Keir Starmer
MP for Holborn and St Pancras
Lab
Questions Asked by This MP
Parliamentary questions and government responses.
Response classifications show how directly each question was answered.
Sir Brian's report is a victory for all those campaigners and victims who fought so hard for this moment, including my right hon. Friend the Member for Kingston upon Hull North (Dame Diana Johnson), but it is also one of profound pain, anger and sadness for so many. There is a chance for us to make real progress on this issue and we must do that with victims in mind. Given the degree of cross-party consensus that we have already seen on apologies and compensation, and given the Government's promise to ensure compensation by the end of the year, will the Prime Minister also now promise to deliver on all the recommendations in the same timeframe, by the end of the year?
Context
Victims of the infected blood scandal have been waiting for compensation, and there is cross-party consensus on delivering it by year-end.
Rishi Sunak
Of course we want to deliver on the recommendations as quickly as practically possible. Indeed, our expectation is that we can do that before the end of the year. As I said, Sir Robert's appointment will bring a wealth of experience; it is crucial that the chair has the knowledge, expertise and familiarity with the issues.
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
We need reform. I saw at first hand how important reform is during my time running the Crown Prosecution Service, but I also saw how hard it is, particularly on cultural issues. It requires brave and difficult decisions. Eleven years ago, as Health Secretary, the now Chancellor said: 'The era of gagging NHS staff from raising their real worries about patient care must come to an end.' Eleven years on from that and 10 months on from the Lucy Letby case, there are still clear examples of NHS managers still gagging staff and then being moved on, instead of being moved out. Will the Prime Minister now commit to ensuring that those who gag and silence whistleblowers will no longer be able to work in the NHS?
Context
The Health Secretary had previously promised to end gagging of NHS staff raising concerns, but recent cases show managers still silencing whistleblowers.
Rishi Sunak
Of course the behaviour that the right hon. and learned Gentleman describes is wrong and, I believe, already illegal under our laws, but we will ensure people have the ability to raise concerns. One thing that I know has given many of those who have been impacted by the scandal some reassurance is the appointment of Sir Robert Francis to be chair of the inquiry.
Assessment
Did not commit to ensuring no one can continue working in NHS if they gag whistleblowers.
Already Illegal
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
In his report, Sir Brian identified a number of individual failures, even cover-ups, but alongside that he also found equally important and harder to reach institutional and cultural failings. The NHS does a remarkable job every day, but those failings are indefensible. Does the Prime Minister agree that the very culture of the NHS needs to change?
Context
Sir Brian Langstaff's report identified institutional and cultural failings within the NHS, such as a defensive attitude that refused to acknowledge problems.
Rishi Sunak
Yes, Mr Speaker. I discussed this issue on Monday in my response to the question asked by my right hon. Friend the Member for Bromsgrove (Sir Sajid Javid). The NHS provides lifesaving care to so many people every single day, for which we are enormously grateful, but the report makes it crystal clear that there were significant failings. The NHS failed: it failed people and it let them down.
Assessment
Did not commit to specific actions or timelines for cultural change.
Working With The Nhs
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
I understand that the Prime Minister wants to look at the recommendations in detail and to come back to them in due course, but we cannot look away on this duty of candour. Can I ask the Prime Minister at least to expand the call for evidence on the duty of candour beyond health? We owe it to the victims of Hillsborough and Horizon to work across the House to establish a far-reaching and binding duty of candour as quickly as possible.
Context
Sir Brian Langstaff's report highlighted the need for a binding duty of candour to address failures like those seen in the Horizon scandal, including Hillsborough.
Rishi Sunak
The right hon. and learned Gentleman will remember that on Monday I said very specifically that the patterns of behaviour we have seen in this appalling tragedy have been replicated in others, and I mentioned Hillsborough specifically, so I am very aware that there are structural and behavioural cultural problems that we need to fix. There is an enormous amount of support and sympathy for the principle of the duty of candour.
Assessment
Did not commit to expanding call for evidence beyond health.
Under Review
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
The infected blood scandal is shocking and familiar: concerns raised and ignored; reports written but not acted on; victims and families campaigning for years just to be heard. I want to focus on the duty of candour that has been a failing in scandals like Grenfell, Horizon, Hillsborough, and now the infected blood scandal. The Government have called for evidence on the duty of candour in health, but this should apply across public servants across the board. Does the PM agree it is time to enshrine the duty of candour in law?
Context
The infected blood scandal is a pattern of concerns being ignored, reports written but not acted on, victims campaigning for years to be heard. The Prime Minister called for evidence on the duty of candour in health.
Rishi Sunak
I am aware of Sir Brian Langstaff's recommendation for a duty of candour and accountability. My right hon. Friend introduced this duty to the health service. The Government are taking time to digest report findings, as wrongs committed are devastating and life-altering; ensuring nothing like this happens again is a priority. We sympathize with that and are reviewing recommendations in detail before providing comprehensive response.
Assessment
The questioner asked for direct agreement on enshrining duty of candour in law but did not receive specific commitment, instead receiving general support and acknowledgment of the recommendation's gravity.
Under Review
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
I welcome Figen Murray from the Gallery who lost her son Martyn seven years ago today in the Manchester Arena attack. We remember everybody who was lost in that awful attack. The infected blood scandal reflects a profound failure across almost every part of the British state. In apologies and compensation, this House was united; however, we have too many times heard similar sentiments from both sides. Does the PM agree that real progress only happens if we tackle lack of openness, transparency and candour identified by Sir Brian Langstaff?
Context
The infected blood scandal reflects a failure across parts of the British state. The House was united in its apology and compensation discussions, but there are ongoing issues.
Rishi Sunak
The inquiry was established to get truth and provide answers; this week's report represents a significant moment. This was an appalling scandal with diligent work by all those who supported Sir Brian Langstaff. We pay tribute to bravery of every individual who came forward for justice. I agree with the right hon. and learned Gentleman: we will listen and ensure nothing like this can happen again.
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
While I understand the need to upgrade our broadband infrastructure, it cannot be right that a company called BRSK is proposing to erect telegraph poles at the Squirrels estate in Hayley Green, in my constituency. The residents are 100% opposed to these proposals, which go against the guidance. Does the Prime Minister agree that BRSK should abandon its proposals, that there should be a review of permitted development rights in relation to this type of infrastructure, and that he should give Ofcom more power to investigate breaches?
Context
Residents of Hayley Green's Squirrels estate oppose BRSK's proposal to erect telegraph poles, claiming it violates guidance. James Morris seeks a review of permitted development rights and more power for Ofcom.
Rishi Sunak
I thank my hon. Friend for rightly championing the views of his constituents on this important topic. Network operators must follow legal obligations when deploying their networks and Ofcom can, in fact, investigate reports of failure to follow those obligations.
Assessment
Review of permitted development rights and additional power for Ofcom
Acknowledged Network Operator Obligations But Did Not Commit To Specific Actions
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
The Prime Minister is literally letting criminals out early. The only answer to the question that I have asked—whether domestic abusers should be exempt from his early release scheme—from anyone who is serious about security is yes. Does he not think that, rather than confiscating lanyards like some jumped-up milk monitor, he should stop issuing “Get out of jail free” cards to prisoners who are considered to be a risk to children?
Context
Keir Starmer questions the government's early release scheme, citing the Lewes report which shows domestic abusers are being released early.
Rishi Sunak
Another week with no ideas and absolutely no plans for the country! The Opposition have had 14 years to think about nothing but the future, but all they can do is talk about the past. Statistics have confirmed that we have had the joint fastest growth rate in the G7 this year.
Assessment
Domestic abusers and early release scheme exemptions
Changed Subject To Economic Growth
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Does the early release of stalkers, domestic abusers and those considered a risk to children sound like the work of someone who is making the country more secure?
Context
A prison inspection report found that high-risk prisoners were released at short notice without sufficient planning, raising concerns about public safety.
Rishi Sunak
As I said, no one should be put on the scheme if they are a threat to the public. Let me be crystal clear: it does not apply to anyone serving a life sentence, anyone convicted of a serious violent offence, anyone convicted of terrorism, or anyone convicted of a sex offence.
Assessment
Did not provide specific details about high-risk prisoners released early
Changed Subject Entirely
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Are any of the prisoners he is currently letting out early considered to be high-risk?
Context
The Prime Minister announced a prisoner release scheme, raising concerns about public safety.
Rishi Sunak
The right hon. and learned Gentleman just showed spectacularly why he is just not fit to lead this country into the future.
Assessment
Did not provide specific details about high-risk prisoners released early, instead attacked Keir Starmer
Changed Subject Entirely
Attacked Questioner
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Does the early release of stalkers, domestic abusers and those considered a risk to children sound like the work of someone who is making the country more secure?
Context
A prison inspection report found that high-risk prisoners were released at short notice without sufficient planning, raising concerns about public safety.
Rishi Sunak
As I said, no one should be put on the scheme if they are a threat to the public. Let me be crystal clear: it does not apply to anyone serving a life sentence, anyone convicted of a serious violent offence, anyone convicted of terrorism, or anyone convicted of a sex offence.
Assessment
Did not provide specific details about high-risk prisoners released early
Changed Subject Entirely
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Does the Prime Minister think that his decision to let prisoners out 70 days early makes our country more secure?
Context
The Prime Minister announced a prisoner release scheme which led to the release of prisoners early, raising concerns about public safety.
Rishi Sunak
There are strict eligibility criteria in place, with exclusions based on public safety. No one would be put on the scheme if they were deemed a threat to public safety.
Assessment
Did not provide specific details about early release such as number of prisoners or crimes committed
Changed Subject Entirely
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
The whole country knows that removing less than 1% of asylum seekers is not stopping the boats; it is granting an amnesty—a Tory amnesty. If the Prime Minister thinks the voters are wrong, that his own MPs who have joined the Labour party are wrong, and that anyone believes any of the nonsense that he spouts, why does he not put it to the test and call a general election?
Context
The MP criticises the Prime Minister's claim of victory on Rwanda.
Rishi Sunak
The right hon. and learned Gentleman talks about removing people—this is a person who campaigned to stop the deportation of foreign national offenders. That shows how out of touch his values are with the British people. It is yet another week where we have heard nothing about the right hon. and learned Gentleman's plan to do anything on the issues that matter to the country.
Assessment
The call for a general election was not addressed.
Changing Subject To Criticism Of Labour'S Values
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
I know that was the last run-out before the general election, but the Prime Minister is getting ahead of himself in asking me questions. I notice that the Prime Minister did not even attempt to answer the question. He knows the answer: since he claimed victory 16 days ago, there have been a staggering 2,400 small boat crossings. That is a gimmick, not a deterrent, and those 2,400 will be added to the Tories' asylum perma-backlog, which is forecast to rise to 100,000 by the end of the year. The Prime Minister pretends that he will remove them all to Rwanda, but Rwanda can take only a few hundred a year. At that rate, his grand plan would take over 300 years to remove them all. There are tens of thousands of people with their claims going unprocessed, who will be here for their entire lifetime, living in hotels at the taxpayers' expense. It is absurd to call that anything other than an amnesty handed to them by the Tory party, isn't it?
Context
The MP criticises the Prime Minister's lack of action since claiming victory on Rwanda.
Rishi Sunak
The right hon. and learned Gentleman had the opportunity to condemn the comments of his Mayor—a Mayor who said that there is an “equivalence” between Hamas and Israel—and he did not do that. Everyone will see: that is the changed Labour party right there. Since I became Prime Minister, small boat crossings are down by a third. That is because we have doubled National Crime Agency funding, increased enforcement rates, closed bank accounts, deported 24,000 people and processed more claims.
Assessment
The number of small boat crossings since the press conference was not directly addressed.
Changing Subject To Criticism Of Labour Mayor
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
It was great to be in Northallerton, where they have just voted to reject the Prime Minister's proposition. He has finally found something in common with the British public: no matter where he calls home, all his neighbours are backing this changed Labour party. They keep rejecting him, because they have sussed him out. They know there is nothing behind the boasts, the gimmicks and the smug smile. Sixteen days ago, when he held a press conference claiming victory on Rwanda, he said: “The next few weeks will be about action…people want deeds not words.” Let us test that. How many small boat crossings have there been since he said that 16 days ago?
Context
The MP criticises the Prime Minister's claim of victory on Rwanda, highlighting a lack of action since then.
Rishi Sunak
The right hon. and learned Gentleman had the opportunity to condemn the comments of his Mayor—a Mayor who said that there is an “equivalence” between Hamas and Israel—and he did not do that. Everyone will see: that is the changed Labour party right there. Since I became Prime Minister, small boat crossings are down by a third. That is because we have doubled National Crime Agency funding, increased enforcement rates, closed bank accounts, deported 24,000 people and processed more claims.
Assessment
The number of small boat crossings since the press conference was not directly addressed, only a general statement about reduction in crossings since becoming Prime Minister.
Changing Subject To Criticism Of Labour Mayor
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
I am surprised that the Prime Minister brought up a police investigation; his record is played one, lost—well, actually it is two, there was the seatbelt as well. His record is played two, lost two in relation to police investigations. The voters keep telling him that it is not good enough. Instead of listening, he keeps telling them that everything is fine, if only they would realise his greatness. He just does not get it, but at least after Thursday night he can go to the many places he calls home and enjoy the fruits of his success. In Southampton or Downing Street, he has great Labour councils. At his mansion in Richmond, he can enjoy a brand-new Labour Mayor of North Yorkshire. At his pad in Kensington, he can celebrate a historic third term for the Mayor of London. Now that he, too, can enjoy the benefits of this changed Labour party, is he really still in such a hurry to get back to California?
Context
The MP references the Prime Minister's past police investigations and his recent electoral losses in various areas, questioning if he truly understands these results.
Rishi Sunak
I must say that I was surprised to see the right hon. and learned Gentleman in North Yorkshire, although probably not as surprised as he was when he realised he could not take the tube there. I can tell him that the people of North Yorkshire believe in hard work, secure borders, lower taxes and straight-talking common sense. They will not get any of that from a virtue-signalling lawyer from north London.
Assessment
Did not answer whether the Prime Minister understands voter rejection; instead criticized Labour's values and policies.
Virtue-Signalling Lawyer
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
In addition to losing two Tory MPs in two weeks, the Prime Minister has been on the receiving end of some of the biggest by-election swings in history. He has also lost 1,500 Tory councillors, half of his party's Mayors and a leadership election to a lettuce. How many more times do the public and his own MPs need to reject him before he takes the hint?
Context
The MP highlights recent political losses for the Government, including by-election swings, loss of councillors, Mayors, and a leadership election defeat to someone representing lettuce.
Rishi Sunak
This time last year, I reminded the right hon. and learned Gentleman of some advice from his own mentor, Tony Blair, who said at the time that he “can be as cocky as he likes about the local elections; come a general election, policy counts.” One year on from that advice, what has he managed? He has £28 billion of tax rises, 70 new business regulations, 30 U-turns and a deputy leader under a police investigation.
Assessment
Did not answer how many rejections the Prime Minister needs; instead criticized Labour's policy record.
£28 Billion Of Tax Rises
70 New Business Regulations
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
May I warmly welcome my hon. Friend, the new Member for Blackpool South (Chris Webb)? After the representation that fine town has had recently, it is good to know that it has a proper champion back at last. May I also warmly welcome the new Labour MP, my hon. Friend the Member for Dover (Mrs Elphicke), to these Benches? If one week a Tory MP who is also a doctor says that the Prime Minister cannot be trusted with the NHS and joins Labour, and the next week the Tory MP for Dover—on the frontline of the small boats crisis—says that the Prime Minister “cannot be trusted” with our borders and joins Labour, what is the point of this failed Government staggering on?
Context
The MP welcomes new Labour MPs but questions the Prime Minister about the recent loss of Conservative MPs to Labour, including those who criticized the Government's handling of NHS and border security.
Rishi Sunak
Can I join the right hon. and learned Gentleman in welcoming his newest MP for Blackpool? He looks a lot happier than the Member sitting in that spot last week. Let me also join the right hon. and learned Gentleman in congratulating all new and paying tribute to all former councillors, police and crime commissioners and Mayors across the country. I hope that his new ones do him as proud as I am proud of all of mine, including such great leaders as Andy Street. They leave behind a strong legacy of more homes, more jobs and more investment, in sharp contrast to the legacy left by the last Labour Government, which was a letter joking that there was no money left.
Assessment
Did not address why MPs are joining Labour or lack of trust in government; focused on comparing current policies with previous Labour government's record instead.
Leave Behind A Strong Legacy
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Is it any wonder that the Prime Minister's MPs are following Tory voters in queuing up to dump his party? Until he starts setting out how he is paying for his fantasy economics, he has a completely unfunded £46 billion promise that puts people's retirement at risk. How does it feel to be one day out from elections with the message, “Vote Tory, risk your pension”?
Context
The question follows criticism of the government's £46 billion spending plans without clear funding sources. The PM is facing internal party pressure.
Rishi Sunak
Tomorrow, voters will have a choice. It will be a choice between Mayors like Andy Street and Ben Houchen, who are delivering, or Mayors like Sadiq Khan, who simply virtue-signal. It is higher taxes, more crime and the ultra low emission zone with Labour, or lower taxes and better services with the Conservatives—that is the choice.
Assessment
null
Changed Subject
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Last year, the Prime Minister was apparently drawing up plans to remove the winter fuel allowance from pensioners. Will the PM now rule out taking pensioners' winter fuel payments off them to help fund his £46 billion black hole?
Context
The question follows criticism of the government's £46 billion spending plans without clear funding sources. The Winter Fuel Payment is a key concern.
Rishi Sunak
It was this Government who, just this winter, provided double the winter fuel payment to support pensioners. What is crystal clear is that we believe that the double taxation on work is unfair. We believe that hard work should be rewarded, which is why this week, we are cutting taxes by £900 for everyone in work.
Assessment
null
Personal Attack
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
No, he has not said where it is coming from. Understandably, that will cause some alarm. Will the Prime Minister rule out forcing people to delay their retirement by years and years in order to fulfil his £46 billion black hole?
Context
The question follows criticism of the government's £46 billion spending plans without clear funding sources. Lord Frost suggested raising the state pension age to 75 as a solution.
Rishi Sunak
The Conservative party is the party that has delivered and protected the triple lock. Ultimately, he is not worried about any of this, because as we all remember, he has his very own personal pension plan. Indeed, it comes with its very own special law: it was called the Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations. It is literally one law for him and another one for everyone else.
Assessment
null
Personal Attack
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Has the Prime Minister found funds to keep his promise of scrapping national insurance? If £46 billion were cut, state pension value would almost halve. Why is he avoiding answering straightforward questions?
Context
Prime Minister did not address the date of election or pension questions. Cutting £46 billion from NI would reduce state pension value by half.
Rishi Sunak
We can rule that out and Labour should stop scaremongering. Thanks to the triple lock, pensions increased by £3,700 since 2010. Under Blair and Brown, pension taxes were raised by £118 billion with an insulting rise in state pension.
Assessment
Did not address funding for scrapping national insurance, instead criticized previous Labour governments' impact on pensions.
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Has the Prime Minister managed to find the money for his £46 billion promise to abolish national insurance? The Institute for Fiscal Studies said the link between NI and public services funding is illusory, like Labour's economic plans. Only the Conservative party can deliver tax cuts for working Britain.
Context
Prime Minister has a £46 billion promise to scrap national insurance but no found money. Labour's shadow Education Secretary says it's not how it works.
Rishi Sunak
Economics may not be his strong point, but he should listen to his shadow Education Secretary who said it's not how it works. IFS has also said the link between NI and public services funding is illusory.
Assessment
Did not address finding money for scrapping national insurance, only dismissed Labour's economic stance.
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Joining the Prime Minister's remarks about recent attacks and King's recovery. Welcoming new Labour MP from Conservative background. When lifelong Tory and doctor says only a Labour Government can fix NHS issues, should not the PM admit failure?
Context
The Prime Minister expressed condolences for the Hainault attack. A Labour MP has switched to the Labour party, concluding that a changed Labour party can cure NHS issues.
Rishi Sunak
The hon. Member for Central Suffolk and North Ipswich recently pointed out that under local Labour council, residents pay more in council tax but receive lower quality services.
Assessment
Avoided addressing the NHS or acknowledging failure by focusing on a former Tory's comment about local services.
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Two chances were given for ruling out cuts to state pensions or tax hikes. Will he now rule out these measures?
Context
The issue revolves around the Prime Minister's promise to scrap national insurance without providing details on how this will be funded.
Rishi Sunak
We have delivered a £900 increase to state pensions and committed to the triple lock. The NHS is better run under Conservatives than Labour in Wales.
Assessment
Cuts to state pensions or tax increases were not directly addressed.
Highlighted Achievements Instead
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
No single politician has ever put tax up more times than the Prime Minister. Will he now rule out cutting NHS funding or state pensions to pay for scrapping national insurance?
Context
The question arises from the Prime Minister's refusal to rule out tax hikes or service cuts to fund his promise of scrapping national insurance.
Rishi Sunak
I make absolutely no apology about wanting to end the unfairness of double taxation on work. The NHS is receiving record funding under this Conservative Government and Pensioners have just received a £900 increase.
Assessment
Cuts to state pensions or tax increases were not directly addressed.
Avoided Ruling Out Cuts
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Actually, when the Prime Minister was running for leader, he explained how he was funnelling money from poor areas to pay it into richer areas. We know what his record is. I notice the Prime Minister is not denying the £46 billion promise to scrap national insurance, but he is refusing to say where the money will come from. We have been trying for months to get to the bottom of this, so now is his chance. No more spin, no more waffle, no more diversion—I know that will be difficult. This is the choice: either he can cut the state pension or the NHS, which national insurance funds—that is route one—or he can put up income tax. Which one is it?
Context
The questioner criticizes the Prime Minister for refusing to address where funding comes from for his £46 billion promise to scrap national insurance.
Rishi Sunak
We have just cut taxes by £900 for a typical worker. We have delivered the biggest tax cut for businesses since the 1980s. But while we are cutting taxes, Labour is already putting them up. In Wales, it is putting up taxes right now for small businesses. In Birmingham, it is putting up council tax by 21%. In London, the Labour Mayor has put up taxes by 70%. This is just a glimpse of what they would do if they got into power. A few weeks ago, the right hon. and learned Gentleman finally admitted it to The Sun. What did he say he would do? He said, “We would put up taxes.” It is always the same: higher taxes, and working people paying the price.
Assessment
Did not specify funding source for scrapping national insurance
Criticized Labour'S Tax Policies
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
I appreciate the Prime Minister having the stomach to say that out loud, but everyone knows that it is the Tory party's obsession with wild, unfunded tax cuts that crashed the economy. We know it, he knows it and his party knows it, and the whole country is living it. When is he finally going to learn the lesson from his predecessor's mistakes and explain where the money is coming from for his own completely unfunded £46 billion promise to scrap national insurance?
Context
The questioner argues that the Tory party's obsession with unfunded tax cuts has crashed the economy.
Rishi Sunak
When my predecessor was running for leader, I did have—to use the right hon. and learned Gentleman's words—the stomach to argue out loud about her economic policies. I had the conviction to say that they were wrong—not once, but twice. He tried to make his predecessor Prime Minister, despite him opposing NATO and Trident, ignoring antisemitism and siding with our enemies. It is clear what the right hon. and learned Gentleman did: he put his own interests ahead of Britain's.
Assessment
Did not explain where funding comes from for scrapping national insurance
Criticized Labour'S Political Stances
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
We have a billionaire Prime Minister, and a billionaire—[Interruption.] Both of whose families have used schemes to avoid millions of pounds of tax, smearing a working-class woman. [Interruption.] The former Prime Minister has a long list of people to blame for the economic misery. Conservative Members do not want to hear it, but they made her Prime Minister, and millions of people are paying the price. She blames the Governor of the Bank of England, the Treasury, the Office for Budget Responsibility. The American President is blamed at one point. We even learn that the poor old lettuce was part of the “deep state”. Does the Prime Minister agree that it is actually much simpler than that? It was the Tories' unfunded tax cuts—tens of billions of pounds of unfunded tax cuts—that crashed the economy and left millions paying more for their mortgages, wasn't it?
Context
The questioner criticizes the current Prime Minister for being a billionaire with family tax avoidance schemes, linking this to economic issues.
Rishi Sunak
Everyone knows that two years ago I was not afraid to repeatedly warn about what my predecessor's economic policies would lead to, even if it was not what people wanted to hear at the time. I was right then, but I am also right now when I say that the right hon. and learned Gentleman's economic policies would be a disaster for Britain. He would send inflation up, mortgages up and taxes up, and working people would pay the price.
Assessment
Did not address whether Tory tax cuts were responsible for crashing the economy
Criticized Labour'S Economic Policies
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
I, too, welcome the postmasters in the Gallery, in their quest for justice. This week we marked 35 years since the disaster at Hillsborough, and the enduring courage and determination of the families must be marked by the passing of a Hillsborough law. We also lost Lord Richard Rosser, a lifelong member of the Labour party. He will be greatly missed, and our thoughts are with his wife Sheena and his family and friends. I am privileged to be the proud owner of a copy of the former Prime Minister's new book. It is a rare unsigned copy; it is the only unsigned copy. It is quite the read. She claims that the Tory party's disastrous kamikaze Budget, which triggered chaos for millions, was the “happiest moment” of her premiership. Has the Prime Minister met anyone with a mortgage who agrees?
Context
The former Prime Minister's new book mentions the 'happiest moment' as her time in office when she triggered chaos for millions due to a disastrous kamikaze Budget.
Rishi Sunak
All I would say is that the right hon. and learned Gentleman ought to spend a bit less time reading that book, and a bit more time reading the Deputy Leader's tax advice.
Assessment
Did not address whether any homeowners agreed with former Prime Minister's statement about Budget being happy moment
Criticized Labour
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
The Prime Minister has never had the courage to stand up to his party, so let me help him out and say to them what he wishes he could say: the mortgage mayhem, the waiting lists, the criminals walking free—they are the cost of Tory chaos. And if they cannot bring themselves to stop the endless games and gimmicks, and stop putting themselves before country, they should pack up, go home, and waste somebody else's time.
Context
Criticism regarding issues like mortgage challenges, NHS waiting lists, crime rates, and political instability within the Conservative party.
Rishi Sunak
The shadow Chancellor found time to make a one-hour speech last night, and we still do not know how Labour is going to pay for its £28 billion black hole. But while he tries to talk down Britain and the progress we are making, today's news shows that the plan is working—inflation down, energy bills down, wages up, pensions up, and taxes cut by £900.
Assessment
None specific asked for
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
I have prosecuted more people smugglers than the Prime Minister has had helicopter rides. This Rwanda gimmick is costing £2 million per person to deport 300 individuals. Why are they spending so much?
Context
The MP criticizes the government's crime policies.
Rishi Sunak
Thanks to our record and plan, violent crime has fallen by 50%. We have recruited more police officers, given them more powers and kept serious offenders in prison for longer. The right hon. and learned Gentleman voted against greater protection for emergency workers, opposed tougher sentences for violent criminals and failed to give police the powers they need.
Assessment
high costs of crime policies
Voted Against
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Why is the Prime Minister spending £2 million per person to deport 300 individuals when his Immigration Minister admitted the flights would not provide a credible deterrent?
Context
The MP questions the government's spending on the Rwanda deportation policy.
Rishi Sunak
The right hon. and learned Gentleman campaigned to stop the deportation of foreign dangerous criminals, defending terrorists and campaigning for criminals who were jailed for drugs dealing and carrying knives after he fought to keep them here.
Assessment
spending £2 million per person on ineffective policies
Campaigned Against Deportation
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
How has the Prime Minister spent £600 million on a Rwanda gimmick for deporting less than 1% of illegal immigrants when his own Immigration Minister admitted it would not provide a credible deterrent?
Context
The MP criticizes the government's approach to immigration and deportation.
Rishi Sunak
Thanks to our new laws, 900 criminals have been arrested and 450 have been convicted, serving over 370 years behind bars. The right hon. and learned Gentleman campaigned against giving the police new powers to crack down on people-smuggling gangs.
Assessment
spending £600 million on ineffective policies
Campaigning Against
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Can the Prime Minister see any flaw in his plan to deport less than 1% of illegal immigrants when they have already spent £600 million and only managed to deport 300 people?
Context
The MP questions the effectiveness of the government's Rwanda deportation plan.
Rishi Sunak
Since I became Prime Minister, the number of small boat crossings is actually down by over a third. We have doubled National Crime Agency funding and increased illegal immigration enforcement raids by 70%, closing 7,500 bank accounts, deporting 24,000 illegal migrants and processing over 112,000 cases.
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
I thank the Prime Minister for welcoming Vaughan Gething to his post but question why he is scared to call an election given high inflation, early release of violent prisoners, small boat arrivals, NHS struggles, mortgage payments, pensioner impact, and a budget deficit?
Context
The MP mentions the recent appointment of Vaughan Gething as First Minister of Wales and criticizes various policies of the government.
Rishi Sunak
As I said in January, my working assumption is that the election will be in the second half of the year. The Leader of the Opposition has time to come up with a plan for Britain and we are looking forward to seeing it.
Assessment
calling an election
Out Of Everybody, He Would Be Grateful
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Premier league clubs like Gloucester Rugby received £150 million in loans during the pandemic to stay solvent. Some clubs are concerned that current loan repayment schemes could be harmful to their finances. Will you ask the Sports Minister and the Treasury to find a solution?
Context
Clubs like Gloucester Rugby were funded during the pandemic through loans authorised by the Prime Minister. Concerns have been raised about repayment schemes potentially crippling financially fragile clubs.
Rishi Sunak
We provided £150 million during the pandemic. The Department for Culture, Media and Sport is working with Sport England to address concerns from borrowers. We are also talking to Rugby Football Union and Premiership League about securing the future of rugby.
Assessment
The specifics of finding a solution were not addressed directly.
Under Review
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
We have the highest tax burden since WWII, and your Chancellor promised £46 billion that isn't funded. You tried this before, and everyone else paid the price. Now you're avoiding an election by pretending everything can be funded without cutting pensions or the NHS. Why are you too scared to face the public?
Context
The question follows a previous announcement of £46 billion in unfunded commitments. Keir Starmer criticizes the Prime Minister's inability to fund these promises without impacting pensioners or reducing NHS spending.
Rishi Sunak
Pensions are going up by around £900 this year due to our plans. We have cut taxes for every person in work and invested in the NHS. The Labour party's promise of £28 billion is unfunded, so why don't they come clean about their plan?
Assessment
The specific funding details requested.
Working With Partners
Under Review
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Will the PM's unfunded proposal to scrap national insurance be paid for by cuts to state pensions or NHS funding?
Context
The Prime Minister has proposed scrapping national insurance contributions, a £46 billion promise.
Rishi Sunak
The Budget has not been addressed yet; it is time for the shadow Chief Secretary to speak about their plans.
Assessment
Did not address funding mechanism or specifics of the promise.
Changed Subject
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
The difference is that the Prime Minister is scared of his party; I have changed my party. The problem is that the PM is describing a Labour party that no longer exists; I am describing a man who is bankrolling the Conservatives' upcoming general election.
Context
The Prime Minister is described as being afraid of his party, while the questioner changed his.
Rishi Sunak
The MP's past actions and values are questioned, including representation of Hizb ut-Tahrir and letting antisemitism flourish in the Labour party.
Assessment
None specific asked.
Criticized Opposition
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
How many racist, misogynistic threats would the funding source need to make before the Prime Minister returns the £10 million he has received?
Context
The Prime Minister is funded by an individual who used offensive language.
Rishi Sunak
The gentleman apologized sincerely for his comments and that remorse should be accepted. The MP's deputy Leader called opponents 'scum', and others used similar language.
Assessment
Completely avoided the question of returning funds.
Changed Subject
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Welcomes the legislation addressing the Post Office scandal. Sends condolences for Tommy McAvoy's passing. The Prime Minister is funded by someone who made offensive remarks about black women. Is he proud of this?
Context
The Post Office scandal has led to legislative action. Tommy McAvoy, a loyal Labour supporter, passed away recently.
Rishi Sunak
The comments were wrong and racist, an apology was given, which should be accepted. There is no place for racism in Britain.
Assessment
Did not address the question of pride or commitment to funding source.
Repeated Point
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
At the moment, as everyone in this House knows, we are failing in ensuring a safe workplace here in Westminster. When will the Prime Minister make time for the vote on banning from Parliament those MPs who face allegations of sex offences?
Context
The question relates to the confidence women have in their safety at Westminster, particularly following the publication of the Angiolini report.
Rishi Sunak
It is absolutely right that we ensure our communities are safe for women and girls, which is why we passed the Domestic Abuse Act 2021, set up a new victim support line, quadrupled funding for victim support, and invested in practical things like CCTV and better streetlighting. This Government have a strong track record on ensuring that women across this country feel safe.
Assessment
Shifted focus to overall safety measures without addressing the specific vote request
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
We all want more victims to come forward, but we have to be honest that unless things change, the criminal justice system will continue to fail them. That is why we are committed to introducing specialist rape and sexual offences teams in every force to give victims specialist support and confidence that their experience will be investigated properly. When will the Prime Minister commit to doing the same?
Context
The question addresses the lack of confidence women have in the current criminal justice system regarding rape cases.
Rishi Sunak
We have already implemented the rape review action plan, ending digital strip searches of victims' mobile phones, ensuring better use of pre-recorded cross examination, rolling out Operation Soteria across all police forces, and significantly increasing the number of independent advisers. There is more specialist training in all police forces for these prosecutions.
Assessment
Did not specify timeline or commitment to introducing teams
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Sarah Everard's murder should have been a watershed moment for policing reform, for the criminal justice system and for violence against women and girls, but the sad reality is that victims of rape who come forward have just a 2.4% chance of their perpetrator being caught and charged within the year. How does the Prime Minister expect women to have confidence in the criminal justice system when almost all rapists do not see the inside of a courtroom?
Context
The question stems from the low conviction rate for rape cases, which is reported to be only 2.4% within a year of reporting.
Rishi Sunak
As we acknowledged a couple of years ago, we need to do more to improve rape outcomes in the criminal justice system. The rape review action plan has increased average sentences by a third since Labour was last in office and police referrals have doubled along with charges. Last year there was a 50% increase in rape convictions, and now rapists will serve every day of their sentence.
Assessment
Did not specify when or how recommendations would be implemented
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
I am obviously very familiar with codes in criminal justice systems, but—[Interruption.] This is too serious for that. There is a world of difference between a code and binding mandatory standards which do not have legal effect, and that should trouble Members across the House. Couzens' history of sexual offending stretched back many years. On four occasions, despite allegations of indecent exposure, he was not sacked. We know that indecent exposure is a gateway to more horrific crimes, as was tragically shown to be the case not only in Sarah Everard's case but in that of Libby Squire, but it is not treated with the seriousness required. The Angiolini report recommends reviewing all indecent exposure allegations against serving officers in order to identify, investigate and remove those officers from service. Given the obvious urgency of this recommendation, can the Prime Minister give a categorical assurance that it will be implemented immediately?
Context
Indecent exposure is a gateway to more serious crimes, as shown by cases like Sarah Everard's.
Rishi Sunak
The Home Secretary addressed this specifically when he made his statement. Indecent exposure, just like any other kind of sexually motivated crime, is abhorrent and we expect police chiefs to take it extremely seriously. We fully expect police chiefs to suspend an officer charged with any kind of sexually motivated crime. It is worth pointing out that, in addition to the new powers that the Home Secretary outlined about automatic suspension, chief constables have existing powers to suspend any officer in their force when allegations are made, and we fully expect them to use those powers.
Assessment
Specific commitment or timeline for immediate review was not provided
Expect Police Chiefs To Take It Seriously
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
The Prime Minister mentions vetting and I just want to press him on that, because serious failures in police vetting were raised in independent reports as long ago as 2012, 2019, 2022 and 2023. That is why Labour has been arguing for mandatory national vetting standards that would stop anybody with a history of domestic abuse or sexual offending being allowed to join the police in the first place. Why are mandatory national vetting standards not already in place?
Context
Independent reports since 2012 have raised serious failures in police vetting.
Rishi Sunak
It is vital for public confidence that those who are not fit to wear the badge are rooted out of the police and not able to join in the first place. That is why the College of Policing updated its statutory code on vetting, and that happened quickly. In addition, the policing inspectorate carried out a rapid inspection of all forces' progress against the previous findings and, in addition to that, an entire check against the national police database was carried out for all serving officers and staff.
Assessment
Specific commitment or timeline for implementing mandatory standards was not provided
Updated Statutory Code
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Three years ago, Sarah Everard was walking home when she was abducted and murdered by a serving police officer who should have been trusted to keep her safe. As a father, I cannot imagine the pain her parents, her family and her friends are going through in this difficult anniversary week. Lady Angiolini's report exposes the appalling failure in police vetting and in misconduct processes, and I am very troubled by its conclusion that there is 'nothing to stop another Couzens operating in plain sight'. How can that be the case, three years on from this horrendous crime?
Context
Sarah Everard was abducted and murdered by a serving police officer. The Angiolini report highlights issues with police vetting.
Rishi Sunak
Can I first say that I am sure all Members of the House will have been thinking about Sarah Everard in recent weeks? It was, as the right hon. and learned Gentleman said, an absolutely shocking case, and the abuse of power in particular was appalling. That is why we took action quickly to strengthen police vetting and strengthen the rules for rooting out officers who are not fit to serve, and conducted the largest ever screening of all serving officers and staff. We are now ensuring that any officer who has been charged with a crime will be suspended from duty automatically until their case is concluded, and we will thoroughly consider all the report's recommendations and respond in full.
Assessment
null
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
These are no longer the Tories your parents voted for, and the public can see it. The Prime Minister has lost control of his party to the hordes of redcoats and malcontents. When will he ever stand up to them and end the pathetic spectacle?
Context
The Prime Minister is accused of losing control to extremists in his party who undermine him.
Rishi Sunak
That is utterly shameless from someone who stood by while antisemitism ran rife in his party, oversaw the appalling situation in Rochdale and twice backed Jeremy Corbyn. While the right hon. and learned Gentleman might want to bend to mob rule, we will face down the extremists and stand up for British values.
Assessment
null
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
So this diverse Tory party does welcome Nigel Farage. Two months ago, the Prime Minister said that “the Tory party is a broad church. I welcome lots of people who want to subscribe to our ideals, to our values.” That is the same Nigel Farage who said he agreed with the basic premise of Enoch Powell's “Rivers of blood” speech and bemoaned the influence of the Jewish lobby. Is the Prime Minister simply too scared to stand up to the gaggle of Tory MPs who moonlight as GB News presenters, or does he genuinely think that Nigel Farage shares the ideals and values of the Tory party?
Context
The Prime Minister had previously said that the Tory party is a broad church, raising questions about whether Nigel Farage would be welcomed back.
Rishi Sunak
The right hon. and learned Gentleman wants to talk about values, but tomorrow in Rochdale the people will have a choice of three former Labour candidates, two of whom are antisemites. The truth is, his party is so mired in hate that despite three ex-Labour candidates standing, he cannot back a single one of them. We expel antisemites—he makes them Labour candidates.
Assessment
The Prime Minister did not address whether Nigel Farage would be welcomed back into the Tory party; instead, he highlighted Labour's handling of antisemitic members.
Antisemites In Labour
Backing Former Labour Candidates
Session: PMQs
View Full Session -->
Thank you for those words, which John's family will have heard. There are many Members of this House who serve their constituents faithfully. Some deliver change for the entire country. Very few enter into public consciousness, let alone public affection. But John Prescott achieved all those things. He was absolutely unique and people loved him for it.
Context
Following Speaker Lindsay Hoyle's statement about the death of former MP John Prescott, Keir Starmer provides a tribute to him.
N/A
John Prescott had an extraordinary life from failing his 11-plus to being deputy leader of the Labour party. He was a politician for working people through and through, serving Hull for four decades and leading on climate change, regional inequality, supporting the minimum wage, public transport transformation, council house building, and completing the channel tunnel. He brought people together in negotiations and within his own party, often challenging those he usually agreed with to improve the final outcome.
Session: Lord Prescott
View All Questions -->
Other Parliamentary Activity
Debates led and petitions presented.
Backbench Business
16 July 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
Public Office (Accountability) Bill
14 July 2026
Bill Debate
Contributed to this debate
Lebanon: Israel Defence Forces Operations
03 June 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
Asked the Under-Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs to make a statement on the Israel Defence Forces’ operations in Lebanon. Emphasised that the IDF is expanding its i...
Debate on the Address
13 May 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
Points of Order
29 April 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
The Member for Hornsey and Friern Barnet raised concern about the recent violent stabbings in the borough of Barnet, expressing worry over repeated violence against the Jewish community. She called on...
Middle East
13 April 2026
Ministerial Statement
Led by this MP
Middle East
02 March 2026
Ministerial Statement
Led by this MP
Standards in Public Life
09 February 2026
Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate
Points of Order 2026-02-04
04 February 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
China and Japan 2026-02-02
02 February 2026
General Debate
Led by this MP
The Prime Minister outlined the importance of engaging with both China and Japan to safeguard national interests. He discussed his recent visit, highlighting the strengthening of UK-US relations, rese...
Attendance
6.0%
5 of 83 votes
Aye Votes
3
3.6% of votes
No Votes
2
2.4% of votes
Abstentions
78
94.0% of votes
01 Jul 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Employment Tribunal (Extension of Time Limits) (Miscellaneous Amendments and...
Ayes: 322
Noes: 107
Passed
01 Jul 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) (Amendment...
Ayes: 318
Noes: 107
Passed
01 Jul 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 2
Ayes: 80
Noes: 281
Failed
01 Jul 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 4
Ayes: 173
Noes: 282
Failed
01 Jul 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: New Clause 5
Ayes: 177
Noes: 308
Failed
24 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Customs (Tariff and Miscellaneous Amendments) (No. 4) Regulations 2026
Ayes: 323
Noes: 160
Passed
24 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Draft Carbon Budget Order 2026
Ayes: 332
Noes: 94
Passed
24 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Draft Climate Change Act 2008 (International Aviation and International Shipp...
Ayes: 329
Noes: 94
Passed
24 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Draft Climate Change Act 2008 (Credit Limit) Order 2026
Ayes: 330
Noes: 93
Passed
23 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Opposition day: Defence spending and readiness
Ayes: 108
Noes: 307
Failed
23 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Opposition Day Motion: Defence spending and readiness - Prime Minister's Amen...
Ayes: 294
Noes: 110
Passed
23 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Opposition Day: Puberty blockers
Ayes: 112
Noes: 283
Failed
22 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: New Clause 4
Ayes: 164
Noes: 311
Failed
22 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: New Clause 11
Ayes: 104
Noes: 391
Failed
22 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: New Clause 22
Ayes: 74
Noes: 323
Failed
22 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Armed Forces Bill Report Stage: Amendment 11
Ayes: 171
Noes: 322
Failed
17 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
National Security (State Threats) Bill: Allocation of Time motion
Ayes: 233
Noes: 94
Passed
17 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: Amendment 3
Ayes: 85
Noes: 317
Failed
17 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: Amendment 8
Ayes: 143
Noes: 249
Failed
17 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: Amendment 13
Ayes: 135
Noes: 258
Failed
17 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
National Security (State Threats) Bill Committee: New Clause 3
Ayes: 144
Noes: 244
Failed
16 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remainin...
Ayes: 77
Noes: 255
Failed
16 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remainin...
Ayes: 151
Noes: 258
Failed
16 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill Remainin...
Ayes: 162
Noes: 246
Failed
16 Jun 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Draft Clean Air Zones Central Services (Fees) (England) (Amendment) Regulatio...
Ayes: 262
Noes: 86
Passed
24 Feb 2026
VOTED NO
Opposition Day: Protections for children from online harms
Ayes: 69
Noes: 279
Failed
23 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill Committee: Amendment 1
Ayes: 161
Noes: 272
Failed
23 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill Committee: New Clause 2
Ayes: 156
Noes: 273
Failed
23 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill Committee: New Clause 3
Ayes: 77
Noes: 280
Failed
23 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill Committee: New Clause 3
Ayes: 73
Noes: 256
Failed
23 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill: Third Reading
Ayes: 361
Noes: 84
Passed
11 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Draft Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) (Extension to Marit...
Ayes: 362
Noes: 107
Passed
11 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Local Government Finance Report (England) 2026-27
Ayes: 277
Noes: 143
Passed
11 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Referendums Relating to Council Tax Increases (Principles) (England) Report 2...
Ayes: 279
Noes: 90
Passed
04 Feb 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Draft Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) Order 2026
Ayes: 392
Noes: 116
Passed
03 Feb 2026
VOTED AYE
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill: Second Reading
Ayes: 458
Noes: 104
Passed
28 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Opposition Day: British Indian Ocean Territory
Ayes: 103
Noes: 284
Failed
28 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Opposition Day: Youth unemployment
Ayes: 91
Noes: 287
Failed
28 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Draft Medical Devices (Fees Amendment) Regulations 2026
Ayes: 294
Noes: 108
Passed
27 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Amendment 9
Ayes: 91
Noes: 378
Failed
27 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Amendment 2
Ayes: 61
Noes: 311
Failed
27 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Amendment 1
Ayes: 88
Noes: 310
Failed
21 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill Commi...
Ayes: 191
Noes: 326
Failed
21 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill Commi...
Ayes: 195
Noes: 317
Failed
21 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: Thir...
Ayes: 316
Noes: 194
Passed
21 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
The Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 (Remedial...
Ayes: 373
Noes: 106
Passed
20 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Sentencing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 7
Ayes: 319
Noes: 127
Passed
20 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill: motion to...
Ayes: 344
Noes: 182
Passed
20 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill: motion to...
Ayes: 347
Noes: 185
Passed
20 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill: motion to...
Ayes: 347
Noes: 184
Passed
681
PMQs Asked
1
Ministerial Questions Asked
95
House of Commons Debates Involved
0
Westminster Hall Debates Led
29
Statements / Bills
0
Petitions Presented
83
Voting Record
Activity Compared to Peers
How does this MP's parliamentary activity compare to the national average across 1457 MPs?
Prime Minister's Questions
+18503% above average
This MP:
681
Average:
3.7
Ministerial Questions
-93% below average
This MP:
1
Average:
13.4
Westminster Hall Debates Led
-100% below average
This MP:
0
Average:
2.5
Commons Chamber Debates
+1855% above average
This MP:
95
Average:
4.9
Statements / Bills Proposed
+206% above average
This MP:
29
Average:
9.5
Petitions Presented
-100% below average
This MP:
0
Average:
2.5
Voting Attendance Rate (%)
-91% below average
This MP:
6.0
Average:
69.2
Important Context
- - Ministers answer questions rather than asking them, so have different activity patterns
- - Activity quantity doesn't measure quality or effectiveness of representation
- - Some MPs focus more on constituency work than parliamentary questions
- - Newly elected MPs will have less parliamentary history
About This Page
This page tracks Keir Starmer's parliamentary activity including questions asked, debates (Commons Chamber + Westminster Hall), statements/bills, and petitions presented.