Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Marine Renewables: Fiscal Support

Tuesday 24 March 2020 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 1 Partly answered 0 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Alistair Carmichael asked the minister about discussions with Cabinet colleagues on fiscal support for marine renewable energy sources.
  • The minister mentioned that there are 1,700 people employed in marine renewables across Orkney and Shetland, Wales, and Scotland.
  • The minister noted that the previous Exchequer Secretary received a letter regarding this issue but did not have time to respond before changing roles.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Alistair Carmichael Lib Dem Orkney and Shetland
Context

The UK Government aims to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, encouraging the use of low-carbon technologies such as marine renewables. However, there is a concern that without sufficient fiscal support, companies will move their operations overseas.

Question

What discussions have you had with Cabinet colleagues regarding fiscal support for the development of marine renewable energy sources? The industry has proposed an innovation power purchase agreement to help bridge the gap between research and commercial deployment but are facing delays from the government. Developers cannot wait indefinitely, they will take their projects elsewhere if necessary.

Answer from John Glen (Minister of State for Scotland, Wales and Regions)

I am aware of 1,700 people working in marine renewables across Orkney and Shetland, Wales, and Scotland. The previous Exchequer Secretary received a letter on this matter but did not have time to respond before moving roles. Currently, marine renewables cost five times more than wind or solar technologies, making it challenging for them to compete without significant support. Nonetheless, the Government is open to engaging in dialogue with the industry as we work towards resolving these issues and progressing forward constructively.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)