Commons Sense

House of Commons · Westminster Hall

Employment Rights: Impact on Businesses

16 September 2025 · 10 other contributors · 8,580 words

Opened by Lincoln Jopp Con Spelthorne

Responding minister: Kate Dearden

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Lincoln Jopp raised concerns about employment rights: impact on businesses in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key points

  • Members across the House are aware that Spelthorne has 4,500 small businesses and major employers such as BP's global headquarters.
  • The Employment Rights Bill could cost businesses up to 5 billion annually according to the Government's impact assessment, which the Institute of Economic Affairs considers an underestimate.
  • The lead MP requests the Government to reconsider the measures in the Employment Rights Bill due to significant underestimated costs and potential negative effects on business growth and employment.

Key requests to Government

The lead MP requests that the Government reconsider the measures in the Employment Rights Bill given their significant underestimated cost to businesses and potential detrimental effects on growth and employment. The Regulatory Policy Committee has stated that the impact assessment is not fit for purpose, suggesting insufficient evidence of an imbalance of power between employers and workers.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Lincoln Jopp Con Spelthorne

Members across the House are aware that Spelthorne has 4,500 small businesses and major employers such as BP’s global headquarters. The Employment Rights Bill could cost businesses up to £5 billion annually according to the Government's impact assessment, which the Institute of Economic Affairs considers a considerable underestimate due to its failure to account for impacts on business costs and hiring.

Other contributors (10)
  • Andy McDonald Lab Sheffield South East

    The hon. Member for Sheffield South East questioned the impact of the Employment Rights Bill on business costs, as estimated by Labour's own assessment at £5 billion. Agreed with the Minister that workers in good jobs can contribute economically by spending money locally.

  • Harriett Baldwin Con West Worcestershire

    Welcomed the Minister to her position, questioned how she reconciles falling payroll employment with Labour's mission for economic growth, citing recent labour market data showing a decline of 142,000 in payroll employment.

  • Euan Stainbank Lab Falkirk

    Low productivity was a major feature of the last Administration, and low pay and insecure hours contribute to high turnover and sickness absence. The Employment Rights Bill addresses these issues.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Small businesses are the backbone of the British economy, with 89.3% being micro-sized and having fewer than 10 employees. The Federation of Small Businesses says sickness absence costs an average small employer more than £3,500 a year.

  • Kate Dearden Con Staffordshire Moorlands

    Responded to Steve Barclay regarding social care concerns, stating willingness to address specific interests and concerns.

  • The Chancellor promised the most pro-business Government ever, but at a CEO summit, not a single hand went up when asked how many CEOs thought it was true. The hon. Member for Redcar mentioned repairing the economy in her first year. Questioned the adequacy of impact assessments, citing concerns from the Regulatory Policy Committee. Fears the Employment Rights Bill will negatively impact the economy, leading to a decrease in employment for women and disabled people.

  • Rachael Maskell Ind York Central

    Contrary to concerns about industrial action and employer-employee relations, good partnerships between trade unions and business can strengthen both sides. The new Employment Rights Bill will provide day one employment rights, improve statutory sick pay, end abusive practices like fire-and-rehire, and protect against exploitative zero-hours contracts.

  • Sarah Olney LD Richmond Park

    The Liberal Democrats support measures to strengthen employment rights but are concerned about the lack of detail in the Employment Rights Bill, which prevents long-term planning for businesses. They urge the Government to scrap national insurance increases and implement reforms such as a youth mobility scheme.

  • Steve Barclay Con North East Cambridgeshire

    My hon. Friend highlights flaws in the impact assessment and notes that the accumulation of different aspects of the Bill could lead to unintended consequences, such as easier strike action based on grievances. Asked about the additional costs and funding gap for social care due to the Bill.

  • Steve Yemm Lab Mansfield

    Asked the hon. Member for York Central whether she agrees that strengthening statutory sick pay is particularly important for lower-paid workers who cannot afford to take time off work without it, emphasising its significance in contrast to Opposition Members' views.

Government Response

Kate Dearden

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business and Trade

The Minister emphasised the positive impact of the Employment Rights Bill on employers and workers, declaring a commitment to full consultation with stakeholders. She thanked her predecessor and acknowledged extensive engagement from businesses and trade unions in shaping the Bill. Stressed that stronger employment rights are an investment in stability and growth. Discussed economic benefits outweighing costs, with a top-end estimate of £5 billion but likely much lower at around £1 billion. Highlighted support from businesses and organisations like the Resolution Foundation. Emphasised protection for young workers, women, people with disabilities, and ethnic minorities. Outlines the importance of extending sick pay to 1.3 million employees and mentions stress, depression or anxiety accounting for 17.1 million working days lost in 2022-23, equivalent to more than £5 billion of lost output annually. Emphasises phased implementation and engagement with businesses, highlighting the Secretary of State's efforts to build partnerships with business leaders.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy