Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Prosecution of Rural Crime

Thursday 8 May 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • The cost of rural crime in Wales increased by 4.3% year on year to 52.8 million in 2023.
  • Criminal gangs are targeting farms across Wales, including in the constituency of David Chadwick.
  • The government is committed to implementing the Equipment Theft (Prevention) Act 2023 and has announced additional funding for tackling rural crime.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 David Chadwick Lib Dem Brecon, Radnor and Cwm Tawe
Context

The National Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Society's report showed that in 2023, the cost of rural crime increased by 4.3% to £52.8 million, affecting farms across Wales, including the questioner's constituency.

Question

According to the latest figures from the National Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Society’s rural crime report, in 2023, the cost of rural crime increased by 4.3% year on year to £52.8 million, with criminal gangs targeting farms up and down Wales—including, unfortunately, in my constituency. Prosecution rates for livestock theft in particular are very low—often below 1%, despite the huge financial and emotional toll that this type of crime takes on farmers. What actions are the Government taking to tackle those low prosecution rates?

Answer from The Solicitor General

We know that rural and farming communities face acute and bespoke threats from criminals, including highly organised crime groups that are exploiting our rural communities. We are committed to implementing the Equipment Theft (Prevention) Act 2023, and we have also announced additional funding for the national rural and wildlife crime units. This recognises just how critical it is to crack down on rural crime.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific measure or timeline to increase prosecution rates for livestock theft was not provided.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)