Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Topical Questions

Monday 13 March 2023 · 14 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 6 Partly answered 5 Not answered 0

Key points

  • The 77th Brigade monitors social media for disinformation and misinformation originating from abroad, not for opinion.
  • The Secretary of State agrees that defence spending is not discretionary and is crucial for state security.
  • The Defence Secretary acknowledges Labour's support for AUKUS and the importance of developing collaboration on artificial intelligence, cyber, and hypersonic missiles.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Alistair Carmichael Lib Dem Orkney and Shetland
Context

The MP referenced a report showing that the British Army's 77th Brigade monitored social media posts of British citizens in 2020 for Cabinet Office reports.

Question

Will the Secretary of State tell the House: is the 77th Brigade still monitoring social media posts of British citizens, and, if so, for what purpose and under what authority?

Answer from Ben Wallace

One part of the 77th Brigade's role is to challenge disinformation, not opinion—its role is not to monitor or counter opinion, as that is about the freedom we all enjoy in our society. The 77th Brigade is on the lookout for media manipulation of misinformation or lies from abroad, and where that is found, it is flagged to the appropriate authorities.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q2 Julian Lewis Con New Forest East
Context

The MP discussed the importance of investing in defence now to avoid higher costs later, referencing historical GDP spending on defence.

Question

May I ask him to bear in mind when negotiating with the Treasury that any investment made in defence now for the purposes of conventional deterrence will be miniscule compared with what we would have to spend if, heaven forbid, the war in Ukraine escalated into a war with NATO? Such spending is an investment; it is not expenditure that should be lightly considered. It is essential for our future security.

Answer from Ben Wallace

I completely concur with my right hon. Friend. Defence is not a discretionary spend and not an add-on; it is a core function of any state and especially of this Government. I have been very grateful since 2020 that we have turned the corner on this and started to rebuild that momentum.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q3 John Healey Lab Rawmarsh and Conisbrough
Context

The MP expressed gratitude for the Defence Secretary's update on Op Shader activity and inquired about AUKUS pillar 2 collaboration beyond submarine construction.

Question

Does the Defence Secretary recognise that this has Labour's fullest support? We want Britain to play the biggest possible role in building the new Australian submarines. But beyond the subs, how will he develop the pillar 2 collaboration on artificial intelligence, cyber and hypersonic missiles?

Answer from Ben Wallace

I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman for his support for AUKUS, which is a decades-long commitment. One of the most important works we are doing—and we met in the Pentagon in December—is clearing away the International Traffic in Arms Regulations challenges that for so many years have held us back in being able to share our own technology with the United States or to collaborate properly to make a step change to give us the strategic advantage we need.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

The MP inquired about the Secretary of State's meeting with his French counterpart and future collaboration.

Question

France is our closest security partner other than the United States, so can my right hon. Friend update the House on his meeting with his French counterpart? How will we continue to ensure that our historic defence partnership is ready to take on the threats of the future?

Answer from Ben Wallace

My hon. Friend is incredibly right to point out how important France is to us. It is our main partner in Europe. A partnership on which we worked was more of the CJEF—the Combined Joint Expeditionary Force—where we work with them, training and exercising together; there is more work on complex weapons through MBDA, which is a great international consortium with factories in Bolton and Stevenage.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q5 Ruth Jones Lab Newport West and Islwyn
Context

The Labour Party's dossier highlights at least £15 billion of taxpayers' money wasted since 2010 in the Ministry of Defence.

Question

It is good to see you back in your place, Madam Deputy Speaker. Given that Labour's dossier has found at least £15 billion of taxpayers' money wasted since 2010, can the Minister explain why this Tory Government have failed to get a grip on the defence procurement process and secure value for money?

Answer from Ben Wallace

I would point constituents to the 2010 National Audit Office report on Labour's Government, which highlighted issues with aircraft carrier contracts. Additionally, the Public Accounts Committee under the right hon. Member for Barking (Dame Margaret Hodge) noted delays and cancellations in land systems programmes that resulted in capability gaps until 2025.

Not addressed: The answer does not directly address why this government failed to improve procurement, instead pointing to issues under the previous Labour government.

How: Redirecting Blame, Referencing Past Failures

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q6 Mark Francois Con Rayleigh and Wickford
Context

The Clive Sheldon KC review, which is crucial for understanding issues with the Ajax programme, has been with the Department for over a month.

Question

May I also say that it is great to see you back in your place, Madam Deputy Speaker? Given the importance of the Clive Sheldon KC review on Ajax management information, can the Minister guarantee publication by Easter recess and ensure full unredaction?

Answer from Alex Chalk

I thank my right hon. Friend for his concern; the Sheldon review is independent, provided an initial draft to the MOD in January, and is currently undergoing fact-checking and Maxwellisation exercises. Once received by the Department, it will be published promptly with a statement to the House.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answer does not guarantee publication by Easter recess or confirm full unredaction.

How: Hedging Language

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q7 Dan Jarvis Lab Barnsley North
Context

The Prime Minister's comments on the integrated review refresh indicate no target for reaching 2.5% of GDP in defence spending and that the Army will not receive £3 billion needed to avoid further cuts.

Question

It is good to see you in your place, Madam Deputy Speaker. Given the PM's statements on the lack of a target for 2.5% of GDP in defence spending and no guarantee of an additional £3 billion for the Army to prevent cuts, is this beneficial for Defence?

Answer from Ben Wallace

Firstly, I am not sure where the hon. Gentleman gets that we will not get the 3% to avoid cuts; our equipment programme and envelope are on track subject to inflation pressures and operational commitments. We have had extra £560 million for restocking ammunition and other commitments from the Treasury.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answer does not directly address whether this approach benefits Defence, instead focusing on specifics of funding.

How: Hedging Language, Redirecting

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

Environmental, social and governance criteria are making it difficult for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to raise capital and invest.

Question

What steps is my right hon. Friend's Department taking to support SMEs in the defence sector that are affected by ESG criteria?

Answer from Alex Chalk

My hon. Friend champions SMEs, which are crucial for a vibrant and flexible UK defence industry; the Department helps find and fund exploitable ideas from SMEs; there is no contradiction between ESG principles and defence industry needs.

Not addressed: The answer does not address specific steps being taken to help SMEs affected by ESG criteria.

How: Redirecting, Stating General Principles

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q9 Matt Rodda Lab Reading Central
Context

Negotiations are ongoing between the Ministry and the Government of Nepal regarding retired Gurkha soldiers living in poverty.

Question

It is good to see you in your place, Madam Deputy Speaker. Many retired Gurkhas live in poverty due to leaving the Army before 1997; ongoing negotiations with Nepal exist. Can a Minister update me on this important issue?

Answer from Andrew Murrison

I recently set up a joint committee chaired by myself and the Nepalese ambassador to consider outstanding Gurkha welfare issues; retrospective pension changes have been through multiple judicial institutions, with UK Government positions upheld; I am keen to ensure we do everything possible to support Gurkhas' welfare.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answer does not provide a clear update on the current status of negotiations.

How: Hedging Language

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q10 Danny Kruger Reform East Wiltshire
Context

The Government committed £2 billion to resupplying armed forces and investing in Army accommodation.

Question

I am delighted to hear about the £2 billion commitment for resupplying our armed forces. The importance of investment in Army accommodation will be welcome news to constituents in Tidworth, Bulford and Larkhill. Can the Secretary of State tell us what it would take to convince the Treasury that we must do more than simply resupply our armed forces and need a bigger Army?

Answer from Ben Wallace

The Chancellor and Prime Minister recognised Defence would need more spending; they already gave us an extra £24 billion; I need to ensure we lock in this spending at future comprehensive spending reviews for long-term planning.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answer does not address what it will take to convince the Treasury beyond resupplying forces.

How: Hedging Language

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q11 Toby Perkins Lab Chesterfield
Context

The question arises from criticisms that the government has underfunded the armed forces over a period of time, affecting their capability. The Defence Secretary previously acknowledged this issue.

Question

It is great to see you back in your place, Madam Deputy Speaker. To be fair to the Defence Secretary, he has been very candid that 13 years of this Government have, in his words, “hollowed out and underfunded” our armed forces, but why should anyone believe that, in their final gasps, the exhausted Government who underfunded them over 13 years will actually put right the hollowing-out they have put in place in that time?

Answer from Ben Wallace

Maybe the hon. Gentleman cannot hear: I did not say “13”; I said there had been “30” years of hollowing out, which includes his last Government, a Government I served under as a soldier. His Government spent a lot of money going to war in the middle east, which hollowed us out too, because we were not properly refunded.

Not addressed: The specific ask about putting right the hollowing-out was not addressed; instead, the Defence Secretary attacked the opposition and their past actions.

How: Attacking Opposition, Changing Subject

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

Residents have opened their homes to Ukrainians, and there is a concern about the kit being sent along with proper training.

Question

I thank Carshalton and Wallington residents who have opened their homes to Ukrainians. Can my right hon. Friend give me some assurance that the kit we are sending to Ukraine will indeed come with the specialist support and training needed to operate it?

Answer from Ben Wallace

In the UK, we have thousands of British armed forces, joined by Canadians, Norwegians, Dutch, Swedish, Lithuanians, Australians and New Zealanders—endless numbers of people—helping the Ukrainians with that training. We ensure that not only do they train there, but when they go to somewhere such as Germany they get combined arms training. It is important that training accompanies equipment and, where we have had feedback, we have corrected the training as well.

Answered

Not addressed: null

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

There are concerns about the direction of threats to the country, especially from China, and questions regarding the Secretary of State's role in addressing these.

Question

Madam Deputy Speaker, I have really missed you. Can I ask the Secretary of State what he makes of what President Xi has been saying over the past few days? I urge him today not to do what people are rumouring that he might do—that, given the present situation, he might be thinking about resigning. Will he stay with us, but fight for more money for our armed forces?

Answer from Ben Wallace

As a Tory, you think about resigning most of the time—over the years. I am interested in trying to deliver for the men and women of our armed forces. I went into politics because the men and women of the armed forces needed and deserved better, and I am determined to try to stick that through.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific ask about increased funding was not directly addressed; instead, focus was on staying in position.

How: Vague Response

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

The Chair has seen the long shelves at Norcross where Veterans UK is based, highlighting issues with record management.

Question

Thank you very much, Madam Deputy Speaker; it is lovely to see you back. As a former chair of the south-east region for the Veterans Advisory and Pensions Committees, I have seen at first hand the long shelves at Norcross where Veterans UK is based. Can the Minister assure me that the digitalisation of veterans' records will proceed quickly, so that veterans can get quick decisions on their welfare and their welfare claims?

Answer from Andrew Murrison

I pay tribute to my hon. Friend's service with the VAPC. Like me, she has been to Norcross and seen the extraordinary files of paperwork. There is no way that we can provide the 21st-century service that our veterans deserve while things are in that state, so the £40 million digitalisation—though it may sound banal—will most certainly make a huge difference.

Answered

Not addressed: null

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email