Kemi Badenoch
MP for North West Essex
Con
Questions Asked by This MP
Parliamentary questions and government responses.
Response classifications show how directly each question was answered.
Warrington has changed enormously, but much of Warrington hospital was built in a different century for a much smaller population, and Broomfields leisure centre is at the end of its life with its pool closed. Will the Prime Minister come to Warrington, meet me, and set out how the Government will deliver the infrastructure that my constituents deserve?
Context
The questioner mentions the need for infrastructure development in Warrington, a town that has changed enormously but whose infrastructure has not kept up.
Andy Burnham
I am a regular visitor to Warrington and I believe it is a success story and a jewel in the north-west crown. It needs new infrastructure, including a remodelled Warrington Bank Quay and improved connectivity. The Prime Minister will back grassroots sport and is happy to talk to the hon. Friend about the leisure centre mentioned.
Assessment
The answer does not fully commit to meeting the questioner to set out specific infrastructure plans.
Will Discuss
Session: PMQs 2026-09-09
View Full Session -->
The Prime Minister seems to think that the last Government was a Conservative one. They were a Labour Government that failed, which is why Keir Starmer resigned. The Prime Minister talks about their record as if it was fantastic, but it was not. Other countries are making claims over our sovereign territory because they smell weakness. Is the Prime Minister just continuity Keir?
Context
The questioner criticises the government's leadership and the Prime Minister's handling of defence funding and policy.
Andy Burnham
The right hon. Lady mentions leadership. Britain needs to show leadership in taking action against injustice and unfairness. Britain stands for fairness against injustice on the world stage. The Government will always stand with the underdog and take action to support them.
Assessment
The answer does not address the specific leadership issues raised by the questioner.
Changed The Subject
Session: PMQs 2026-09-09
View Full Session -->
The Prime Minister is allegedly not funding the military despite promises, and is instead focusing on giving away British territory, such as the Chagos islands, to Mauritius. This is happening while cancelling vital training for British soldiers. Why is the Prime Minister choosing to fund a $35 billion deal with Mauritius over training the troops?
Context
The questioner references the Prime Minister's alleged failure to fund the military despite promises, and criticises the government's policy on the Chagos islands.
Andy Burnham
The right hon. Lady is not on strong ground with defence spending. It was 2.5% of GDP when the last Labour Government left office, and now it is set to be 2.7% in the next year. The Government is strong on the defence of this country and has set out a fully funded defence investment plan. The Government is committed to respecting the rights of the Falkland Islanders and will not surrender the Chagos islands.
Assessment
The answer does not directly address the specific funding priorities mentioned by the questioner.
Under Review
Working On This
Session: PMQs 2026-09-09
View Full Session -->
It is unbelievable that the Prime Minister would say that. He is clearly unwilling. We need to fund our defence, not spend all our money on welfare. I cannot believe that he would actually say that. He is clearly unwilling, but there are ways to do this—he is not unable. On Monday, Chris Rokos, Britain's third biggest taxpayer, announced that he was leaving the country. That is £330 million of taxes walking out the door because of this Labour Government—every year, £330 million. His taxes could be going on defence. The Prime Minister is talking about spending more on welfare. The benefits bill is set to rise by £32 billion under him—that is not all of it; that is the rise. That money could be going on defence. The Prime Minister will not approve the Rosebank oilfield—£1.4 billion of tax revenue that could be going on defence. So, will the Prime Minister tell the country: where is he going to find the money to fund our defence?
Context
Chris Rokos, a major taxpayer, has announced his departure from the UK, potentially losing £330 million in tax revenue annually. Kemi Badenoch questions how the Prime Minister plans to fund defence in light of this loss and the rise in the benefits bill.
Andy Burnham
I cannot comment today on quasi-judicial decisions, but we will take a pragmatic approach to oil and gas, as I have said before at the Dispatch Box. Let us get to the heart of this question, as the right hon. Lady invites me to do. What is the right way to fund defence and, yes, bring the welfare budget down? She would make crude cuts to housing benefit. As I have said, if £4 billion is taken out in the next few years, families will be made homeless and rough sleeping on our streets will increase. So here is the Labour way—the way that we do it on this side of the House. We have set out plans for the biggest council house building programme this country has seen in a generation. If the right hon. Lady looks at research from the National Housing Federation, she will see that that is the route to save billions from housing benefit.
Assessment
Did not specify where the money for defence would come from
Changed The Subject To Welfare Spending
Session: PMQs 2026-09-09
View Full Session -->
The Prime Minister wants to talk about the past on defence spending, so let me refresh his memory and that of the House. I remember when he was the shadow Home Secretary, when the then Labour leader wanted us to leave NATO, disarm our nuclear deterrent and defund the Army, so I will not be taking any lectures from him. The Prime Minister says the target is 2035. That is a decade away. If he cannot get to 3% by 2030, why should we believe he will get to 3.5% by 2035? The spending review is next year. Last week, I set out how we would get to 3% by 2030. The threats are now. Argentina is threatening the Falklands—now. Russia is threatening us in the North sea—now. The Prime Minister did not answer my question. I asked him if the Chancellor was right to quit. The Chancellor was right to quit, which is why it is so wrong that he is not sticking to his principles. The Chancellor used to say that not hitting 3% by 2030 would put our troops at risk. He also said that Keir Starmer was “unable”, and the Treasury “unwilling”, to provide that funding. So is the Prime Minister unable, or is he just unwilling, to get that money by 2030?
Context
The Prime Minister's previous stance on defence spending and the current target of 3.5% by 2035 are criticized. Kemi Badenoch questions the timeline and commitment to the 3% target by 2030.
Andy Burnham
This Chancellor, of all Chancellors, will be willing to provide that funding to our armed forces and back our defence investment plan. This Government's commitment to the defence of this country is absolute. We have taken the strongest possible stance in supporting President Zelensky and Ukraine. We are playing our role around the world, and we will continue to do so.
Assessment
Did not address whether the Prime Minister is unable or unwilling to get to 3% by 2030
Changed The Subject To Current Defence Actions
Session: PMQs 2026-09-09
View Full Session -->
After last week's session, the country was thrown into confusion over whether the Prime Minister was or was not going to fund 3% for defence by 2030. After today he will have another five weeks off PMQs, but there are some serious threats to national security that cannot wait. His Chancellor resigned as Defence Secretary because the Labour Government would not increase defence spending to 3% by 2030. Does the Prime Minister think that he was right to quit?
Context
The Chancellor resigned as Defence Secretary due to Labour's previous decision not to increase defence spending to 3% by 2030. Kemi Badenoch questions the Prime Minister's commitment to this goal and criticizes his past actions as shadow Home Secretary.
Andy Burnham
As I said last week, I appointed this Chancellor because of his strong commitment to the defence of this nation—that was the reason—and we will honour our NATO commitments: 3.5% by 2035, and a target date for 3%. That will all be set out in the spending review. I do not feel, though, that the right hon. Lady gets the right to come to this House and claim the moral high ground and point fingers wherever possible, when defence spending was 2.3% of GDP and fell during 14 years of a Conservative Government.
Assessment
Did not directly address whether the Chancellor was right to quit
Changed The Subject To Past Defence Spending
Session: PMQs 2026-09-09
View Full Session -->
The armed forces will not know what they will be getting until next July's spending review. Will the Prime Minister ditch the vibes and get serious about defending our nation?
Context
Concerns over the delay in announcing defence spending plans and the impact of high borrowing costs on the nation's defence.
Andy Burnham
The Chancellor is committed to the defence of the country and will fully fund the defence investment plan. The spending review will set out a plan to meet NATO commitments by 2035.
Assessment
Did not address the specific question about ditching the vibes and getting serious
Attacking The Opposition
Reiterating Commitment To Defence
Session: PMQs 2026-09-02
View Full Session -->
The Prime Minister did not rule out tax rises or more borrowing. Will he rule out any more borrowing that will make people poorer?
Context
Concerns over the rising cost of borrowing and its impact on families and businesses, following the new government's spending announcements.
Andy Burnham
The government will stick to fiscal responsibility, reduce cost of living pressure, and fully fund the defence investment plan. The country was not heading in the right direction under the previous government, but now it is.
Assessment
Did not rule out tax rises or increased borrowing
Attacking The Opposition
Reiterating Commitment To Fiscal Responsibility
Session: PMQs 2026-09-02
View Full Session -->
The markets are worried about increased borrowing costs and higher mortgage rates due to lack of funding for new spending. Will the Prime Minister rule out raising taxes or increasing borrowing to fund new promises?
Context
The question arises from concerns over the UK's rising debt and increased borrowing costs, following the new government's spending announcements.
Andy Burnham
Debt was rising under the previous government, and the current government is committed to fiscal responsibility, sticking to fiscal rules and reducing cost of living pressure. The approach will be to help constituents and not increase borrowing costs.
Assessment
Did not rule out tax rises or increased borrowing
Attacking The Opposition
Reiterating Commitment To Fiscal Responsibility
Session: PMQs 2026-09-02
View Full Session -->
I asked what the Prime Minister cut. He mentioned tax cuts but did not specify where the money came from. The Chief Secretary to the former Prime Minister, Darren Jones, said that there was no money allocated to digital ID. How does the Prime Minister plan to address the government's rising debt costs?
Context
The Prime Minister mentioned reallocating funding previously allocated to digital ID but the Chief Secretary to the former Prime Minister stated that there was no money allocated to digital ID.
Andy Burnham
I have worked with Jim O'Neill for 10 years and respect his advice. However, I argue that the previous government led to stagnant growth and rising debt. We have the fastest growth in the G7 and are cutting the deficit faster than any other G7 country. Borrowing has fallen to its lowest level in six years, and we are turning the corner on the economic situation.
Assessment
Explanation of funding sources for tax cuts
Acknowledging Lord O'Neill'S Advice
Comparing With Previous Government'S Performance
Highlighting Current Economic Growth And Deficit Reduction
Session: PMQs 2026-09-02
View Full Session -->
Yesterday, Lord O'Neill stated that the government's summer of promises was not what investors wanted to hear. This has led to the cost of government borrowing rising to its highest in 18 years. How does the Prime Minister plan to address this issue?
Context
Lord O'Neill, a close friend of the Prime Minister, stated that the government's summer of promises was not what investors wanted to hear. This has led to the cost of government borrowing rising to its highest in 18 years.
Andy Burnham
I have worked with Jim O'Neill for 10 years and respect his advice. However, I argue that the previous government led to stagnant growth and rising debt. We have the fastest growth in the G7 and are cutting the deficit faster than any other G7 country. Borrowing has fallen to its lowest level in six years, and we are turning the corner on the economic situation.
Assessment
Specific plan to tackle borrowing costs
Acknowledging Lord O'Neill'S Advice
Comparing With Previous Government'S Performance
Highlighting Current Economic Growth And Deficit Reduction
Session: PMQs 2026-09-02
View Full Session -->
The Prime Minister avoided answering my question yesterday. Can he name a single spending request to which he said no? He is talking about working together on welfare but did not specify any cuts. How does he plan to reduce the welfare bill?
Context
The Prime Minister faced 125 questions from MPs the previous day, with Labour and Lib Dems focusing on additional government spending. There is a perception that the Prime Minister has not denied any spending requests.
Andy Burnham
I am clear on the need to reduce the welfare bill and invest in young people's success. I have not denied any spending requests, but I have prioritised areas like VAT cuts for electricity bills and business rates cuts for certain venues. We are lowering the cost of living and business without cuts, fully funded through reprioritisation.
Assessment
Specific spending requests denial
Acknowledging The Need To Reduce Welfare Bill
Mentioning Vat And Business Rates Cuts But Not Denying Specific Requests
Emphasising Reprioritisation Without Cuts
Session: PMQs 2026-09-02
View Full Session -->
The Prime Minister may not think so now, but it is a tribute to him that not a single sitting Labour MP could beat him. Not the right hon. Member for Ashton-under-Lyne (Angela Rayner) who could not count her taxes, not the right hon. Member for Sheffield Heeley (Louise Haigh) who could not count how many phones she had lost—“lost, lost, lost”—and definitely not the right hon. Member for Ilford North (Wes Streeting) who could not count to 81. This is my last exchange with the right hon. and learned Gentleman. I know how much his wife and children mean to him, and that they are in the Gallery. As everyone here knows, our families make a huge sacrifice for our choice to enter public life. I hope that he will allow me to draw our time together to a close by thanking them for the love and support they have given him throughout his time in office.
Keir Starmer
I thank the right hon. Lady very much for that. This is the last question I will face from the Leader of the Opposition, so let me wish her and her family well. We have had robust exchanges across this Dispatch Box, but she has extended kindness to me privately at very difficult times, including when there was an attempt to burn down our family home, which deeply affected my family. She reached out to me then, and when my brother died of cancer she reached out to me privately, not across this Dispatch Box. I thank her for that and for the tribute that she just made to my wife and children, who mean the world to me.
Session: PMQs 2026-07-15
View Full Session -->
We also pulled the lever on the individual cases that matter, including those of individuals such as Carla—she is in the Gallery—who is one of the parents who came to see me about online harm and what that can do to our young children. That is why we banned social media for under-16s. Daniel, who is also here with his son, has spoken to me many times about the struggles that he has had with the cost of living and the need for a safe and secure home for every family and every child to grow up in. They are the people who matter more to me than anything else, because it is their lives that I think about when we make decisions in this Government.
Context
The MP asked about the Prime Minister's view on tackling specific issues such as online harm and housing costs, referencing individuals who have spoken to him.
Keir Starmer
We also pulled the lever on the individual cases that matter, including those of individuals such as Carla—she is in the Gallery—who is one of the parents who came to see me about online harm and what that can do to our young children. That is why we banned social media for under-16s. Daniel, who is also here with his son, has spoken to me many times about the struggles that he has had with the cost of living and the need for a safe and secure home for every family and every child to grow up in.
Session: PMQs 2026-07-15
View Full Session -->
That is a lovely statement that the Prime Minister has just made to Pooja; I am sure that the whole House will agree. I think that the whole House will also agree that he gave a very diplomatic answer to the question I asked on advice to his successor. Having heard that answer, I say this to Labour MPs with as much goodwill as I can muster—[Laughter.]—we have been where you are. Changing Prime Minister is not a silver bullet; indeed, it may be that the Labour party's troubles are only just beginning. Solving the fundamental problems in this country will require difficult decisions, and you also need to know how to get things done. The Prime Minister once said that when he pulled the levers, nothing happened. Why did he think that was?
Context
The MP referenced a previous comment by the Prime Minister about not being able to get things done when in power, questioning his ability to influence outcomes.
Keir Starmer
We did pull the levers. We pulled the levers to stabilise the economy, and we have done that. We pulled the levers to strengthen our public services and NHS waiting lists are coming down at the fastest rate for 17 years. We have pulled a big lever on child poverty, and this Government are doing more on child poverty than any Government ever, including previous Labour Governments.
Assessment
The specific ask about pulling levers was not addressed; instead, he highlighted government achievements.
Changed Subject
Session: PMQs 2026-07-15
View Full Session -->
I thank the Prime Minister for that answer and for paying tribute to so many of the people he has been able to help. In fact, I remember when I started this job, the Prime Minister was very helpful to me, saying that I would not last the year. Life comes at you fast. [Laughter.] He spent a long time laughing at how I had lost control of my party; I think he should have been paying attention to his Back Benchers instead of mine. Everyone in politics would do well to remember how quickly political fortunes can change. I know that the Prime Minister has been asked and that he is being diplomatic, but on that note, does he have any advice for his successor?
Context
The MP referenced a previous comment by the Prime Minister about her not lasting as leader, indicating rapid changes in political fortunes. She asked for specific advice on how his successor should approach their role.
Keir Starmer
I will give my wholehearted support to my successor. I want this Labour Government to be a success. I want our country to be a success. I shall give my support privately if asked for, not publicly when not asked for.
Assessment
The specific ask about advice was partially answered with vague commitments rather than concrete guidance.
Vague Commitment
Session: PMQs 2026-07-15
View Full Session -->
I know how much the Prime Minister has come to enjoy our exchanges—in fact, in the King's Speech debate he told me that on difficult days my input was “always a ray of sunshine.”—[Official Report, 13 May 2026; Vol. 786, c. 24.] He might not have answered many of the questions I asked him, but at least he turned up. It is important to respect Parliament, so does the Prime Minister agree that his successor should come to this place and answer questions rather than scurrying away for the summer?
Context
The MP noted the Prime Minister's absence from Parliament during the summer, raising concerns about transparency and accountability. She referenced a previous comment by the Prime Minister that on difficult days her input was always a ray of sunshine.
Keir Starmer
As Prime Minister, I have participated in over 60 sessions of PMQs—always a pleasure and always something to look forward to—and I have answered, or at least given answers, 2,800 times. [Laughter.] I am sure that the Leader of the Opposition will question my successor in the same way.
Assessment
The specific ask about his successor coming to Parliament was not addressed; instead, he spoke generally about his own record of answering questions.
Changed Subject
Personal Praise
Session: PMQs 2026-07-15
View Full Session -->
Can I start by thanking the Prime Minister for the way that he responded to the murder of Ann Widdecombe last week? This is the first opportunity I have had on the Floor of the House to commemorate her life. A lot has been said about how she died. I want to focus on celebrating the life she lived. Ann was a woman of high principle and profound beliefs, with a wicked sense of humour—a wonderful combination of being a serious person who did not take herself too seriously. She changed her faith from Anglican to Catholic and from the Conservative party to the Brexit party, but she always remained part of the Conservative family. You might not always have agreed with her, but Ann Widdecombe was a woman who said what she meant and meant what she said. Her honesty made our politics better.
Context
The question is prompted by the recent passing of Ann Widdecombe, a notable Conservative politician. The MP pays tribute to her before asking about continued cross-party support for Ukraine.
Keir Starmer
I join the right hon. Lady in her tribute to Ann Widdecombe. I know that the hurt is keenly felt across all her friends and family, but it is particularly keenly felt by political colleagues in the Conservative party—her party for many years—and in Reform as well. That is why one of the first things I did on Friday was to phone the Leader of the Opposition and the leader and deputy leader of Reform to express my condolences and act in a cross-party manner, because I knew how much this would hurt them and many people in their parties.
Assessment
The PM did not explicitly agree on cross-party support for Ukraine's cause but instead focused on the tribute to Ann Widdecombe.
Focused On Tributes
Did Not Address Cross-Party Support
Session: PMQs 2026-07-15
View Full Session -->
Labour Members are laughing and pretending, but if he was doing such a fabulous job, why did he resign? Defence of the realm is the first duty of Government. Britain is facing a moment of danger unlike anything in our lifetimes and unlike anything that we saw in government. We need a plan to fund our armed forces that meets this moment.
Context
The Conservative MP criticises the current government's defence policy, claiming it is weak and inadequate.
Keir Starmer
It is just all talk. What did the Conservatives actually do? They cut defence, from 2.5% to 2.3%, in their 14 long years. And what did they do on welfare? They put the bill up by £88 billion, so we will take no lectures from them.
Session: PMQs 2026-07-01
View Full Session -->
There are only three ways to find the missing £5 billion: increase borrowing, raise taxes, or cut welfare. Which one will the Prime Minister recommend to the right hon. Member for Makerfield?
Context
The plan announced by the Prime Minister is currently short by £5 billion. There are three ways to find this money: increasing borrowing, raising taxes, or cutting welfare.
Keir Starmer
We are talking about £1 billion a year over four years. The decisions at the last Budget gave us more than £22 billion in headroom, so we can take the decisions the country needs.
Assessment
Did not specify which method would be used to find the £5 billion shortfall; instead focused on existing budget flexibility and credibility of taking decisions outside of the Budget.
Focus On Budget Flexibility
Session: PMQs 2026-07-01
View Full Session -->
The Prime Minister's plan has unravelled and it does not deliver until after 2030, when there could be an attack on NATO. The plan relies on £11 billion of unidentified savings and is currently short by £5 billion. Did the right hon. Member for Makerfield know that he was going to have to find £5 billion for this plan?
Context
The Prime Minister announced a £15 billion investment for defence outside the Budget, which is currently short by £5 billion. This announcement was made despite warnings that an attack on NATO could occur as early as 2030.
Keir Starmer
When I became Prime Minister two years ago, this country spent £54 billion a year on defence. Because of the decisions we have taken, that will rise to £80 billion a year by 2029. That is a real-terms increase of 27%, transforming our armed forces.
Assessment
Did not address whether Andy Burnham knew about the shortfall, instead discussing overall increases in defence spending over time.
Focus On Overall Increases
Session: PMQs 2026-07-01
View Full Session -->
The Chief of the Defence Staff noted that Britain's defence funding has not kept up with rising threats, with Poland increasing its funding to 4.8% and Germany to 3.7%. Russia is set to spend 10% of GDP on defence in 2023. The plan announced by the Prime Minister for defence spending lacks £5 billion. Can he confirm that the right hon. Member for Makerfield has agreed to fund this shortfall?
Context
The Chief of the Defence Staff noted that Britain's defence funding has not kept up with rising threats, with Poland increasing its funding to 4.8% and Germany to 3.7%. Russia is set to spend 10% of GDP on defence in 2023.
Keir Starmer
When I became Prime Minister two years ago, this country spent £54 billion a year on defence. Because of the decisions we have taken, that will rise to £80 billion a year by 2029. That is a real-terms increase of 27%, transforming our armed forces.
Assessment
Did not confirm if Andy Burnham has committed to the £5 billion shortfall, instead focusing on overall increases in defence spending over time.
Focus On Overall Increases
Session: PMQs 2026-07-01
View Full Session -->
The Prime Minister did not say it was enough, and that was a very long list of things he is not yet paying for. It is not right and fair to our troops who put their lives on the line every day. Since the Defence Secretary resigned, only 0.01% increase in spending has occurred. How can he stand there and say this is enough?
Context
The Defence Secretary resigned over forced decisions that increased risk to personnel. Spending has only increased by 0.01% since then.
Keir Starmer
This is the most significant upgrade in defence spending since the 1980s, funded by Labour to £300 billion and rising. It contrasts with Conservatives' record of cutting defence spending and missing recruitment targets.
Assessment
Addressing concerns about insufficient funding increase after Defence Secretary's resignation
Redirecting To Opposition'S Record
Contrasting With Previous Government
Session: PMQs 2026-07-01
View Full Session -->
Can I associate myself and those on the Opposition Benches with the Prime Minister's comments about Venezuela, and also about the Lib Dems? But seriously, the Chief of the Defence Staff made it known that the armed forces needed a minimum of £28 billion more to defend the country. Can the Prime Minister tell us why he thinks half that amount is enough?
Context
The Chief of the Defence Staff stated that the armed forces need a minimum of £28 billion more to defend the country.
Keir Starmer
This Labour Government have delivered two major funding increases in just two years, taking us to £300 billion over the next four years. This investment will strengthen our nuclear capability, upgrade naval bases and confirm commitment to fighter jets.
Session: PMQs 2026-07-01
View Full Session -->
The right hon. and learned Gentleman is the one who is resigning because of his MPs. The Prime Minister has made many mistakes but also been let down by an Energy Secretary who is killing industry, a Chancellor who is killing jobs, and Back-Benchers who do not understand that government is about tough choices.
Context
The Prime Minister is under pressure for his U-turns, which have led to issues with various policies.
Keir Starmer
Two years ago, I walked into No. 10 and found a broken economy, broken public services and broken trust in politics. Because of our decisions—the country is moving in the right direction: a stronger and fairer Britain.
Assessment
Mistakes made by the Prime Minister
Changing Subject To Labour'S Achievements
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
The right hon. and learned Gentleman is the one who is resigning because of his MPs. The Prime Minister has been let down by an Energy Secretary who is killing industry, let down by a Chancellor who is killing jobs, and let down by Back-Benchers who do not understand that government is about tough choices. He U-turned again and again to appease them.
Context
The Prime Minister is facing a significant loss of support from his own party members.
Keir Starmer
Thank you Mr Speaker. I was trying to do all this with as much good grace as I could, but I shall certainly miss these exchanges. We inflicted the biggest loss on the Tories in their history and turned it around.
Assessment
Feelings of betrayal by MPs
Changing Subject To Labour'S Victory
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
If it is all so fantastic, why is the Prime Minister resigning? It is very generous of him to stick by his Ministers, because they did not stick by him. He can say what he likes, but the people of Aberdeen gave their verdict—they voted Conservative against the Energy Secretary. Some Cabinet members are loyal and incompetent, as shown by a poll where 0% of teachers think that the Education Secretary is doing a good job.
Context
The Prime Minister is facing pressure to resign due to multiple issues including the performance of his ministers.
Keir Starmer
The Education Secretary grew up in poverty and knows exactly what it means. She was once reluctant to tell her story, but I know it is an incredible story of social mobility and success. She knows that education is vital for poor children, which drives every single priority and value she has.
Assessment
The Prime Minister's resignation and incompetence
Changing The Subject To Praise The Education Secretary
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Labour Members are cheering so loudly, but if it is all going so fine, why is the Prime Minister resigning? The fact is the Chancellor did let him down. She is the one who snatched the winter fuel payment and who announced a disastrous Budget that killed economic growth. Because of her, a Labour Prime Minister is once again leaving office with unemployment higher than when he came in.
Context
The MP questioned the Prime Minister's resignation, criticizing his Chancellor for economic mismanagement. She mentioned the rise in unemployment under a Labour PM.
Keir Starmer
The Chancellor and I picked up our party six years ago from the worst defeat since 1935. We turned the party around and made it face the country, and we won a landslide general election, giving the Conservatives the biggest drubbing in their history.
Assessment
Did not address why the Prime Minister is resigning or economic impact
Focused On Party Achievements
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
I think the Prime Minister forgot to mention that we got 50% of the vote in Aberdeen South. He says that he is funding defence; the truth is he would not be in this mess if his Chancellor had found money for the defence investment plan. The Prime Minister gave her the second most important job in Britain. She was the first female Chancellor. She lives next door to him, but would not even come out to stand by him during his resignation speech; she was too busy getting ready for a selfie with the new leader. Does the Prime Minister feel let down by his Chancellor?
Context
The MP challenged the Prime Minister's claim about funding defence. She mentioned the high vote share in a recent by-election as evidence of the government's poor handling.
Keir Starmer
This is the Chancellor who ended the austerity inflicted on our country for 14 long years. This is the Chancellor who got the economy growing. The Leader of the Opposition does not normally want to talk about the economy. That is because in the first quarter of this year, the UK had the fastest growing economy in the G7.
Assessment
Did not address whether he feels let down by his Chancellor or funding issues
Focused On Economic Performance
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
I associate the Opposition with the Prime Minister's remarks on the horrific train crash, the attacks in Edinburgh and, of course, Armed Forces Week. I want to start by congratulating the Prime Minister: he is the other party leader who won a by-election last week, although I think I am much happier with my new MP than he is with his. Two weeks ago, the Prime Minister told the House that the Government were funding defence and that everything was under control. The very next day, the Defence Secretary resigned, saying the Prime Minister was “unable” and the Treasury “unwilling” to fund the defence of our country. What changed?
Context
The MP noted the resignation of the Defence Secretary, stating that the Prime Minister was unable to fund defence properly. She questioned what changed.
Keir Starmer
The right hon. Lady references the by-election—I am very pleased with our new Member of Parliament. In Gorton and Denton, the Tories got 1.9% of the vote. I congratulate her because they got 2.2% of the vote in Makerfield, just edging past Count Binface. She says that they are winning everywhere. At that rate, it will take them 500 years to get back into power. Meanwhile, back on the Government Benches, we have delivered the biggest sustained boost to defence spending since the 1980s—£270 billion over this Parliament.
Assessment
Did not address why the Defence Secretary resigned or what changed about funding
Focused On By-Election Results
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
As the Prime Minister is weak and unable to face down Back Benchers or cut benefits, will he be remembered for a bloated welfare state and weaker armed forces?
Context
The government is criticized for its inability to make tough decisions regarding defence and welfare spending, especially as the leader's premiership draws to a close.
Keir Starmer
The Conservatives neither reformed welfare nor invested in our armed forces when they were in office. Defence spending went down, and welfare spending went up by £88 billion overall, with £33 billion under the shadow Chancellor.
Assessment
The specific ask about weakness was completely avoided; instead, the response criticized past governance.
Changing Subject To Past Failures
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
At a time of increased global tension with war in Europe and the Middle East, why does the Prime Minister not have a defence investment plan? Why not just cut welfare benefits?
Context
The government is facing criticism for lacking a clear plan to balance defence and welfare spending, especially in light of increased global instability.
Keir Starmer
The right hon. Lady ignores our leadership on Ukraine and military coalitions, as well as the fact that we are turning the country around with growth up, interest rates down, immigration down, and NHS waiting lists coming down at a rate not seen in 17 years.
Assessment
The specific ask about cutting welfare was completely avoided; instead, the response focused on unrelated achievements.
Changing Subject To Unrelated Achievements
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
There is still no defence investment plan. The military is waiting, and bond markets are watching. The Prime Minister has only three options: cutting spending, more borrowing, or higher taxes. Will he rule out raising taxes?
Context
The government has not provided a clear defence investment plan despite previous statements and concerns from the military.
Keir Starmer
The right hon. Lady asks the House to ignore the last 14 years of Conservative governance, but we cannot forget that when they left office, 47 out of 49 major defence contracts were delayed or over budget. We are fixing this and increasing defence spending. The defence investment plan will be published before the NATO summit in a few weeks.
Assessment
The specific ask about ruling out tax rises was not directly addressed; instead, the response focused on past governance issues.
Ignore The Last 14 Years
Focusing On Past Failures
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
I welcome the pay rise for the armed forces. The Prime Minister says he has increased defence spending, but he has not. This year he is cutting it by £3.5 billion. What he is talking about are hopeful increases, and we do not know if he will make them because there is still no defence investment plan. At a time when we need leadership, we have total paralysis. It is reported that the Chancellor is only willing to find £13 billion for the DIP. How can that be the case when he is giving the armed forces less than half of the minimum that they need?
Context
The Prime Minister has not yet published the full defence investment plan, raising concerns about meeting the minimum defence spending requirement. The Chancellor reportedly only offers £13 billion for this plan.
Keir Starmer
We have already increased defence spending to £270 billion over this Parliament. We took defence spending from 2.5% to 2.3%. Now we are at 2.6% by 2027. The plan will be published before the NATO summit, and we signed 1,400 major contracts, with 94% going to British businesses.
Assessment
Did not address how current spending meets minimum requirements or discuss the £13 billion reported by the Chancellor for DIP.
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
We have wasted two years waiting for the defence investment plan. Projects have been put on hold and Britain is getting weaker with every passing day. It has been reported that the Chief of the Defence Staff told the Prime Minister that the Ministry of Defence needs an extra £28 billion. Will that requirement be met in full?
Context
It has been reported that the Chief of the Defence Staff told the Prime Minister that the Ministry of Defence needs an extra £28 billion. There are concerns about delays in publishing the defence investment plan.
Keir Starmer
We will set out the defence investment plan, a 10-year review of defence budgets. The right hon. Lady is wrong to say it has been delayed by two years; the strategic review was published last year and we have been working through details. We increased defence spending from 2.3% to 2.6%. Spending in this Parliament totals £270 billion, with 1,400 major contracts signed.
Assessment
Did not confirm whether the additional £28 billion requirement will be met in full, only discussed general spending and contract details.
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
I wish England and Scotland the very best in the world cup. I wish you a very happy birthday, Mr Speaker—many happy returns. May I take the opportunity to associate myself with the remarks that the Prime Minister made about the helicopter crash? Our condolences go to their families, and to the family of Michael Storey. The scenes in Belfast are deeply disturbing. A man is in hospital after a brutal attack and now families are frightened after a night of violence. Last night, America carried out strikes on Iran in response to the downing of a US helicopter. This comes just days after renewed attacks on Ukraine. The world is getting more dangerous and the British public want to know that this Government are doing everything they can to protect our national security. Can the Prime Minister tell the House, will the full defence investment plan finally be published this week?
Context
The UK faces a more volatile world with renewed attacks on Ukraine and strikes in Iran, raising concerns about national security. The government has not yet published the full defence investment plan.
Keir Starmer
I agree with the Leader of the Opposition that in relation to both Iran and Ukraine, we are facing a more volatile world than at any time during our lifetimes. We have already taken measures such as increasing defence spending from 2.3% to 2.6% by 2027 and carrying out a strategic review of defence. The defence investment plan will be published before the NATO summit in just a few weeks' time.
Assessment
Did not confirm whether the full defence investment plan will be published this week, only stated it will be published before the NATO summit.
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
The Prime Minister lacks the votes for reform due to opposition within his party. There is no genuine solution, as benefits increase while taxes and employment rates decline. The real issue is that Labour will always seek ways to tax more to fund benefits.
Context
Unemployment has risen monthly since the new government took office. The Prime Minister's inability to reform welfare is attributed to a lack of support from his MPs, suggesting he may not be in power long-term.
Keir Starmer
For 14 years, Conservatives broke our welfare system, lost control over borders and economy. Our Labour Government is delivering change: workers' rights upgraded, Renters' Rights Act passed, NHS funding increased, fastest G7 growth recorded, half a million children lifted out of poverty.
Assessment
Prime Minister's authority issues or party DNA problems
Changed Subject To Labour Achievements
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Tony Blair suggested Labour should consider working with Conservatives on welfare reforms. I repeat this offer now: will the Prime Minister be ready to cooperate?
Context
The Prime Minister's inability to reform welfare is seen as a loss of authority among his MPs. The Welfare Secretary privately mentioned the focus on finding new taxes rather than cutting benefits, highlighting internal conflicts.
Keir Starmer
The system they introduced is broken, and we do not need their advice on welfare. Our focus should be on helping people change their lives rather than what benefits are entitled. We have delivered more rights for renters, workers, and lifted half a million children out of poverty.
Assessment
Cooperation with Conservatives on welfare reforms
Changed Subject To Labour'S Achievements
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
None of the proposed welfare reforms will cut the bill. Despite the opportunity to implement changes, the Government U-turned last year and abandoned plans to reduce benefits due to internal pressure from MPs. Does the Prime Minister acknowledge losing authority over his party because they oppose benefit reductions?
Context
The Prime Minister's repeated claims of welfare reform have not addressed the rising bill. The Timms review, commissioned by the government, stated that proposals should not be about generating further savings.
Keir Starmer
I am proud of our delivery: fastest G7 economy growth, net migration down by 82%, asylum backlog reduced by 46%, NHS waiting times improved faster than ever before, free school meals and childcare expanded, half a million children lifted out of poverty.
Assessment
The Prime Minister's loss of authority over welfare reform proposals
Changed Subject To Economic Achievements
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
We must bring down the benefits bill. The Prime Minister criticises the shadow Chancellor but the increase was due to pandemic spending. Is he going to cut the benefits bill?
Context
There is a need to address the rising welfare bill.
Keir Starmer
Our reforms include introducing a youth guarantee, offering support for six months if unemployed after 18 months. The Conservatives introduced a broken system which we are now reforming.
Assessment
The specific ask about cutting the benefits bill was not directly addressed; instead, general measures were mentioned without specifics on reducing costs.
Our Reforms Include
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
We need to reduce the welfare bill. The Prime Minister complains about the shadow Chancellor, but the bill rose due to pandemic spending even then. Why is there no welfare reform Bill? Is he going to cut the benefits bill?
Context
The benefits bill has increased significantly.
Keir Starmer
Our measures include balancing universal credit, introducing a right to try incentive, and providing record funding on apprenticeships. The previous Government saw welfare spending soar by £88 billion.
Assessment
The specific ask for cutting the benefits bill was not directly addressed; instead, general measures were mentioned without specifics on reducing costs.
Our Measures Include
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
I express condolences regarding recent tragic events. The welfare bill has risen by £20 billion since this Government took office. Why was there no welfare reform Bill in the King's Speech?
Context
The benefits bill has risen since the current government came to office.
Keir Starmer
We are improving the broken system inherited from the Conservatives: delivering a youth guarantee, rolling out work experience placements, and commissioning a review into youth unemployment. The bill increased by £88 billion under the previous Government.
Assessment
The specific ask about the absence of welfare reform Bill was not directly addressed; instead, general measures were mentioned without specifics on the King's Speech.
We Are Improving
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
I think the whole country is sick of this man's tone-deaf, pompous moralising. Since the last King's Speech, it has been one disaster after another: cronyism, jobs for friends of convicted paedophiles, peerages for other friends of convicted paedophiles, broken promises on taxes, and U-turn after U-turn after U-turn. How much longer do we all have to put up with his shambles?
Context
The Prime Minister has lost significant support within his party and government due to a series of policy failures.
Keir Starmer
I changed my party and I won a general election. She has changed her party, because when I became leader of mine, the Conservative party was three times the size it is now. The stunt the Conservatives played yesterday was because they do not like what we are delivering: more rights at work, more security for renters, and half a million children lifted out of poverty.
Assessment
Addressed criticism of the Prime Minister's leadership by discussing Labour's achievements instead
Changed Subject To Labour'S Successes
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
I did not hear the Prime Minister say that he is not reshuffling the Chancellor; it sounds like she's toast. The Prime Minister's own people have turned against him, and all the while, he is holed up in his castle. Isn't the real reason the Prime Minister cannot cut welfare that he has squandered all his political capital saving his own skin?
Context
The Prime Minister is facing criticism for losing political support and credibility. Labour MPs have commented on the Prime Minister's days being numbered.
Keir Starmer
The Leader of the Opposition talks about playing political games. This House considered her motion, and rejected it decisively because everyone saw it for what it was: a desperate, baseless political stunt ahead of the May elections. While she and the Opposition were playing games here, I was chairing a Cobra meeting, going through the contingencies and managing that war in the middle east.
Assessment
Addressed the question about welfare cuts indirectly by discussing political stunts instead of addressing the substantive issue of why welfare cannot be cut
Changed Subject To Political Stunts
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Talking about more defence spending is not the same as giving more money for defence. The Prime Minister has been in office for nearly two years with no defence investment plan, and we have gone backwards on defence because welfare costs are increasing. The cost of government borrowing is at its highest in two decades; that is under him. Will he listen to businesses and the country and reshuffle the Chancellor?
Context
The Prime Minister has been in office for nearly two years without producing a defence investment plan. The cost of government borrowing is at its highest in two decades.
Keir Starmer
At the spring statement, the Chancellor was very proud to say that inflation was down to 3% and falling; interest rates have been cut six times; we have seen growth figures for the early part of this year. When I said we would not be dragged into war in Iran because I had thought through the consequences, including economic ones, what did she want? She wanted us to jump in with both feet without regard.
Assessment
specific ask about reshuffling the Chancellor
Changing Subject To Discuss Iran War Implications
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Let me tell the Prime Minister why we are spending more on welfare than we earn in tax: it is because of him and his terrible policies—this is all under him. We cannot defend Britain with an ever-expanding welfare budget. Why doesn't the Prime Minister agree?
Context
The former Labour Defence Secretary, Lord Robertson, stated that we cannot defend Britain with an ever-expanding welfare budget. The Prime Minister is accused of poor economic management leading to increased welfare costs.
Keir Starmer
This is the Labour Government who increased defence spending to its highest sustained spend since the cold war. When they came into power, defence spending was 2.5%; when they left power, it was 2.3%. Their Defence Secretary admitted that they 'hollowed out' our armed forces.
Assessment
specific ask about Lord Robertson's statement
Criticizing The Opposition For Managing Defence Budgets Poorly
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
The Prime Minister does not want to say how many more people are out of work and claiming universal credit since he took office; perhaps he does not know: it is 1.5 million people. Hard-working people are being taxed more to pay for a ballooning benefits bill. Why, on his watch, for the first time ever, are we spending more on welfare than we earn in income tax?
Context
The Prime Minister is unable to say how many more people are out of work and claiming Universal Credit since he took office; it is 1.5 million people, the entire population of Leeds, Cardiff, and Edinburgh combined.
Keir Starmer
The welfare system is one that the Conservatives put in place. We are reforming it to improve it; what did they do when we put that forward? They voted to keep the same broken welfare system.
Assessment
specific ask about why welfare expenditure exceeds income tax revenue
Criticizing Opposition For Opposing Reforms Without Addressing Specifics
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
It is the end of this Session and what a contrast with the beginning. Back in July 2024, the Government Benches were full adoring new MPs asking sycophantic questions; yesterday, the Prime Minister was reduced to begging those same MPs for support. The economy has not grown under the current government; the welfare bill is increasing instead. Can the Prime Minister tell us how many more people are out of work and claiming universal credit since he took office?
Context
In July 2024, the Government Benches were full of new MPs asking sycophantic questions; yesterday, the Prime Minister was reduced to begging those same MPs for support. The economy has not grown under the current government.
Keir Starmer
We have put in place the youth guarantee for young people; we have raised the national minimum wage, cut NHS waiting lists, put more police on the streets, and cut energy bills for young people. I am very proud of what this Labour Government has delivered in the first Session of this Parliament.
Assessment
specific ask about number of unemployed claiming Universal Credit
Putting Forward Broad Achievements Without Addressing Unemployment Statistics
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
The Prime Minister says that bills are coming down; they are higher than they were when he came into office. He talks about what the Government are doing to help with energy bills. Families and businesses will suffer from the spike in energy costs because of his decisions. He could abolish the green taxes on their bills. He could stop the fuel duty rise. We could drill our own gas in the North sea. What is he doing? He is planning another giveaway to people on welfare. Yet again, he is taking money from those who work to give it to those who do not.
Context
Families and businesses are facing a spike in energy costs due to the government's decisions. The opposition criticizes the government for planning another welfare giveaway while not addressing the rising bills.
Keir Starmer
The Conservatives are the ones who doubled the spend on welfare. They were the ones with a broken system. When we tried to mend it, what did they do? They voted against it.
Assessment
None of the specific asks were addressed
Attacking Conservative'S Policies
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Stopping all new drilling in the North sea was a reckless promise when he made it before the election; in the middle of a global energy crisis, it is catastrophic. Experts are predicting a £300 rise in bills in July. Approving new licences would show that he is serious about cutting bills. Why will he not do it?
Context
Experts predict a £300 rise in bills due to the government's decision against new drilling in the North Sea. The question arises from concerns about rising energy costs during a global crisis.
Keir Starmer
Because of the action that we have taken, household bills are coming down by around £100 next month, then they will be capped for three months. That is what we are doing to protect households across the country.
Assessment
The specific ask about approving new drilling licences was not addressed
Voting Against Welfare Protection
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Local authorities employ 2 million people and commission services such as adult social care. The impact assessment for the Secretary of State's Employment Rights Bill says that the Bill will increase costs. Those costs are likely to be passed on to councils, so has the Secretary of State assessed the impact of the Employment Rights Bill and an increase in employers' national insurance specifically on local authorities? If costs do increase, will local councils be compensated?
Context
The impact assessment for the Employment Rights Bill suggests that it will increase costs, which local authorities are likely to pass on. The question seeks clarity on whether these impacts have been assessed and if councils will be compensated.
Jim McMahon
Any decisions related to the Budget will be taken at the appropriate time, as will any decisions on the local government finance settlement. What I can say, though, is that this is a new partnership from this Government: we are not locking local government out, but standing shoulder to shoulder with it. Only last week at the Local Government Association conference in Harrogate, the Secretary of State launched the leaders' council, a forum where central and local government will reset that relationship.
Session: Local Authority Funding
View All Questions -->
At the last oral questions, the Secretary of State assured me that she had no plans to increase council tax for anyone. However, when pressed by my right hon. Friend the Member for Beverley and Holderness (Graham Stuart), she would not give the same guarantee that the single occupant discount would be retained. Will Ministers take the opportunity to do so now?
Context
The question arises from a previous assurance given by the Secretary of State that there would be no plans to increase council tax for anyone. However, when questioned specifically about retaining the single occupant discount, the response was less clear.
Jim McMahon
I can see the shadow Secretary of State making that point repeatedly, because at this stage we are all waiting for the statement and the Budget that will contain that information, but I can say that the right decisions will be made in the interests of working people. We recognise the cost of living crisis that is being faced across the country.
Session: Local Authority Funding
View All Questions -->
Does reducing the capacity of councils by 20% through flexible working provide good value for taxpayers or residents?
Context
The Conservative member questions whether reducing the capacity of councils by allowing workers an additional paid day off each week is acceptable or provides good value for money.
Angela Rayner
We advocate for flexible working, which is no threat to business or the economy. We do not dictate how councils run their services but work with them to ensure productivity.
Session: Topical Questions
View All Questions -->
Do the Government have plans to tackle rogue landlords on their own Benches?
Context
The Conservative member highlights revelations about a Labour Member who is letting out mouldy homes with infestation and owns an unsafe private care home where children have gone missing.
Alex Norris
As I understand it, the Member for Ilford South says there have been no conflicts of interest and that all interests have been declared in line with his council's rules.
Session: Topical Questions
View All Questions -->
The right hon. Lady has not read the Khan review, as she would not have given that answer if she had. The review talks about the 2021 incident at Batley grammar school where a teacher was failed by local police and the local council and had to go into hiding. Given the fears about the rise of Islamist sectarianism in communities such as West Yorkshire, what are the right hon. Lady's plans to ensure such incidents do not happen again?
Context
A 2021 incident at Batley grammar school involved a teacher in hiding due to local police and council failures. There are concerns about rising Islamist sectarianism.
Angela Rayner
I have read the review. The previous government stoked division rather than promoting cohesion. As shadow Education Secretary, I worked towards unity across education. If successful in her bid, the right hon. Lady should work with us to celebrate diversity and bring communities together.
Session: Community Cohesion
View All Questions -->
Can the right hon. Lady give me her assessment of the Khan review into social cohesion?
Context
The Khan review into social cohesion has been published, addressing community issues and the previous government's approach to divisiveness.
Angela Rayner
The Khan review is part of addressing community issues rather than the divisiveness seen under the previous government. The tone and language from Members on the right need to change to bring communities together, respecting differences and celebrating what makes Britain diverse.
Session: Community Cohesion
View All Questions -->
It has been reported that the Secretary of State is being lobbied to increase council tax and remove discounts such as the single occupancy discount. Will she take this opportunity to reassure the House that the Government have no plans to increase council tax, as they assured us before the election?
Context
The MP inquired about the government's plans regarding council tax increases and discounts.
Angela Rayner
Yes.
Session: Topical Questions
View All Questions -->
Other Parliamentary Activity
Debates led and petitions presented.
Conversion Therapy Practices In Britain
08 March 2021
Main Concerns
['The lead MP expressed concern about the continuation of conversion therapy practices in modern Britain, noting that 5% of respondents to a national LGBT survey had been offered conversion therapy and 2% had undergone it. She highlighted the significant mental health problems and isolation associated with these practices, which can also lead to homelessness and abuse.']
Specific Asks
['The MP requested further engagement on finding effective measures to combat abhorrent practices without pushing them underground, ensuring that any action taken is proportionate and effective in protecting LGBT individuals. She also expressed the need for a comprehensive approach involving legislative and non-legislative measures.']
Direction of Government
01 September 2026
Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate
G7 Summit
22 June 2026
Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate
Defence Investment Plan
15 June 2026
Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate
Debate on the Address
13 May 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges
28 April 2026
General Debate
Led by this MP
The motion calls for the matter of Peter Mandelson's appointment as US Ambassador to be referred to the Privileges Committee due to claims that the Prime Minister misled the House. Kemi Badenoch argue...
Peter Mandelson: Government Appointment
21 April 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
Middle East
13 April 2026
Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate
Middle East
02 March 2026
Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate
China and Japan 2026-02-02
02 February 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
The Prime Minister outlined the importance of engaging with both China and Japan to safeguard national interests. He discussed his recent visit, highlighting the strengthening of UK-US relations, rese...
Venezuela 2026-01-05
05 January 2026
Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate
Attendance
36.7%
36 of 98 votes
Aye Votes
17
17.3% of votes
No Votes
19
19.4% of votes
Abstentions
62
63.3% of votes
11 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Closure motion
Ayes: 293
Noes: 218
Passed
11 Sep 2026
VOTED NO
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill: Second Reading
Ayes: 270
Noes: 286
Failed
10 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Social Housing Bill [Lords]: Reasoned Amendment to Second Reading
Ayes: 77
Noes: 292
Failed
09 Sep 2026
VOTED NO
Draft Plant Health, Seeds, Seed Potatoes and Plant Propagating Material (Ame...
Ayes: 371
Noes: 100
Passed
08 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Health Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 140
Ayes: 79
Noes: 300
Failed
08 Sep 2026
VOTED AYE
Health Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 142
Ayes: 108
Noes: 357
Failed
08 Sep 2026
VOTED AYE
Health Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 143
Ayes: 106
Noes: 302
Failed
08 Sep 2026
VOTED AYE
Health Bill: Report Stage: Amendment 1
Ayes: 162
Noes: 297
Failed
07 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Health Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 6
Ayes: 77
Noes: 317
Failed
07 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Health Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 145
Ayes: 170
Noes: 316
Failed
04 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Motion to sit in private
Ayes: 1
Noes: 79
Failed
02 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Representation of the People Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 65
Ayes: 166
Noes: 346
Failed
02 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Representation of the People Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 67
Ayes: 105
Noes: 410
Failed
02 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Representation of the People Bill: Report Stage: New Clause 88
Ayes: 85
Noes: 427
Failed
02 Sep 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Representation of the People Bill: Third Reading
Ayes: 411
Noes: 102
Passed
01 Jul 2026
VOTED NO
Employment Tribunal (Extension of Time Limits) (Miscellaneous Amendments and...
Ayes: 322
Noes: 107
Passed
01 Jul 2026
VOTED NO
Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) (Amendment...
Ayes: 318
Noes: 107
Passed
01 Jul 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 2
Ayes: 80
Noes: 281
Failed
01 Jul 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 4
Ayes: 173
Noes: 282
Failed
01 Jul 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 5
Ayes: 177
Noes: 308
Failed
24 Jun 2026
VOTED NO
Customs (Tariff and Miscellaneous Amendments) (No. 4) Regulations 2026
Ayes: 323
Noes: 160
Passed
24 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Draft Carbon Budget Order 2026
Ayes: 332
Noes: 94
Passed
24 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Draft Climate Change Act 2008 (International Aviation and International Shipp...
Ayes: 329
Noes: 94
Passed
24 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Draft Climate Change Act 2008 (Credit Limit) Order 2026
Ayes: 330
Noes: 93
Passed
23 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Opposition day: Defence spending and readiness
Ayes: 108
Noes: 307
Failed
23 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Opposition Day Motion: Defence spending and readiness - Prime Minister's Amen...
Ayes: 294
Noes: 110
Passed
23 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Opposition Day: Puberty blockers
Ayes: 112
Noes: 283
Failed
22 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: New Clause 4
Ayes: 164
Noes: 311
Failed
22 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: New Clause 11
Ayes: 104
Noes: 391
Failed
22 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: New Clause 22
Ayes: 74
Noes: 323
Failed
22 Jun 2026
VOTED AYE
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: Amendment 11
Ayes: 171
Noes: 322
Failed
17 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
National Security (State Threats) Bill: Allocation of Time motion
Ayes: 233
Noes: 94
Passed
17 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: Amendment 3
Ayes: 85
Noes: 317
Failed
17 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: Amendment 8
Ayes: 143
Noes: 249
Failed
17 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: Amendment 13
Ayes: 135
Noes: 258
Failed
17 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: New Clause 3
Ayes: 144
Noes: 244
Failed
16 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remainin...
Ayes: 77
Noes: 255
Failed
16 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remainin...
Ayes: 151
Noes: 258
Failed
16 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remainin...
Ayes: 162
Noes: 246
Failed
16 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Draft Clean Air Zones Central Services (Fees) (England) (Amendment) Regulatio...
Ayes: 262
Noes: 86
Passed
24 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Opposition Day: Protections for children from online harms
Ayes: 69
Noes: 279
Failed
23 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill Committee: Amendment 1
Ayes: 161
Noes: 272
Failed
23 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill Committee: New Clause 2
Ayes: 156
Noes: 273
Failed
23 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill Committee: New Clause 3
Ayes: 77
Noes: 280
Failed
23 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill Committee: New Clause 3
Ayes: 73
Noes: 256
Failed
23 Feb 2026
VOTED NO
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill: Third Reading
Ayes: 361
Noes: 84
Passed
11 Feb 2026
VOTED NO
Draft Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) (Extension to Marit...
Ayes: 362
Noes: 107
Passed
11 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Local Government Finance Report (England) 2026-27
Ayes: 277
Noes: 143
Passed
11 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Referendums Relating to Council Tax Increases (Principles) (England) Report 2...
Ayes: 279
Noes: 90
Passed
04 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Draft Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) Order 2026
Ayes: 392
Noes: 116
Passed
178
PMQs Asked
7
Ministerial Questions Asked
50
House of Commons Debates Involved
1
Westminster Hall Debates Led
24
Statements / Bills
0
Petitions Presented
98
Voting Record
Activity Compared to Peers
How does this MP's parliamentary activity compare to the national average across 1370 MPs?
Prime Minister's Questions
+4763% above average
This MP:
178
Average:
3.7
Ministerial Questions
-48% below average
This MP:
7
Average:
13.4
Westminster Hall Debates Led
-60% below average
This MP:
1
Average:
2.5
Commons Chamber Debates
+929% above average
This MP:
50
Average:
4.9
Statements / Bills Proposed
+154% above average
This MP:
24
Average:
9.5
Petitions Presented
-100% below average
This MP:
0
Average:
2.5
Voting Attendance Rate (%)
-47% below average
This MP:
36.7
Average:
69.2
Important Context
- - Ministers answer questions rather than asking them, so have different activity patterns
- - Activity quantity doesn't measure quality or effectiveness of representation
- - Some MPs focus more on constituency work than parliamentary questions
- - Newly elected MPs will have less parliamentary history
About This Page
This page tracks Kemi Badenoch's parliamentary activity including questions asked, debates (Commons Chamber + Westminster Hall), statements/bills, and petitions presented.