Opened the debate
I am concerned about the Criminal Cases Review Commission's handling of Paul Cleeland's case, which has been ongoing since his conviction in 1972 for murder. Mr Cleeland maintains his innocence and there are multiple issues with the evidence presented during his trial, including lack of forensic evidence linking him to the crime weapon and potential inaccuracies in witness statements. The CCRC's continued reliance on flawed evidence undermines the credibility of its process.