Commons Sense

House of Commons · Westminster Hall

Women’s Changed State Pension Age: Compensation

17 March 2025 · 42 other contributors · 20,946 words

Opened by Roz Savage Lib Dem South Cotswolds

Responding minister: Torsten Bell

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Roz Savage raised concerns about women’s changed state pension age: compensation in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key points

  • The Government refused to compensate WASPI women despite over 160,000 petition signatures supporting fair compensation.
  • The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman recommended 2,950 as compensation for each affected woman.
  • The Minister acknowledged communication issues but disagreed with the ombudsman's remedy due to concerns about unsolicited mail effectiveness.

Key requests to Government

The lead MP asks for fair compensation for WASPI women, citing the ombudsman's recommendation of £2,950 per woman to address the injustice caused by inadequate communication and lack of transparency from the DWP.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Roz Savage Lib Dem South Cotswolds

The Government's refusal to compensate WASPI women is shocking, with clear maladministration by the DWP and a lack of proper communication. Despite over 160,000 petition signatures supporting fair compensation for women affected by state pension changes, the DWP has failed to explain why it concluded written notification was necessary but did not provide it. The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman recommended £2,950 as compensation for each affected woman.

Other contributors (42)
  • Adrian Ramsay Green Waveney Valley

    Called for the Government to revisit the issue and strengthen democracy by following ombudsman recommendations.

  • Alex Brewer LD North East Hampshire

    In his constituency, there are almost 6,000 women affected by pension changes. He highlights a constituent who was unaware of the changes and faced significant financial consequences as a result.

  • Alison Hume Lab Scarborough and Whitby

    Discusses the impact on 7,160 women in her constituency and highlights cases where lack of notification led to financial hardship for carers.

  • Andy McDonald Lab Middlesbrough and Thornaby East

    The hon. Member for Middlesbrough and Thornaby East expressed concern over the rejection of ombudsman recommendations and its impact on transparency in public services. Questioned whether it was fair to ignore the ombudsman’s conclusion that compensation should be paid.

  • Ben Lake PC Dwyfor Meirionnydd

    Commends the persistence of 1950s-born women in fighting for justice, noting their efforts over eight years to collect evidence and support each other despite financial hardship and distress. He agrees that there is an opportunity now to right a wrong and restore faith in MPs and Parliament. He calls for the Government to reconsider and give Parliament the chance to vote on this matter.

  • Brian Leishman Lab Alloa and Grangemouth

    The hon. Member for South Cotswolds gave an excellent opening speech. Like many Labour colleagues, I have attended rallies and met WASPI women in opposition but now we are in power they are still no closer to getting what they deserve.

  • Cat Smith Lab Lancaster and Wyre

    The previous Chair of the Petitions Committee supported Dr Savage's opening speech, emphasizing the strength of feeling shown by the petition reaching 160,000 signatures.

  • Chris Hinchliff Lab North East Hertfordshire

    Questions the Government's approach to compensation, suggesting it undermines principles of delivering justice for maladministration.

  • Christine Jardine LD East Dunbartonshire

    She expresses frustration at having to debate this issue again and highlights the irony of discussing it after participating in discussions on women's rights internationally. Stated that awareness of pension age changes does not mean women knew it would affect them personally, highlighting the need for more detailed communication. Called on the Minister to change the Government's mind based on lessons learned from the case.

  • Claire Young LD Thornbury and Yate

    Acknowledged the historical inequalities faced by WASPI women in the workplace and in finance before the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 was introduced.

  • Danny Kruger Con East Wiltshire

    Paid tribute to the hon. Member for South Cotswolds and highlighted the cross-party nature of efforts to address the WASPI women issue.

  • Douglas McAllister Lab West Dunbartonshire

    Supports the close to 6,000 women in West Dunbartonshire affected by state pension age changes and acknowledges maladministration. Urges the Government to review and explore a compensation scheme for over 300,000 women in Scotland.

  • Al Pinkerton LD Surrey Heath

    He supports his colleague’s point about workplace injustices experienced by women born in the 1950s, including lower pay and fewer career opportunities compared to today's women.

  • Simon Opher Lab Stroud

    Agrees with his hon. Friend that it is an injustice on which consecutive Governments have a stained record and urges the Government to recognise the people who voted for them do not want the language of 'tough choices'.

  • Elaine Stewart Lab Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock

    The Labour Government should take action to rectify the historic wrongs faced by WASPI women who have endured financial despair due to changes in the state pension age. The DWP must provide fair compensation as they failed to communicate these changes effectively.

  • Euan Stainbank Lab Falkirk

    Asked why the Government can pick and choose when to implement ombudsman recommendations, questioned the basis of the 90% figure used by the Secretary of State, and called for redress for WASPI women.

  • Gregory Stafford Con Farnham and Bordon

    The hon. Member for Farnham and Bordon noted that Labour's support for WASPI women has weakened since they took office, questioning faith in parliamentary democracy.

  • Ian Byrne Lab Liverpool West Derby

    Called for the Minister to ensure a free vote in Parliament so that it can decide whether compensation should be paid to WASPI women, urging reconsideration of the stance against compensating them.

  • Imran Hussain Lab Bradford East

    He speaks about the 4,900 women impacted in his constituency and highlights the injustices faced by over 3.7 million WASPI women due to changes in state pension age without proper notice.

  • Jess Brown-Fuller LD Chichester

    Supports her colleague’s story and mentions a similar case of Christine, who lost income due to incorrect pension age information. She argues that the government's refusal to compensate sets a dangerous precedent.

  • Jim Allister TUV North Antrim

    Emphasises the importance of upholding the ombudsman’s findings and rectifying injustices by putting right what was wronged, criticising the Government's refusal to compensate affected women. Emphasized the importance of public confidence in government, highlighting the need for recompense for injustice done to WASPI women.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Raises concerns about the cost implications of a judicial review and urges the Government to negotiate with WASPI women to ensure justice is served. Complimented Government Back Benchers for supporting the WASPI women and asked if the Minister would meet them before a judicial review is held. Asked about the possibility of judicial review forcing the Government to give WASPI women compensation and justice.

  • John Milne LD Horsham

    Challenged the Government's reliance on a DWP survey that found 90% of women understood pension age changes, arguing other studies showed only half understood. Called for respect of ombudsman recommendations and consideration of compensation mechanisms.

  • Jon Trickett Lab Normanton and Hemsworth

    The Government has failed to compensate WASPI women, leading to financial hardship for thousands of women who worked all their lives.

  • Josh Babarinde LD Eastbourne

    Congratulated Dr Savage for opening the debate and highlighted his constituent Yvonne's situation, who faced financial hardship due to changes in pension age without proper communication or notice.

  • Lee Pitcher Lab Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme

    Shared a constituent's story illustrating the hardship faced by WASPI women due to pension age changes, stressing the need for justice through compensation.

  • Liz Jarvis LD Eastleigh

    Pays tribute to WASPI campaigners in her constituency, including Mary who had to live on virtually nothing for six years after unexpected delay and Karin who faced financial struggle caring for an elderly mother while facing state pension age changes.

  • Manuela Perteghella LD Stratford-on-Avon

    Honours serving under chairship and provides no specific contribution beyond acknowledging the debate's topic. Agreed with previous speakers and stated that the Liberal Democrats are committed to fighting for fair compensation. She emphasized the need for this Labour Government to act on justice for WASPI women.

  • Michelle Scrogham Lab Barrow and Furness

    The Barrow and Furness WASPI women have worked tirelessly to advocate for fairness, but they faced severe consequences due to changes in the pension age without adequate notice or preparation.

  • Mike Wood Con Kingswinford and South Staffordshire

    He agreed with the previous speaker that Parliament should act based on the ombudsman’s findings of maladministration, highlighting the need for proper recompense to those who suffered loss.

  • Mohammad Yasin Lab Bedford

    Supported the WASPI campaign and called for accountability and redress from the Government, emphasizing the urgency of addressing maladministration findings.

  • Jonathan Brash Lab Hartlepool

    The hon. Member mentioned his mother is a WASPI woman celebrating her birthday today, urging the Minister to change the Government's position on this issue.

  • Patricia Ferguson Lab Glasgow West

    Highlights the impact on 160,000 signatories and over 4,000 women in her own constituency. She discusses the historical context of pension age changes and the need for fair compensation based on the ombudsman's findings.

  • Rebecca Long Bailey Lab Salford

    She discusses the importance of government accountability mechanisms and expresses concern over the ombudsman’s report being dismissed by the Government, which she sees as a potential threat to democracy. Questioned the reliability of datasets used by the Government to assert awareness among affected women and asked for precise figures excluding those not born in the 1950s.

  • Richard Burgon Lab Leeds East

    The hon. Member for Leeds East highlighted public support, noting that 74% of people back fair compensation for WASPI women.

  • Sarah Dyke LD Glastonbury and Somerton

    Said that a constituent in her constituency was made homeless due to not receiving fair pension compensation, agreeing with Dr Cameron's call for the Government to reverse its decision.

  • Seamus Logan SNP Aberdeenshire North and Moray East

    The Government's claim that 90% of affected women knew about the pension age change is misleading, with many women in Scotland signing a petition for compensation. The WASPI women deserve justice after facing financial strain and emotional distress. Asked the Minister to explain his assertion that the majority of women were aware of these changes.

  • John Hayes Con South Holland and The Deepings

    The DWP's failure to properly implement the 1995 Pensions Act has caused significant harm to WASPI women, violating principles of good governance and accountability. He supports the hon. Member's case, urging the Government to step forward and deliver justice. He praises Rebecca Long Bailey's contribution to the campaign for compensation and suggests a meeting between MPs and WASPI women to resolve the issue amicably.

  • Siân Berry Green Brighton Pavilion

    Agrees that the WASPI women are right to use the word 'gaslighting' to describe the Government’s suggestion that there is no problem here and that everybody knew, striking harshly at women who have faced lifelong injustices.

  • Steve Darling SNP Torbay

    Highlighted the impact of lost trust between public and politicians, advocating for compensation for over 3.7 million WASPI women across the UK. Asked if the Minister had conversations with the ombudsman on a just compensation system and acknowledged campaigners' tenacity.

  • Torsten Bell Lab Dartford

    Explained the Government's decision not to compensate all affected women, citing challenges in assessing individual circumstances and affordability concerns.

  • Wendy Chamberlain LD North East Fife

    My hon. Friend Wendy Chamberlain discussed the gender pay gap and its impact on pension inequality, supporting Dr Savage's call for reconsideration of WASPI women's cases.

Government Response

Torsten Bell

The Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury

Acknowledged the importance of pension age changes and the significance of the petition. The Minister noted that the ombudsman focused on communication issues rather than the legality or merits of decisions made in 1995 and 2011, agreeing with the conclusion regarding delays in sending letters but disagreeing on remedy due to concerns over unsolicited mail effectiveness and majority awareness. He provided context on survey research showing significant awareness among women affected by state pension age changes. Explained that while the Government has not ignored the ombudsman’s report, they came to a different view based on research. Mentioned affordability issues with compensation schemes costing up to £10.5 billion and stated the decision was not driven purely by cost.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy