Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

National Security Strategy 2025-06-24

24 June 2025 · 26 other contributors

Opened by Pat McFadden Lab Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Pat McFadden raised concerns about national security strategy 2025-06-24 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • The Prime Minister will attend the NATO summit to commit to increasing national security spending to 5% of GDP by 2035.
  • The UK's strategy includes protecting domestic security, strengthening international presence, and boosting sovereign and asymmetric capabilities.
  • The minister highlighted the importance of energy security, the nuclear deterrent, and legal safeguards in AI development.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Pat McFadden Lab Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster

The Prime Minister will attend the NATO summit where a new commitment to grow spending on national security to 5% of GDP by 2035 is expected. The UK's strategy focuses on protecting security at home, promoting strength abroad, and increasing sovereign and asymmetric capabilities. It includes bolstering defence industries, enhancing cyber capability, anti-corruption measures, and investing in research and development.

Other contributors (26)
  • Priti Patel Con Witham

    Welcomes actions that build on previous government measures but calls for a plan to reach the NATO target of 3% by the end of this Parliament. Questions the inclusion of costs in the 1.5% target and highlights concerns about China's influence, including the foreign influence registration scheme and the China super-embassy spy hub.

  • Pat McFadden Lab Constituency Not Mentioned

    Defended the Government's approach towards national security, committing to increasing defence expenditure to 2.5% of GDP and outlining a balanced strategy with respect to China that prioritises both economic interests and national security.

  • Sarah Olney Lib Dem Richmond Park

    Welcomed the publication but urged for more substantial actions, specifically calling for cross-party talks on increasing defence spending to 5% of GDP as per NATO targets. Emphasised the need for resilience and protecting democracy from hostile actors.

  • Emily Thornberry Lab Islington South and Finsbury

    Asked for guidance on how to address instances of China’s espionage, interference in democracy, and undermining economic security. Highlighted the need for advice given to regions when dealing with China.

  • Matt Western Lab Warwick and Leamington

    Complimented the comprehensive national security strategy and enquired about coherence across different strategies and ensuring a cultural change in facing security threats.

  • Alex Baker Lab Aldershot

    Welcomes the national security strategy, emphasising Aldershot's role in UK’s security and resilience with Standing Joint Command HQ. Asks for details on work done on national resilience strategy.

  • Iain Duncan Smith Con Chingford and Woodford Green

    Expresses astonishment at the minimal coverage of China in the strategy, questioning its adequacy given the Intelligence and Security Committee's report. Asks for more comprehensive statements on China.

  • Chris Vince Lab/Co-op Harlow

    Appreciates the government's top priority of keeping residents safe but raises concern over health security, advocating for Harlow to be home to the UK Health Security Agency.

  • Edward Morello LD West Dorset

    Queries whether food security will influence policy changes at DEFRA. Notes recent sanitary and phytosanitary agreement with EU as beneficial for farmers and food producers in the UK.

  • Johanna Baxter Lab Paisley and Renfrewshire South

    Highlights importance of biosecurity against biological incidents, accidents, and attacks. Inquires about investment plans to protect the country from bio-threats.

  • Tom Tugendhat Con Tonbridge

    Welcomes the strategy but criticises lack of significant changes over 15 years. Draws attention to technological advancements like AI and their implications for national security.

  • Scott Arthur Lab Edinburgh South West

    Expresses welcome towards increased defence spending, suggesting potential economic benefits for the UK's defence sector if allied nations increase spending as well.

  • Robin Swann UUP South Antrim

    Highlights importance of protecting subsea cables in North Atlantic and along west coast of Ireland. Asks if Government has approached Irish Government for support in this regard.

  • Jessica Toale Lab Bournemouth West

    Welcomes focus on science and technology, asking how the strategy will support growth and security in her constituency and across south-west England.

  • Neil Shastri-Hurst Con Solihull West and Shirley

    Questions Britain's societal resilience against foreign influence operations. Asks for clear Government messaging to protect free speech and debate, suggesting expansion of defending democracy taskforce.

  • Louise Jones Lab North East Derbyshire

    Welcomes defence measures but focuses on energy security. Questions how the strategy will improve energy security and prevent future situations like those resulting from Ukraine war.

  • Welcomed the Government’s commitment to defence industries and investment in Edinburgh university's supercomputer. Acknowledged the importance of dialogue with the Scottish Government for educational and economic growth opportunities.

  • Gurinder Singh Josan Lab Smethwick

    Supported the attempt to renew and refresh key alliances, highlighting India as a strategic ally. Asked about how the Government are strengthening defence security relationships with countries like India in the Indo-Pacific region.

  • Nick Timothy Con West Suffolk

    Expressed concern over misuse of sections 4 and 5 of the Public Order Act and decisions regarding Islamophobia definition, questioning their impact on British society's freedoms.

  • Connor Rand Lab Altrincham and Sale West

    Stressed the importance of energy security to national security. Criticised some Conservative Members for disagreeing with investment in nuclear power and small modular reactors without standing up against it.

  • Joshua Reynolds LD Maidenhead

    Asked about legal safeguards and domestic checks and balances needed as new technologies like AI are developed, seeking reassurance on protection of UK citizens' civil liberties.

  • Adam Thompson Lab Erewash

    Requested confirmation that the Government remains committed to the nuclear deterrent and asked how today’s announcement will support the nuclear manufacturing industry in the east midlands.

  • David Reed Con Exmouth and Exeter East

    Highlighted Labour's rhetoric on food security being national security but questioned if current policy adequately addresses resilience of domestic food supply chains against climate change risks.

  • Jim Allister TUV North Antrim

    Asked how controlling borders and immigration would work out with the open border between Ireland and the UK, seeking clarity on planned reforms to legal immigration system.

  • Cameron Thomas LD Tewkesbury

    Echoed comments about Chinese Communist party, questioned if lasting peace in Europe means terminating Putin’s European ambitions in Ukraine, and asked how the UK will convey this to US Administration.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Asked for clarification on current spending figures on broader security beyond defence expenditure, including agencies like MI5, MI6, GCHQ, counter-terrorism, and police forces.

Government Response

Addressed concerns about misuse of public order act sections and Islamophobia definition by highlighting robust debate in British society. Emphasised importance of energy security to national security and commitment to nuclear deterrent. Acknowledged need for legal safeguards with AI development but highlighted potential benefits. Reaffirmed support for Ukraine and planned China audit.

Shadow Response

None

Defended the Government's approach towards national security, committing to increasing defence expenditure to 2.5% of GDP and outlining a balanced strategy with respect to China that prioritises both economic interests and national security.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy