Driven Grouse Shooting

Describes the social and economic importance of grouse shooting in remote Scotland. Emphasizes that gamekeepers play a vital role in wildlife conservation and rural community life.

Acknowledges the concerns raised but emphasizes that the government is considering proposals to protect peatlands and wildlife while balancing economic benefits.

Expressed concerns about the poisoning of reintroduced sea eagles and suggested that stronger prosecution could improve public perception of grouse shooting.

Mr. Smith supports grouse shooting as a traditional sporting pursuit that delivers measurable environmental, social and economic value to the countryside. Responded to criticisms by highlighting that populations of hen harriers have increased due to conservation efforts on managed grouse moors, arguing against a blanket ban on grouse shooting.

Highlights the importance of rural jobs provided by shooting sports and the training offered at local universities for conservation work.

Supports grouse shooting due to its economic benefits and conservation role. Declares membership in BASC, Countryside Alliance Ireland, Sport Ireland, and Ulster Farmers Union.

Asked the Minister to explore introducing vicarious responsibility for landowners across the UK to properly prosecute wildlife crimes.

Opposes the petition's claims, stating that driven grouse shooting is economically significant for his constituency of Thirsk and Malton. He argues against suggestions that it harms the environment or wildlife. Supported Robbie Moore’s concerns about the impact of changing the definition of deep peat on moorland management. Questions the advice given by Natural England, suggesting it could make his constituency unviable for grouse shooting.

Spoke powerfully in favour of grouse shooting and shared personal experiences.

Her constituency presents a unique challenge due to its proximity to the moors, and she understands the importance of grouse shooting for her community's environment and biodiversity.

Argues that grouse shooting is harmful and requires more regulation due to environmental destruction, illegal persecution of birds of prey, and commercial interests. Mentions the petition signed by 635 constituents. Asked about which Government introduced a partial ban on peatland burning.

Highlights that grouse shooting is fundamental to hard-working people in rural constituencies. Discusses the economic significance of the industry, noting 2,500 direct jobs and tens of millions of pounds paid out in wages annually. Argues against the notion that the only victims would be caricatured rich men.

Mr. Moore acknowledges the importance of managing grouse moorland for economic, social, environmental, and ecological reasons but stresses that banning grouse shooting would have significant ramifications. Stressed the ecological benefits of grouse shooting and highlighted the economic contributions, including job creation and investment. Expressed concern over the proposed change in the definition of deep peat and urged the Government to review Natural England's direction. The MP emphasises that moorland management benefits environmental outcomes, including bird species like the hen harrier, and calls for private investment to continue these practices.

Emphasised the importance of jobs and livelihoods in his constituency, advocating for conservation efforts that support local communities. The MP acknowledges the economic benefits of grouse shooting but expresses concern about wildlife protection and requests a timetable for banning trail hunting.

Acknowledged the cultural significance and economic benefits of grouse shooting while stressing the need for action against illegal activities such as raptor persecution.