Commons Sense

House of Commons · Westminster Hall

Bathing Water Regulations

04 March 2025 · 10 other contributors · 9,507 words

Opened by Gideon Amos Lib Dem Taunton and Wellington

Responding minister: Emma Hardy

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Gideon Amos raised concerns about bathing water regulations in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key points

  • Concerns raised about pollution and poor water quality in the River Tone due to untreated effluent discharges.
  • Calls for flow-rate monitoring and additional stormwater storage to address pollution issues.
  • Minister acknowledges the need for ongoing efforts to improve the water system but warns against relying on bathing water designations for broader water quality improvements.

Key requests to Government

Calls for flow-rate monitoring, extra stormwater storage and resources for the Environment Agency to increase enforcement. He also asks if steps have been taken to resolve discrepancies between bathing designations and water companies' investment plans.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Gideon Amos Lib Dem Taunton and Wellington

There are beautiful natural landscapes in the country including beaches and rivers like the River Tone, but pollution issues persist. The river has been proven to have poor water quality with recent discharges of untreated effluent being commonplace, leading residents to fear for their health when using the river.

Other contributors (10)
  • Edward Morello Con West Dorset

    Morello highlighted the economic benefits of clean water and tourism in West Dorset, emphasizing the importance of clean water for local communities beyond health and nature. Made a point about the economic value of maintaining clean bathing waters for tourism revenue, estimated at £4 billion annually.

  • Freddie van Mierlo LD Henley and Thame

    Van Mierlo discussed the perversity of requiring swimmers to brave dirty waters before clean-up, advocating for a recreational water designation that considers all river users. Talked about the topsy-turvy nature of the bathing water status, which can create all sorts of perverse outcomes in his communities.

  • Gideon Amos Lab/Co-op Taunton and Wellington

    Secured this debate to discuss improving bathing water quality in rivers, lakes and seas.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Proposes that there should be signs at designated bathing waters indicating the water quality to make it simpler for people using wild-water swimming and other pursuits to see if the water quality is suitable.

  • Joe Morris Lab Newcastle upon Tyne North

    Emphasised the importance of maintaining public engagement in ongoing work to keep rivers clean and highlighted the need for continuous improvement to ensure water quality.

  • Manuela Perteghella LD Stratford-on-Avon

    Perteghella discussed pollution threats to the River Avon and advocated for stronger regulations, legally binding targets, and more transparent testing to tackle water quality issues. Highlighted the importance of protecting biodiversity in our waterways and recognising the role of citizen scientists.

  • Pippa Heylings Lab Newcastle upon Tyne East

    The surge in open-water swimming due to the pandemic raised concerns about public health and ecosystem risks, especially with sewage discharges over 100,000 times in designated bathing areas. The proposed reforms might reduce designated sites and fail to ensure water quality improvements. Discussed the public health and ecological aspects of maintaining bathing water designations in her constituency. She highlights the issue of prior testing affecting bathing water designation negatively. Clarified that bathing site status is seen as a mechanism to enforce the 'polluter pays' principle and stressed that designated sites are already being used as such due to their cultural, historical, and ecological importance.

  • Rachel Gilmour LD Tiverton and Minehead

    In her constituency, a constituent's children fell seriously ill after swimming in a local river due to sewage discharges. She emphasised the need for stricter regulations on water companies and combined sewers.

  • Sarah Dyke LD Glastonbury and Somerton

    Supports the need for more designated bathing water sites, highlighting the River Parrett which was discharged with sewage 54 times in 2023.

  • Tim Farron LD Westmorland and Lonsdale

    Farron praised Amos's debate and highlighted the importance of bathing water status in improving standards for those responsible for waterways quality. Suggested placing water quality monitors to measure the impact of toxic waste on river health and proposed a way to describe when it is safe for bathing.

Government Response

Emma Hardy

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Minister acknowledges the current broken water system and discusses ongoing efforts such as the Water (Special Measures) Act 025. She also mentions the importance of not viewing bathing water status as a golden ticket to improve all waters.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy