House of Commons · Westminster Hall
01 February 2023 · 6 other contributors · 8,773 words
Opened by Sarah Olney Lib Dem Richmond Park
Responding minister: George Freeman
Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.
Sarah Olney raised concerns about artificial intelligence: intellectual property rights in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key points
Key requests to Government
Olney asks the government to confirm that it will not proceed with the proposed all-out exception to copyright for text and data mining. She seeks assurances on thorough consultation with stakeholders, robust enforcement of current protections, and a regulatory framework protecting creative workers' rights while fostering AI innovation.
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.
Opened the debate
The rapid rise of AI poses significant challenges for the creative sector. Sarah Olney's survey found that nearly 600 copyrighted images were used without consent, and respondents feel AI is devaluing their work and impacting income. There are active legal battles regarding AI and IP rights. The IPO's text and data mining proposals have been met with resistance as they could undermine creators' rights and stifle future creativity.
The MP highlighted the importance of creative industries in the UK, contributing £115 billion to the economy before the pandemic. She criticised the Government's lack of engagement and regulation regarding AI proposals that could undermine creators' rights and income. She inquired whether the UK was lagging behind other jurisdictions like the US and EU regarding AI regulation, questioning if there had been any changes to the National Science and Technology Council.
I am concerned about how AI could exploit existing creative works without compensation for the original creators. The Government's response seems to dismiss rights holders' concerns and favour those who wish to benefit commercially from this data, which is detrimental to the creative economy. The MP questioned whether the Government is now minded not to introduce the proposed measures, seeking confirmation that the status quo would prevail for the time being.
Jim Shannon highlighted the significant impact of lockdowns on Northern Ireland's creative industry, noting that it employed around 25,000 people and contributed £1,088 million to the economy. He warned against AI proposals that could allow unauthorized use of creative works, potentially transferring value from creators to tech companies.
Explored the impact of AI on creativity by having an AI write a speech. Raised concerns about AI automating creative tasks without regard for copyright or original creators' moral rights.
Emphasised the importance of regulations for the cultural sector, particularly the music industry. Highlighted how rules protect creative talent and encourage sustainable growth in the industry. The MP asked for clarity on when a definitive policy would be produced following the Minister's statements.
The debate can technically run until 6.04 pm.
Government Response
George FreemanIt is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship and respond to the debate on AI intellectual property rights. The Minister thanks Sarah Olney for securing this debate and acknowledges the need for a balanced approach in regulating AI due to its rapid pace of development. He reassures that there will be no proceeding with previously proposed changes, highlighting an intention to engage deeply with stakeholders before formulating new proposals. The Minister emphasizes the importance of creating a regulatory framework that encourages innovation without stifling creativity or driving investors away from the UK. He mentions ongoing work on both a creative industry strategy and an AI regulatory strategy, aiming to anticipate future challenges posed by rapid technological advancements. There is recognition of the complexity in navigating existing regulations while identifying areas for improvement. The Minister commits to ensuring fair remuneration for creators and addressing issues related to data access and licensing. He also expresses interest in exploring more innovative consultation methods using digital technologies to better capture diverse perspectives in rapidly evolving industries.