Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Unduly Lenient Sentence Scheme

Thursday 9 July 2020 · 2 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 2 Partly answered 0 Not answered 0

Key points

  • The scheme has extended recent sentences for serious crimes.
  • A case involved streaming child sexual abuse images online.
  • The offender's sentence was increased from one year and eight months to four years.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Marco Longhi Con Dudley South
Context

The Unduly Lenient Sentence Scheme allows for the review of sentences handed down in Crown Court cases if they are considered too lenient.

Question

What recent sentences she has extended through the unduly lenient sentence scheme?

Answer from Michael Ellis (The Solicitor General)

The scheme has had a number of recent successes. I am pleased to inform the House of two in particular. A recent case dealt with horrific offending concerning streaming child sexual abuse images online. The offender's sentence was increased from one year and eight months' imprisonment to four years' imprisonment after I referred it. That was the first increase since that particular offence was brought within the scheme. In addition, I personally went to court to present the first controlling and coercive unduly lenient sentence. The sentence was increased from a two-year community order to three years' immediate imprisonment.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q2 Marco Longhi Con Dudley South
Context

The importance of public perception regarding the justice system and sentence appropriateness.

Question

Does the Solicitor General recognise the importance of the fact that the punishment must fit the crime, for public confidence and also for my Dudley constituents?

Answer from Michael Ellis (The Solicitor General)

My hon. Friend is absolutely right to speak up for his constituents in Dudley on this matter. Public confidence in sentencing is crucial, and I am delighted to say that the general public do have and should have confidence in sentencing. The reality is that a very tiny fraction—far less than 1%—has to be referred to the Court of Appeal for a review of sentence for undue leniency. In his area, he might be interested to know of a case where a sentence of two and a half years for possession of a sawn-off shotgun and other material was increased to five years when it was referred by me for a review.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email