Commons Sense

House of Commons · Westminster Hall

Seriously Ill Children: Financial Support for Parents

25 March 2025 · 5 other contributors · 3,692 words

Opened by Chris Hinchliff Lab North East Hertfordshire

Responding minister: Sir Stephen Timms

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Chris Hinchliff raised concerns about seriously ill children: financial support for parents in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key points

  • Concerns raised about the challenges faced by families caring for seriously ill children, highlighting the need for improved financial support systems.
  • Chris Hinchliff calls on the government to provide day one financial support for families facing such challenges, as advocated by Hugh's law.
  • Sir Stephen Timms acknowledges the debate's importance and outlines existing support through universal credit, bereavement benefits, and disability living allowance, with consultations to raise the age limit for transitioning to personal independence payments.

Key requests to Government

Chris Hinchliff calls on the government to ensure that all families facing such challenges receive day one financial support as advocated by Hugh’s law.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Chris Hinchliff Lab North East Hertfordshire

The debate highlights the challenges faced by families caring for seriously ill children, with Ceri and Frances Menai-Davis's experience illustrating the unfairness of navigating burdensome and insufficient systems. Approximately 68% of women and 75% of men with mental health problems are parents, adding emotional strain. Last year, a quarter of parents struggled to provide sufficient food for their children.

Other contributors (5)
  • Alison Bennett LD Mid Sussex

    Agrees with Chris Hinchliff's advocacy for Hugh’s law, citing examples from constituents who faced financial ruin due to their child's illness and the burden it places on families.

  • Chris Bloore Lab Redditch

    Highlights how families miss important medical appointments due to financial challenges, emphasizing the need for immediate financial support.

  • Lauren Sullivan Lab Gravesham

    Supports Hugh’s law and suggests that a £750 grant would provide certainty and help parents by stopping the rigmarole of going through universal credit.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Commends Chris Hinchliff for securing this debate and highlights the need for the government to do more, even with charities stepping in. Calls for compassionate action. Stresses the enormous pressure on parents when their child is experiencing severe health issues and highlights the need for someone to help them fill out forms and receive necessary support.

  • Stephen Timms Lab East Ham

    Refers to new entitlements introduced under the Neonatal Care (Leave and Pay) Act 2023 and discusses Government’s Employment Rights Bill that will make it easier for carers to access leave from day one of starting a job.

Government Response

Sir Stephen Timms

The Minister for Social Security and Disability

Sir Stephen Timms acknowledges the importance of the debate and commends Chris Hinchliff’s consistent advocacy on this topic. He outlines existing support through universal credit, bereavement run-on benefits, disability living allowance, and personal independence payments for children over 16 years old. The minister mentions ongoing consultations to raise the age limit from 16 to 18 for transitioning from DLA to PIP and notes a significant increase in applications since January 2020 due to the pandemic. Acknowledges the significant support offered by his Department, including the relaunched children and young people cancer taskforce. States there are no current plans to introduce a day one non-means-tested grant but highlights existing Government initiatives aimed at supporting parents of seriously ill children.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy