Context
The Government launched a campaign to increase pension credit applications, but there was also an increase of 133% in the number of claims not allowed and more than 100,000 awards were denied. Pensioners facing arbitrary thresholds are losing out on support.
Question
The Government did indeed launch a campaign to increase the number of pension credit applications, but sadly there was also a surge—an increase of 133%—in the number of claims that were not allowed, and more than 100,000 awards were not made. For many pensioners, including a number in my constituency, the winter fuel payment was a lifeline—indeed, many need their heating to be turned on throughout the year, not just during the winter—but just because of an arbitrary threshold they now receive nothing at all, and they are losing out. Will the Government look at this again, given the impact and the risk of pushing more pensioners into poverty?
Answer from Torsten Bell (The Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury)
I can tell the right hon. Member about pensioner poverty. It halved under the last Labour Government and it rose on the Conservatives’ watch, by 200,000. Yes, we have had to make some difficult choices, but it is because of those difficult choices that we can afford a £31 billion annual increase in the state pension over the current Parliament and an extra £26 billion a year for the NHS. None of those choices would the Conservatives back, which is why the NHS and the state pension would be endangered on their watch.
Not addressed: The impact of means-testing winter fuel payment on poverty levels was not directly addressed; instead, focus was on overall pensioner poverty statistics and government spending commitments.
How: Redirecting To Broader Policy Context
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)