Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Two-child Limit: Child Poverty

Monday 4 September 2023 · 5 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 2 Not answered 0

Key points

  • The Government believes that work is the best route out of poverty.
  • The Government states that a benefit system adjusting for family size is unsustainable.
  • The Government will spend around 276 billion through the welfare system in 2023-24.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

The MP seeks to understand the government's assessment of the potential impact of the two-child benefit limit on trends in child poverty. She highlights concerns over rising child poverty rates and the disproportionate effect on larger families.

Question

What assessment has the Department made of the potential impact of the two-child limit on trends in the level of child poverty? I am concerned about recent studies indicating that policies such as the benefit cap and wider benefit cuts are pushing more children into hardship, particularly those from larger families. A report by the Child Poverty Action Group found that abolishing the policy would be highly effective in reducing child poverty.

Answer from Guy Opperman

The Government's firm belief is that the best route out of poverty is through work. In 2021-22, there were 400,000 fewer children living in absolute poverty after housing costs than in 2009-10.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The assessment of the two-child limit's impact on child poverty trends and the specific ask to abolish it

How: Focusing On Work As A Solution, Citing Overall Reduction In Absolute Poverty

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

A University of York study suggests that the two-child limit and benefit cap contribute to rising child poverty. The MP challenges the government to acknowledge this evidence and reverse these policies.

Question

A recent study by the University of York found that the two-child limit and the benefit cap had contributed to rising child poverty, impacting larger families disproportionately. Given the growing weight of evidence showing real harm from welfare policies, will the Government finally acknowledge this and reverse them?

Answer from Guy Opperman

Families on benefits should face similar financial choices regarding family size as those who support themselves through work. A benefit system that adjusts automatically based on family size is unsustainable.

Not addressed: The specific ask to acknowledge harm and reverse policies

How: Discussing The Sustainability Of A Benefits System

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

The Child Poverty Action Group reported that abolishing the two-child limit would be highly effective in reducing child poverty. The MP asks why the government will not take this action.

Question

A report by the Child Poverty Action Group showed that the two-child limit affects one in 10 children across the UK, with abolition being a cost-effective measure to reduce child poverty. Why will the Minister not take this action? Is child poverty low on his priority list?

Answer from Guy Opperman

The Government are committed to a sustainable long-term approach to tackling poverty and supporting people on low incomes. We will spend around £276 billion through the welfare system in 023-24, including about £124 billion on working-age individuals and children.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific ask to abolish the two-child limit

How: Highlighting Government Commitment, Citing Overall Welfare Spending

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

The MP questions the number of people who have had to prove they were raped in order to receive an exemption from the two-child limit.

Question

The Minister seems unaware that the two-child limit affects those on in-work benefits. Only if a woman can prove her third or subsequent child is due to rape does she qualify for an exemption. How many women has his Department asked to provide proof of rape to get this exemption?

Answer from Guy Opperman

We do not use such language but will write to him.

Not addressed: The specific ask for a number of people proving rape

How: Avoiding The Question About Proof

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

The MP expresses disappointment that the government does not know how many women have been asked to prove rape for exemptions. He mentions Labour party support for similar policies and criticizes future Conservative governments for maintaining high child poverty rates.

Question

I am disappointed that the Minister cannot provide this number, as his Department has made 2,590 women prove they were raped in order to get an exemption. Will he feel comfort knowing that if George Osborne's legacy continues under Labour's Blairite leadership, astronomical child poverty rates will persist?

Answer from Guy Opperman

Compared to 2009-10, there are 400,000 fewer children in absolute poverty after housing costs.

Not addressed: The specific ask about future government policies and comfort with child poverty rates

How: Citing Reduction In Absolute Poverty

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email