Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Defence Funding: Efficient Spending

Monday 20 May 2024 · 5 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Answered 1 Partly answered 2 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Minister for Defence Procurement is working on the integrated procurement model to ensure efficient use of increased defence funding.
  • Government plans to build up to six new multi-role ships for the Royal Marines.
  • Response clarifies that HMS Albion and another ship used by the Royal Marines will remain in active service.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 James Daly
Defence
Context

The MP is concerned about the efficient use of increased defence spending.

Question

What steps he plans to take to ensure efficient use of increased defence funding.

Answer from Grant Shapps

I am committed to ensuring that the defence uplift to 2.5% means that we spend the money as efficiently as possible. The tremendous work by my hon. Friend the Minister for Defence Procurement on the integrated procurement model is very important to the outcome of that spending.

Partly answered

Not addressed: No specific steps or timelines were provided for ensuring efficient use of defence funding, only a commitment and mention of ongoing work.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q2 James Daly
Defence
Context

The MP is pleased to hear about the efficient use of defence spending and asks for more details on recent announcements regarding Royal Marine warships.

Question

I am very pleased to hear my right hon. Friend commit to the efficient use of defence spending, which we may not have seen in the past. Will he comment on the excellent example of his recent announcement on saving Royal Marine warships and the fact that this Government have committed to building up to six more for the commandos?

Answer from Grant Shapps

That is absolutely right. It is very important that our Royal Marines are able to continue their activities, so not only will we keep the existing ships running but we have announced that we will build up to six new multi-role ships, which is all part of our programme to build 28 ships.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q3 Samantha Dixon Lab Chester North and Neston
Defence
Context

The MP is asking about the return of HMS Albion artefacts and when the ship will be put to sea again after it was planned for mothballing.

Question

Because of Government plans to mothball HMS Albion, key artefacts from the ship, including the sword of peace, were given to Chester town hall for safekeeping. When would he like the artefacts back? Exactly when is HMS Albion going to be put to sea again?

Answer from Grant Shapps

We never announced that she was being mothballed, so I am very interested to hear about these artefacts. Once again, I can clarify that both those ships—both used by our Royal Marines—will remain in active service.

Partly answered

Not addressed: No specific timeline for when the ship will be put back into service or details on returning the artefacts were provided.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q4 Dave Doogan SNP Angus and Perthshire Glens
Defence
Context

The MP is questioning the efficiency of spending on refitting HMS Argyll, which was then paid off.

Question

Increased defence spending is obviously only a means to an end. It is not an end in itself. The Treasury rightly takes a jaundiced view of the MOD's ability to spend money wisely so, to that end, can the Secretary of State advise the House on how much taxpayers' money and defence budget was spent refitting HMS Argyll, only for her to be paid off immediately after she came out of refit?

Answer from Grant Shapps

There is no way that the Treasury, given its very tight hold on the fiscal regime, would approve spending 2.5% of GDP on defence if it did not have confidence in how we will spend it.

Not addressed: The specific amount spent was avoided and instead focus shifted to overall confidence in spending decisions.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q5 Dave Doogan SNP Angus and Perthshire Glens
Defence
Context

The MP is upset about not getting an answer to previous questions on HMS Argyll's fate, seeking clarification on who approached whom.

Question

I am unsurprised that I got no answer to my question because I never got an answer to that question on 8 January or to my point of order on 24 March. Will the Secretary of State tell me a different answer: did BAE Systems approach the MOD to buy HMS Argyll, or did the MOD approach BAE Systems?

Answer from Grant Shapps

I am pleased that the hon. Gentleman recognises that my hon. Friend the Minister for Defence Procurement has written to him on the subject, and I have no doubt that he will wish to engage with the hon. Gentleman further.

Not addressed: The specific transaction details were avoided in favor of referencing previous correspondence and future engagement.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)