Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

AI: Copyright in the Creative Industries

Wednesday 8 January 2025 · 2 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 1 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Ms Polly Billington thanked the Minister for their answer and highlighted the importance of copyright royalties for visual artists in Thanet.
  • Sir John Whittingdale questioned the Minister about the need for transparency in AI usage by creators and asked for assurances regarding government legislation.
  • The Minister acknowledged the importance of transparency and mentioned that the government's consultation aims to provide a win-win solution for both creators and AI developers.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

Visual artists earn below the minimum wage and rely on copyright royalties to sustain their work, contributing significantly to world-leading creative industries like those in Margate.

Question

I thank my hon. Friend for that answer. However, visual artists earn far below the minimum wage, and rely on copyright royalties to finance their work and continue to contribute to our world-leading creative industries—in Thanet and across the country. What reassurances can the Minister give that the plans for a copyright exception for AI learning will not further contribute to that financial instability and weaken the lifeblood of our creative economy?

Answer from The Minister for Data Protection and Telecoms (Chris Bryant)

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. She could big up her own constituency a little more, because Margate is probably one of the greatest centres of artists in this country. It is where Turner was trained and went to school, and where we have Turner Contemporary. It is also where Tracey Emin is doing so much work and many other artists as well. It is a brilliant hub. We want to make sure—as we did in the last Labour Government, when we introduced the artist’s resale right—that artists can earn a living from their art. That is what we are determined to do. Just as last year New Zealand and Australia entered into the same agreement for an artist’s resale right, we want to make sure that there is a future revenue stream for every single artist in this country.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not specifically address how AI copyright exceptions will impact artists' financial stability or provide concrete reassurances.

How: Big Up Her Own Constituency

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

Creators need to understand where their works are being used by AI developers for transparency and proper remuneration.

Question

Does the Minister agree that transparency is crucial if creators are to understand where their works are being used by AI developers? Can he therefore assure me that the Government will legislate on transparency whatever the outcome of the consultation on copyright reform?

Answer from The Minister for Data Protection and Telecoms (Chris Bryant)

The right hon. Gentleman makes a good point about transparency, which is a key element of our consultation. We have presented a package because we want to ensure there is a win-win here. We want AI developers to have the legal certainty that they need to develop their products in the UK as UK producers, and for creative industries to know when their works are being used, so that if they want to say no they can say no, and if they want to say yes they will be properly remunerated for it.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email