Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Aviation Sector: Worker Protection

Thursday 2 July 2020 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • James Murray asked about a constituent facing job loss or reduced terms at British Airways.
  • The Chancellor announced an unprecedented package to support businesses including the aviation sector.
  • The Government is ready to hear from businesses needing further support beyond the announced package.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 James Murray Labour (Co-op) East Renfrewshire
Context

British Airways is planning significant job cuts and contract changes during the pandemic.

Question

A constituent of mine who has worked for British Airways for over 20 years faces losing their job or being rehired on worse pay and terms. BA needs to halt its plans and the Government have not yet brought forward an aviation sector deal as promised three months ago. When will an aviation deal be announced, and will it extend the job retention scheme for aviation workers and include conditions to protect jobs, firms, and pay?

Answer from Kelly Tolhurst (Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Small Business, Consumers and Corporate Responsibility)

The Chancellor has announced an unprecedented package to support businesses including the aviation sector. The Government stand ready to hear from businesses needing further support. My sympathies are with those affected by redundancies or changes in terms and conditions. It is right that employees should be treated fairly, and I hope BA and unions continue working together towards a proper resolution.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The Minister did not confirm the release date of an aviation sector deal or specific protections within it.

How: Refused To Provide A Timeline For An Aviation Deal, Did Not Specify Job Retention Scheme Extension

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email