Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Women’s State Pension Age: Additional Support

Monday 31 October 2022 · 3 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • John Martin McDonnell asked the Minister about providing additional support to women affected by the state pension age rise during winter 2022-23.
  • The Minister stated that a range of support is available for those of state pension age and those on low income.
  • The Minister declined to meet with affected individuals due to an ongoing investigation into the matter.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 John Martin McDonnell Lab Hayes and Harlington
Context

Women born in the 1950s were not properly notified about an increase in state pension age, leading to a sense of grievance and injustice. The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman has recognised this as maladministration.

Question

If he will take steps to provide additional support during winter 2022-23 to women affected by the rise in state pension age. Members across the House will have appreciated the sense of grievance and injustice from women born in the 1950s who were not given proper notice of the rise in the state pension age.

Answer from Laura Trott

A wide range of support is available to those of state pension age and for those on low income who are entitled to pensioner benefits.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answer does not address the specific ask for additional winter 2022-23 support.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q2 John Martin McDonnell Lab Hayes and Harlington
Context

Women born in the 1950s have suffered from a lack of proper notice about state pension age increases, leading to maladministration as recognised by the ombudsman. Since then, more women are living in poverty and 200,000 have died.

Question

Members across the House will have appreciated the sense of grievance and injustice from women born in the 1950s who were not given proper notice of the rise in the state pension age. The ombudsman has recognised this as maladministration, the right hon. Member for Uxbridge and South Ruislip (Boris Johnson), when he was the Prime Minister and leading the campaign in the 2019 general election, said he would address this matter. Since then, more of those women are now living in poverty and 200,000 of them have died, yet not a single Minister has met them since 2016. Is the Minister willing to meet a delegation from the WASPI campaign to talk about their plight and find a way forward?

Answer from Laura Trott

I thank the right hon. Gentleman for his question and understand where he is coming from, but there is an ongoing investigation so it would be inappropriate for me to meet people at this stage.

Not addressed: The specific ask about meeting the delegation was avoided by citing an ongoing investigation.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

In July 2021, the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman found the DWP guilty of maladministration regarding state pension age increases affecting 3.8 million women.

Question

The Minister knows that in July 2021 the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman found the DWP guilty of maladministration regarding state pension age increases. The PHSO also suggested that the Department could consider being proactive in remedying the injustice suffered by 3.8 million women, rather than waiting for its final conclusions. Given the ongoing cost of living crisis, does the Minister agree that now is the time for the Government to step up to the plate and agree fair and swift compensation for the women suffering that injustice?

Answer from Laura Trott

I am sorry to disappoint the hon. Gentleman but I must repeat that I cannot comment where there is an ongoing investigation.

Not addressed: The specific ask about fair and swift compensation was avoided by citing an ongoing investigation.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)