Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Personal Independence Payments: People with Disabilities

Monday 24 April 2023 · 3 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 3 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Government plans to trial specialist assessors for PIP applications with knowledge of specific health conditions.
  • Government will provide more detail on the conditions covered and training for specialist assessors when possible.
  • Minister offered to review a specific case of a bedbound constituent experiencing delays in PIP assessments.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

A Work and Pensions Committee report highlighted psychological distress experienced by individuals due to the health assessment required for PIP applications. This includes concerns about the lack of support and the mismatch between assessed needs.

Question

The report by the Work and Pensions Committee found that people experience 'psychological distress' due to the health assessment required as part of the PIP application process. Many constituents feel the process does not reflect their needs and are concerned about a lack of support. The Government promised to trial specialist assessors with knowledge of specific health conditions. Can you clarify which conditions will be covered and how these assessors will be trained?

Answer from Tom Pursglove

When we are able, we will set out more detail of the relevant conditions and the approach we will take in delivering on this commitment. I raised the issue with officials to progress it as quickly as possible. We see real benefit in matching assessors with specialisms to people with particular conditions. We want to reduce PIP journey times as much as feasibly possible, get more decisions right first time, and focus on quality.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific details about which conditions are covered and how the assessors will be trained were not provided.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

A constituent's report highlighted the psychological distress caused by the PIP application health assessment. Many feel their needs are not adequately addressed, leading to concerns about support availability.

Question

The Government promised to trial specialist assessors with knowledge of specific health conditions for PIP applications. Can you clarify which conditions will be covered and how these assessors will be trained?

Answer from Tom Pursglove

When we are able, we will set out more detail of the relevant conditions and the approach we will take in delivering on this commitment. I raised the issue with officials to progress it as quickly as possible. We see real benefit in matching assessors with specialisms to people with particular conditions.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific details about which conditions are covered and how the assessors will be trained were not provided.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q3 Ellie Reeves Lab Lewisham West and East Dulwich
Context

A bedbound constituent relies on food banks and needs help with basic tasks, yet her PIP assessment is delayed for four months. Concerns arise over families relying on food banks during the waiting period.

Question

I have a bedbound constituent who uses food banks due to delays in PIP assessments. Her children take on necessary tasks. How can you justify this situation? What actions will be taken?

Answer from Tom Pursglove

I refer to my earlier remarks on improving PIP journey times. I am keen to look at this specific case if provided with details. We want people to have certainty on their PIP claim as quickly as possible. I encourage people to apply for PIP if they believe they might be eligible.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific justification for long wait times and clear actions to address delays were not provided.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email