Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Defence Sector: UK-based Jobs

Monday 11 September 2023 · 4 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 1 Partly answered 2 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Minister of Defence investment supports over 200,000 jobs across UK industries.
  • Debate continues on the balance between buying off-the-shelf products and developing sovereign defence capabilities.
  • Minister declined to comment on operational details of submarines due to sensitivity.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

The question follows a debate on defence procurement and job creation in the UK's defence industry.

Question

What steps he is taking to help increase the number of UK-based jobs in the defence sector. The latest estimates suggest that Ministry of Defence investment supports over 200,000 jobs in industries across the UK.

Answer from James Cartlidge

The latest estimates suggest that Ministry of Defence investment supports over 200,000 jobs in industries across the UK. I believe that the best way to keep growing jobs in defence is to back the British defence industry. That is why I am delighted to confirm that, this week in London, we are hosting the biggest ever DSEI—Defence and Security Equipment International—showcasing the very best of the British defence industry, with companies large and small.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

The previous Defence Secretary prioritized British jobs over purchasing from America, but The Times reported a conflict with the Prime Minister regarding helicopter purchases.

Question

Can the Minister assure the House that the Secretary of State will stand up for British jobs and research and development or is our only hope to replace him with my right hon. Friend the Member for Wentworth and Dearne (John Healey)?

Answer from James Cartlidge

Debate is ongoing in defence procurement, and has been for many years, about the difference between buying off-the-shelf and having our own sovereign capability. The fact is that, until we brought out the defence and security industrial strategy in 2021, arguably the default position of the MOD was to go primarily for value for money. Since DSIS, we have a more flexible and balanced approach, seen in many specific procurements, where we give much greater weighting to social value and local content.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answer acknowledges ongoing debates but does not provide a clear commitment or assurance regarding the Secretary of State's stance on prioritizing British jobs and R&D.

How: Debate Is Ongoing

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q3 Mark Francois Con Rayleigh and Wickford
Context

The Sunday press reported Babcock's poor record on surface ships and submarines refits, with delays impacting the Royal Navy.

Question

Will Minister get the senior directors of Babcock into the Department for an interview without coffee and ask them to raise their game for the benefit of the Navy and the defence of the realm?

Answer from James Cartlidge

I have the greatest respect for my right hon. Friend, but he will appreciate that we do not comment on the operational availability of submarines, which is a particularly sensitive matter. However, he is absolutely right that we need to focus on the time it is taking to bring ships and all aspects of our fleet back into service. I confirm that I regularly engage with Babcock, and I will visit Devonport very soon.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answer avoids addressing the specific request for a meeting without coffee and focuses on general engagement.

How: Operational Availability Is Sensitive

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q4 Maria Eagle Lab Liverpool Garston
Context

The Government have wasted £15 billion on defence procurement and lost over 30,000 jobs in the industry since 2010.

Question

Does the Minister accept that preventing another 13 years of Tory failure is key to increasing the number of UK-based jobs in the defence sector, backing British industry and British military resilience?

Answer from James Cartlidge

I welcome the right hon. Lady to her new position as my ministerial shadow. We are very proud of our record, because in the past year or so we have been faced with a war on our doorstep in Europe, and procurement has risen to the occasion. Defence Equipment and Support in Abbey Wood has delivered kit to Ukraine in record speed. We have seen the acquisition of equipment such as the Archer on a quick basis, to fit our requirements.

Not addressed: The answer shifts focus to recent successes without addressing past failures or preventing future ones.

How: Pride In Current Record

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email