Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Points of Order 2026-02-04

04 February 2026 · 3 other contributors

Opened by David Davis Con Goole and Pocklington

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

David Davis raised concerns about points of order 2026-02-04 in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Concerns raised during the debate on Points of Order on 2026-02-04
  • Specific asks of government were not recorded
  • Commitments made by the government were not recorded

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Other contributors (3)
  • David Davis Con Goole and Pocklington

    Asked for a point of order regarding the need to investigate Mandelson's relationship with Oleg Deripaska, citing decisions favouring Deripaska’s company by $200 million a year as European trade commissioner.

  • Alicia Kearns Con Rutland and Stamford

    Asked for a point of order to correct the Prime Minister's record regarding Labour’s use of the phrase 'national security' in their Humble Addresses while in opposition, noting that it was never mentioned.

  • Charlie Dewhirst Con Bridlington and The Wolds

    Asked for a point of order to clarify the Prime Minister’s earlier remarks denying being instructed by Phil Shiner, referencing a 2007 case where Keir Starmer QC was involved.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy