Context
Mr Carmichael is concerned about changes to tax reliefs that may adversely affect farmers. He references previous discussions and meetings but notes the Chancellor's absence.
Question
I thank the Chancellor’s human shield for that answer, but the fact that the Chancellor—who is sitting on the Front Bench—was not prepared to stand up and answer for herself demonstrates a distinct lack of respect for farmers, bordering on contempt. Will she not meet the farming unions, the banks, the professional organisations, and even the supermarkets themselves to hear why they all think her calculations are wrong? If the Minister wants to ask her before he stands up, I am sure we will all allow him a second or two.
Answer from James Murray (Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury)
That was not the most dignified question from the right hon. Gentleman. On the Chancellor’s behalf, I have met numerous organisations about this matter, including those I listed a moment ago. I met the right hon. Gentleman himself when he came to the Treasury, and of course there have been extensive debates in this place. We may not agree on the way forward, but I do not think anyone can accuse us of not having listened.
Not addressed: The specific ask for a meeting with farming unions, banks, professional organisations and supermarkets was not directly addressed; instead, the minister mentioned previous meetings and debates.
How: That Was Not The Most Dignified Question From The Right Hon. Gentleman
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)