Commons Sense

House of Commons · Westminster Hall

Microchipping of Pets

28 June 2021 · 9 other contributors · 14,615 words

Opened by Jonathan Gullis Con Stoke-on-Trent North

Responding minister: Victoria Prentis

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Jonathan Gullis raised concerns about microchipping of pets in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key points

  • Concerns raised about pet theft and the failure to scan microchips by default in veterinary settings.
  • Request made for the government to mandate microchip scanning in veterinary practices and prevent euthanasia of healthy pets without proper verification.
  • Minister highlighted government initiatives on animal welfare, including compulsory cat microchipping and changes to vet guidance for scanning microchips.

Key requests to Government

I ask the government to make it compulsory for veterinary practices to scan pets when they are presented for the first consultation or yearly check-up and ensure that no healthy animal can be destroyed by a vet without scanning its microchip. I also request action on creating a centralised database of microchipped pets to facilitate easier reunifications.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Jonathan Gullis Con Stoke-on-Trent North

I am concerned about the growing problem of pet theft and the fact that many stolen pets are not reunited with their owners because vets do not scan microchips by default. Fern's law campaign highlights how a dog named Fern was missing for six years due to missed opportunities when she visited vets without being scanned. Additionally, there is concern over healthy animals being euthanised without proper verification of the person requesting it and without contacting rescue back-up listed on the animal's microchip. It is estimated that close to 1.5 million dogs were adopted or bought during the pandemic, raising fears about many healthy dogs potentially being brought in for euthanasia as life returns to normal.

Other contributors (9)
  • Andrea Jenkyns Con Morley and Outwood

    Ms Jenkyns shared her personal experience of losing a family dog, highlighting the emotional impact of pet loss. She emphasised the importance of microchipping pets to increase the chances of reuniting them with their families. According to the RSPCA, there are 51 million pets in the UK across 44% of households, making pet welfare crucial for many people, especially during health challenges. Ms Jenkyns supported measures requiring vets to scan microchips to combat rising pet theft and to ensure owner awareness before euthanasia.

  • Iain Duncan Smith Con Chingford and Woodford Green

    Highlighted the issue of compulsory dog microchipping but not scanning by vets, proposing new clauses to ban cash sales for pets, make scanning obligatory, and criminalize pet theft more severely. Raised concerns about puppy farming, dog theft, increased violence during thefts, and the rise in property value attributed to stolen dogs. Emphasized the need for legislative updates to protect pets and their owners from crime and violence.

  • James Daly Con Derbyshire Dales

    James Daly expressed concerns about the lack of legal requirement for veterinarians, local authorities or highways agencies to scan dog and cat microchips. He highlighted Tuk's law which seeks to prevent unnecessary euthanasia by ensuring rescues are contacted before an animal is put down if it has a registered rescue back-up on its microchip. Daly also supported Fern's law that aims to make scanning mandatory for reunification of stolen pets.

  • Jane Stevenson Lab Bolton South East

    Pet theft reform is crucial, and a single database to identify lost or stolen dogs is basic common sense. The speaker supports new clause 15 of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill for Fern's law, which would oblige vets to scan microchips if presented with a dog that needs treatment. She also noted the impact of pet theft on constituents' confidence in taking their pets out.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Jim Shannon expressed concern about the theft of dogs and cats in his constituency, noting that during the pandemic, people have relied on pets for companionship. He cited examples of stolen pets fetching high prices on the black market. Shannon also highlighted the importance of microchipping to reunite lost or stolen animals with their owners, citing statistics from Cats Protection indicating that 26% of cats in the UK are not microchipped.

  • Lisa Cameron SNP East Dunbartonshire

    Ms Cameron visited a rescue centre and highlighted the difficulty in reuniting pets with their owners due to outdated details. She suggested making microchip scanning mandatory for vets at a pet's first consultation and creating a centralised database for microchip companies, which would help reunite pets with their families. With over 3 million pets acquired during the pandemic, she noted an unprecedented rise in pet theft, where only one in five stolen pets are returned to their family.

  • Luke Evans Con Hinckley and Bosworth

    The MP discussed his own pets, Roux and Ada, two whippets that he had during the lockdown period. He highlighted the challenges of keeping these dogs in the garden due to their escape artist nature and emphasised the importance of microchipping for pet safety. The MP also mentioned the increase in puppy smuggling and profiteering within the pet industry.

  • Luke Pollard Lab Co-op Plymouth Sutton and Devonport

    The MP thanked the hon. Member for Stoke-on-Trent North for introducing the petition, highlighting cross-party support for action on microchipping pets. He expressed concern that despite agreement across parties, no concrete steps have been taken. The MP called for swift implementation of secondary legislation and clarification on what needs primary legislation to address the issue effectively. With 235,000 signatures supporting the petition, including 436 from his constituency, he stressed the importance of action not just in microchipping but also in ensuring systems are in place to scan and identify chips when animals go missing or need veterinary care. He supported amendments to existing legislation like the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill to include measures against pet theft and advocated for Fern's law requiring vets to check pets' microchips before treatment.

  • Richard Holden Con Basildon and Billericay

    He highlighted the importance of pets as family members and supported the need for compulsory scanning to complement existing microchipping requirements. He emphasised the necessity of a single database system for pet information and stressed the urgency of addressing issues such as pet theft and the increased cost of dogs during lockdown.

Government Response

Victoria Prentis

Emphasised the Government's commitment to animal welfare through various Bills and initiatives, including compulsory cat microchipping and reforms for microchip database systems. Addressed Tuk's law by emphasizing vet guidance changes requiring vets to scan microchips when healthy dogs are presented for euthanasia. Discussed Fern's law, mentioning ongoing work of a multi-departmental pet theft taskforce reporting in July, with legislative and non-legislative measures expected in the autumn. Reassured on roadkill disposal without scanning cats' microchips by highlighting best practices across local authorities.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy