House of Commons · Written Ministerial Statement
Parliamentary Question 496 correction
01 March 2022 · Department of Health and Social Care
Proposed by Maggie Throup Con Erewash
Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.
At a glance
Key points
- A correction is being issued for a previous statement regarding Public Health England's involvement in assessing inactivation methods against COVID-19.
- The minister clarifies that the UK Health and Safety Laboratory, not Public Health England, assessed hydroxyl free radical air purification technologies.
- The correction addresses a previous written answer related to the assessment of inactivation methods during the COVID-19 outbreak.
Issue summary
A correction is being issued for a previous statement regarding Public Health England's involvement in assessing inactivation methods against COVID-19.
Action requested
The minister is correcting a previous written answer and clarifying that the UK Health and Safety Laboratory, not Public Health England, assessed hydroxyl free radical air purification technologies in response to the COVID-19 outbreak.
Key facts
- Written Question 496 was answered on 18 May 2021.
- The previous statement inaccurately stated that Public Health England had conducted an assessment of inactivation methods against COVID-19, including UV-C and H2O2 vapour.
- The UK Health and Safety Laboratory actually assessed the potential merits of hydroxyl free radical air purification technologies.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy