Context
The independent curriculum and assessment review published its final report last month, recommending the retention of EBacc grouping in the progress 8 measure under 'Academic Breadth'. The Government's decision to change this recommendation is being questioned.
Question
What discussions has she had with the chair of the curriculum and assessment review on her proposals to change the progress 8 measure? Professor Francis was clear that the EBacc grouping should be kept in the progress 8 measure under the heading 'Academic Breadth'. The Government have overruled the review, which is quite a big thing to do. The Secretary of State herself used to be a student of modern languages. Have they learned nothing from their terrible error in 2004, or what does she have today against modern languages and humanities?
Answer from The Secretary of State for Education (Bridget Phillipson)
I do love modern languages, and I was a very keen student of them myself, but I am afraid that, as the right hon. Gentleman will know, the EBacc did not drive improved access to modern foreign languages. He knows that—he will have looked at the data. I do not think that the system as it stands provides the right balance: it unnecessarily constrains student choice, it affects students’ engagement, and it has hampered progress in subjects that strengthen our economy and society. I believe in high standards, strong foundations and academic achievement, but I also believe that access to music, sport and vocational subjects should be the right of every child, not just the lucky few.
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)