← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Media Green Paper

08 September 2026

Lead MP

John Whittingdale
Maldon
Con

Responding Minister

Ian Murray

Tags

Culture, Media & Sport
Word Count: 9007
Other Contributors: 13

At a Glance

John Whittingdale raised concerns about media green paper in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

I ask the government to ensure that universal access to high-speed broadband of sufficient quality is achieved before proceeding with the switch-off of DTT and to consider how to support the future of commercial and local radio. The MP asks the Minister to consider an independent accreditation scheme, introduce stronger obligations on technology companies, and ensure Ofcom's standards apply to online content. She also requests a nationwide media literacy programme, restoration of the strategic priorities grant for journalism education, and sustainable funding for the BBC through the charter renewal process. The BBC has to maintain a free-to-air service, however that is delivered. I want to make sure that we do not take away the ability even to receive television, and that we keep considering whether people may be land-based and whether they can get that connection.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Maldon
Opened the debate
I am concerned about the switch-off of digital terrestrial TV in 2034, which would require every household to have an internet supply, potentially preventing reception in areas with poor broadband quality. The switch-off could also threaten the future of commercial and local radio, with transmission costs surging by almost 50% per year. The MP is concerned about who will decide what constitutes trustworthy news, suggesting an independent accreditation scheme. She highlights the importance of supporting trustworthy news beyond public service broadcasting, including independent publications and freelance journalists. The MP also stresses the need for stronger duties on platforms to amplify harmful and misleading content, and the critical role of public service broadcasting in providing essential journalism and cultural coverage. I am concerned about the switch-off of free-to-air as it stands. In 2010, there were strong proposals to switch off the FM and AM signals. Long-wave has just been switched off. Technology may move on, but it worries me that we say, "In order to solve this problem and that problem, you are going to have to buy or rent something, or in some way or another enter into a contract to receive something that you currently get free." There are people who live on canal boats, and how are they going to get an internet connection? The BBC is one of the most valuable institutions this country has, because it is able to be a public service broadcaster. It loses its way at times, when chasing ratings and saying that it has to be in competition, on some things that only a public service broadcaster can deliver.

Government Response

Ian Murray
Government Response
Welcomed the debate on the Media Green Paper, discussing the challenges faced by the media in a changing environment, the need for regulation, and the importance of a thriving public service media sector. Addressed concerns about prominence for public service media on platforms like YouTube, underlining the Government's preference for voluntary agreements but indicating the possibility of legislation if necessary. Mentioned the importance of addressing issues related to the BBC, including the permanent charter and support for minority language broadcasting. Emphasized the need to address the future of television distribution, aiming for full internet-only television by 2034 as a goal for digital inclusion and high-quality broadband.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.