Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

National Wealth Fund: Opportunities for Industry

Tuesday 4 February 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Patrick Hurley asked about the opportunities and initiatives for wind farms in the Liverpool Bay area near his constituency.
  • The Secretary of State acknowledged the importance of the question regarding the number of renewable jobs in Britain compared to other countries.
  • The response highlighted that Germany, Sweden, and Denmark have significantly more renewable jobs per capita than Britain.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

Discussions about job creation in constituencies hosting offshore wind farms, particularly referencing existing projects like Burbo Bank off Southport.

Question

I thank the Secretary of State for his answer. In the Liverpool bay area, just off the coast of my Southport constituency, we already have a number of wind farms, including the Burbo Bank scheme. Can he outline to the House what more his Department is doing to ensure that, as we put up these wind farms, jobs are created in constituencies like mine?

Answer from The Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero (Ed Miliband)

My hon. Friend asks a really important question, which Members from right across this House will agree with. The situation we have inherited from the last Government is that Germany has almost twice as many renewables jobs per capita as Britain, Sweden almost three times as many, and Denmark almost four times as many. Through a combination of Great British Energy, the national wealth fund and a clean industry bonus, we are making sure that we do not just build offshore wind in this country, but reap the huge industrial opportunity from it.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not provide specific measures or commitments for creating jobs in Southport constituency beyond general statements about policy goals.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)