Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Renewable Energy: Private Sector Investment

Tuesday 15 July 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Jess Brown-Fuller asked about reducing grid access costs to attract more private sector investment in community energy projects.
  • The Secretary of State acknowledged the importance of community energy projects.
  • The Secretary of State mentioned that Great British Energy will partner with local communities to deliver community energy initiatives.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Jess Brown-Fuller Lib Dem Chichester
Context

The MP highlights a successful community energy scheme called Meadow Blue Community Energy in Chichester, which invests back into the local community and supports solar panel installations on school roofs.

Question

Private sector investment via community energy schemes is a popular way of engaging people to get behind renewable energy projects in their area. Does the Secretary of State agree that community energy projects would attract more private sector investment if grid access costs were reduced and the delivery of local supply was made easier?

Answer from The Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero (Ed Miliband)

The hon. Lady raises an important issue, which was also raised by the right hon. and learned Member for Kenilworth and Southam. She is right about the virtues of community energy. Great British Energy will partner with local communities to deliver community energy up and down the country because sometimes public capital can help lever in private capital that we need. She is also right about some of the barriers, as the Energy Minister mentioned. I want to assure her that we are going through different barriers in granular, nerdy detail to see how we can break them down.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Reducing grid access costs and simplifying local supply delivery were acknowledged but not directly committed to in a specific timeframe or mechanism.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email