Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

City Regions: Connectivity

Thursday 10 October 2024 · 4 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Answered 1 Partly answered 2 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Government are making a five-year, 5.7 billion investment to improve transport networks in eight city regions from 2022-23 to 2026-27.
  • Government have announced plans to introduce an English devolution Bill.
  • Government are reviewing infrastructure projects due to financial constraints.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Lisa Smart Lib Dem Hazel Grove
Transport
Context

The MP is concerned about improving transport connectivity within city regions.

Question

What steps her Department is taking to improve transport connectivity within city regions. The Government are making a five-year, £5.7 billion investment to improve the transport networks of eight city regions between 2022-23 to 2026-27 through the city region sustainable transport settlements.

Answer from Simon Lightwood

Up again! The Government are making a five-year, £5.7 billion investment to improve the transport networks of eight city regions between 2022-23 to 2026-27 through the city region sustainable transport settlements. We have announced plans to introduce an English devolution Bill, which, alongside our major bus and rail reforms, will equip mayors with the powers and influence that they need to create an integrated local transport network and improve local transport in their area.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q2 Lisa Smart Lib Dem Hazel Grove
Housing Transport Local Government
Context

The MP is concerned about funding clarity for the bus network in Hazel Grove.

Question

When my constituents in Hazel Grove travel to the centre of the city region, they can use the train service—subject to landslide issues and, of course, the whims of the train operating companies—but when they are moving around my constituency, they must rely on the bus network. Can the Minister give the Greater Manchester combined authority and my residents clarity about funding for the bus model in Greater Manchester, so that it is not the 10 constituent local authorities who are burdened with paying the price for keeping the £2 bus fare cap?

Answer from Simon Lightwood

I am proudly wearing my Bee Network badge this morning, having visited Greater Manchester to meet the operators of the Bee Network and Mayor Andy Burnham; that is trailblazing work in Greater Manchester. In the year in which the network has been operating, we have already seen a 5% increase in passenger numbers, and buses are turning up on time, which is always great. The question of funding for the future will of course be part of the spending review.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific ask about clarity on funding was not directly addressed; instead, the answer provided general information and referenced a future spending review.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q3 Nick Smith Lab Blaenau Gwent and Rhymney
Economy Transport
Context

The MP is concerned about the development of the Abertillery spur on the Ebbw Vale to Cardiff line.

Question

I was reading the Treasury's “Fixing the foundations” document, and I understand that because of the need to restore control over public spending, the Government have had to cancel the restoring your railway programme. However, I note that individual projects will be reconsidered in the Transport Secretary's review. Will the Minister please look at the development of the Abertillery spur on the Ebbw Vale to Cardiff line, as he considers good-value investment and connectivity in our railways infrastructure?

Answer from Simon Lightwood

The Government are reviewing a number of infrastructure projects in the light of the terrible financial situation that we find ourselves in, following the terrible damage inflicted on this country by the Opposition.

Not addressed: The specific ask about considering the Abertillery spur was not addressed; instead, the answer shifted to a critique of the previous government's actions and financial situation.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q4 Paul Kohler Lib Dem Wimbledon
Transport
Context

The MP is concerned about repeated track and signal failures on the District line and decreased frequency of service at stations due to ageing rolling stock.

Question

In London, connectivity is provided by Transport for London, but in my constituency of Wimbledon, despite its wonderful tube, tram, train and bus connections, my constituents suffer from repeated track and signal failures on the District line, while South Western Railway is labouring with ageing rolling stock and decreased frequency of service at stations such as Malden Manor and Worcester Park. What are the Government planning to do to address the capital funding crisis that they inherited from the Tories across London's transport system, and will the Minister meet me to discuss the problems affecting the District line and South Western trains?

Answer from Simon Lightwood

The Government remain committed to supporting London and the transport network on which it depends. We are working with the Mayor of London on funding plans for transport in the capital, to provide value for money and lasting benefits to the public. I would, of course, be delighted to meet the hon. Gentleman to discuss these matters.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific ask about concrete plans addressing the funding crisis was not directly answered; instead, the answer provided general support and an offer to meet.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email