← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Gambling Advertising

23 April 2026

Lead MP

Alex Ballinger
Halesowen
Lab

Responding Minister

Lilian Greenwood

Tags

Culture, Media & Sport
Word Count: 12756
Other Contributors: 4

At a Glance

Alex Ballinger raised concerns about gambling advertising in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The speaker asks for an assessment of the cumulative impact of gambling advertising exposure on children and young people and whether further action is being considered to reduce this exposure across various environments. The Government should reflect on the case for a more precautionary public health-led approach that prioritizes child protection.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Halesowen
Opened the debate
The speaker is concerned about the widespread and sophisticated nature of gambling advertising in the UK, which spends £2 billion annually. This includes exposure via television, football stadiums, local radio, social media, and video games played by children. The debate highlights that 79% of children have seen gambling adverts, with 64% on TV and 74% online. Research shows that thousands of gambling messages appear during sports matches despite the whistle-to-whistle ban, indicating a failure in regulation to protect children from exposure.

Government Response

Lilian Greenwood
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mrs Harris. I am pleased to respond to this debate, standing in for my right hon. Friend the Member for Edinburgh South (Ian Murray). I begin by congratulating my hon. Friends the Members for Halesowen and Worthing West on securing this debate and setting out their concerns so clearly and thoughtfully. We have had a genuine debate with an exchange of different viewpoints on this important issue. The Government are committed to supporting a gambling industry that is modern, responsible and sustainable, while also enhancing protections for those at risk of harm. Since the election, we have introduced robust rules in place to regulate gambling advertising, including mandatory codes enforced by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) and the voluntary industry code for socially responsible advertising. These measures include prohibitions on gambling advertising during pre-watershed televised broadcast of live sports events, banning operators from bundling different gambling products into single incentives, and requiring customers to opt-in to specific types of marketing they wish to receive. The Gambling Commission has also introduced new controls, such as a ban on front-of-shirt sponsorship in the Premier League and restrictions on influencer marketing with large underage followings. An additional £26 million has been allocated to the Gambling Commission to tackle illegal gambling advertising over the next three years. We will continue to explore measures to protect young people from online harms and consult on banning sports sponsorship by unlicensed operators, further protecting vulnerable consumers from the unregulated illegal market. We are also working with platforms and industry to measure the effectiveness of these rules and identifying ways to clamp down on illegal advertising. The Government introduced a statutory gambling levy raising £120 million in its first year for independent research into prevention and treatment of gambling-related harms, which includes research on the impacts of gambling advertising.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.