Mark Francois
MP for Rayleigh and Wickford
Con
Questions Asked by This MP
Parliamentary questions and government responses.
Response classifications show how directly each question was answered.
Prime Minister, as we approach remembrance time, will you throw Northern Ireland's war veterans to the wolves by repealing the 2023 Act designed to protect them?
Context
Concern over the repealing of the Northern Ireland Troubles Act which was intended to protect veterans from investigations.
Keir Starmer
I am not.
Assessment
Providing a specific reason for or against the repeal of the Northern Ireland Troubles Act
Changing Subject
Session: PMQs 2024-10-30
View Full Session -->
Over 130,000 motor vehicles are now stolen every year in the UK; there has been a 75% increase in England and Wales in a decade. Much of that theft happens through the exploitation of weaknesses in remote key fobs. Does the Minister agree that this crime trend is a major risk for users of motorised vehicles on our roads, and what steps will her Department and its agencies take to improve vehicle and fob design standards and regulation, as well as driver awareness, to prevent such crimes?
Context
The MP raised concern over the increasing number of motor vehicle thefts in the UK, noting a 75% increase over the past decade. He emphasized that much of this theft occurs through weaknesses in remote key fobs.
Lilian Greenwood
The hon. Member raises an important question. Our Department works closely with our colleagues in the Home Office to tackle crime of that sort. The Minister with responsibility for roads, my hon. Friend the Member for Wakefield and Rothwell (Simon Lightwood), would be happy to write to him about those regulations.
Session: Support for Road Users 2026-02-12
View All Questions -->
Given Operation Nova, should a veteran who fought for his country and ends up in court due to circumstances be entitled to put his defence in front of a jury?
Context
Operation Nova assists veterans who come into contact with the criminal justice system. The scenario involves an Afghanistan veteran accused of assault after being assaulted himself.
The Solicitor General (Ellie Reeves)
Jury trials make up 3% of cases currently heard in the criminal courts. It is important for both victims and defendants that they are not waiting years and years for their cases to get to court, which is happening as a result of the crisis that the previous Government left us in. The most serious cases will still be heard by juries—for example, rape, murder and grievous bodily harm cases—and it is important that justice is delivered swiftly.
Session: Jury Trials 2025-12-18
View All Questions -->
When will the work commence, when will the crossing be open to traffic, and which banks and companies will fund it?
Context
The lower Thames crossing is the second largest piece of infrastructure in the country after High Speed 2. There has been no clear timeline or funding source for its completion.
The Secretary of State for Transport (Heidi Alexander)
I have said to the right hon. Gentleman before that we are exploring private finance options to deliver the lower Thames crossing, having granted planning consent through a development consent order earlier this year. Enabling works, including utility works, could begin next year, before 2027, and the crossing should be open for use by vehicles in the mid-2030s.
Session: Transport Infrastructure Upgrades 2025-11-20
View All Questions -->
The former Labour Security Minister Lord West said recently that we “shouldn’t be doing” this. Lord Glasman, the founder of Blue Labour, said: “We must reverse it as soon as possible.” The hon. Member for Blackley and Middleton South (Graham Stringer) said that to continue this against one side makes no sense. With a Labour rebellion clearly brewing, and given that many Northern Ireland veterans were initially recruited from red wall seats, why are Labour Ministers insisting on driving their Back Benchers into the Division Lobby just to do Sinn Féin and their old comrades in the IRA a favour?
Context
Mark Francois quoted several critics of Labour's Northern Ireland Troubles Bill, including Lord West, Lord Glasman, and Graham Stringer. He questioned why Labour Ministers are pushing through the bill despite growing opposition.
The Minister for Veterans and People (Louise Sandher-Jones)
I urge the right hon. Gentleman to remember the really serious issues that are at stake here. The priorities of this Government, as we have shown repeatedly, are to do right by the families of more than 200 British service personnel who were murdered in Northern Ireland and to ensure that we have protections and appropriate measures in place to defend our veterans; we have five protections in law and a sixth that we have control over ourselves. I can assure the right hon. Gentleman again that the Government’s commitment to veterans is total.
Session: Army Recruitment 2025-11-03
View All Questions -->
As General Lord Dannatt, the former Chief of the General Staff, said at the weekend, “if potential recruits to our Armed Forces do not believe that their government will stand by them when performing their duties in a lawful manner, why risk joining at all?” He was speaking about Labour’s new Northern Ireland Troubles Bill, which could see Northern Ireland veterans, without whom there would never have been a Good Friday agreement in the first place, in the dock again by next year. The Minister called opponents of this “naive”. What is her response to the former head of the British Army and the brave soldiers he led—were they all naive, too?
Context
Mark Francois referenced comments by General Lord Dannatt regarding potential recruits' hesitations due to Labour's Northern Ireland Troubles Bill. He questioned the Minister’s response to this criticism.
The Minister for Veterans and People (Louise Sandher-Jones)
Seeing as the right hon. Gentleman is attacking me for something I did not say, I can only assume that he cannot attack me—He is very welcome to check Hansard, where he will see that I was very specifically referring to people spreading misinformation. He will be able to see it there in black and white in Hansard. This Government are committed to protecting those who serve. Our first and foremost priority is to protect and ensure the welfare of those who have served, just as we have done for many people who have served in our armed forces across multiple conflicts. I can assure the right hon. Gentleman again that the Government’s commitment to veterans is total.
Session: Army Recruitment 2025-11-03
View All Questions -->
The Government could have appealed to the Supreme Court on this but deliberately did not. I do not doubt the Secretary of State’s personal sincerity however, at Prime Minister’s questions on 15 January the Prime Minister promised veterans: We are working on a draft remedial order and replacement legislation, and we will look at every conceivable way to prevent these types of cases from claiming damages it is important that I say that on the record. Why then despite the PM’s solemn promise is the order still unchanged surely he is not expecting to order his own MPs many of whom represent red wall seats from which those veterans were originally recruited through the Aye Lobby just to do Gerry Adams a favour he is not going to do that, is he?
Context
On January 15, 2025, the Prime Minister promised to look at every conceivable way to prevent cases from claiming damages and honouring the duty towards Northern Ireland veterans.
The Secretary of State for Defence (John Healey)
The Prime Minister was right then and he is right now. I am working with the Northern Ireland Secretary to repeal and replace the legacy Act. We will honour the Prime Minister’s undertaking to this House and do right by the duty that this nation holds to those veterans who served for more than 38 years during the troubles in Northern Ireland.
Session: Operation Banner Legal Protection for Veterans 2025-06-30
View All Questions -->
According to the 2021 census there are more than two million veterans living in Great Britain clearly some of them have been busy lately their parliamentary petition entitled “Protect Northern Ireland Veterans from Prosecutions”, with support from the Daily Mail, the Express and others now has more than 160,000 signatures and will be debated in Parliament on July 14th. Which Minister will respond to that debate so that we can ask them why the Government’s current remedial order is drafted to help the likes of Gerry Adams sue the British taxpayer while throwing our veterans to the wolves?
Context
A parliamentary petition entitled “Protect Northern Ireland Veterans from Prosecutions” has gained over 160,000 signatures. The petition will be debated in Parliament on July 14th.
The Secretary of State for Defence (John Healey)
We welcome the petition, and we certainly welcome the parliamentary debate it is quite proper that Parliament debates these issues. The right hon Gentleman’s legacy Act offered false and undeliverable promises to the veterans of Northern Ireland. The last Government were warned that it would be unlawful and incompatible with the Windsor framework even the chief commissioner of the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery said that the Act has obvious problems, and that elements of it were dead in the water from the beginning. We are now fixing that flawed and failed legislation and we will do so in a way that honours our duty towards those veterans.
Session: Operation Banner Legal Protection for Veterans 2025-06-30
View All Questions -->
Our local paper reported that Labour-led Southend council and Lib Dem-led Rochford council plan a new town with up to 10,000 houses on their border by 2043, which is unsustainable given current infrastructure constraints. Would these houses be additional or part of the housing targets?
Context
Refers to a local paper revealing plans for building up to 10,000 houses in Southend and Rochford councils' area. Asks if these would be additional or part of the existing targets.
The Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Angela Rayner)
We have not selected locations yet; the taskforce is still working on recommendations. We have stated that what the new towns deliver will be in addition to housing targets produced through standard methods.
Session: New Towns 2025-04-07
View All Questions -->
Veterans who served in Northern Ireland will no doubt welcome the Veterans Minister’s decision—first suggested by the shadow Defence Secretary—that the MOD should judicially review the recent coroner’s verdict regarding the shooting of several IRA terrorists at Clonoe. Well done, I say, but why not go further to protect veterans, and drop the plans to revoke large parts of the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023, which would only serve to facilitate yet more inquests of this type?
Context
The MP discusses the MOD's decision to judicially review a recent coroner’s verdict regarding the shooting of several IRA terrorists at Clonoe. He suggests that further actions should be taken to protect veterans.
The Minister for Veterans and People (Al Carns)
The right hon. Member makes an important point. Having visited Northern Ireland just two weeks ago, I share the concerns of many veterans who have served in Northern Ireland, particularly concerns about the misinterpretation of the challenging context in which many of these inquests and inquiries are taking place. I remind Members on both sides of the House that not so long ago, in the ’70s, ’80s and ’90s, there were major explosions in every major city in the United Kingdom and assassinations across the UK. Killings were a regular event in Northern Ireland, and we sent our service personnel there to protect peace, save lives and, indeed, prevent a civil war.
Session: Support for Veterans 2025-03-24
View All Questions -->
Talking of access, several years ago, Greater Anglia demolished half of Wickford station to extend some of the platforms. However, after nearly three years of endless excuses, missed deadlines and, frankly, broken promises, it still has not rebuilt it. I regret to say that I have lost all confidence in the senior management of Greater Anglia. If they told me today was a Thursday, I would double-check it. Can I go over their head and ask the Secretary of State for a personal meeting with the Rail Minister so that we can finally get Wickford station rebuilt, despite Greater Anglia, rather than because of it?
Context
Greater Anglia demolished half of Wickford station to extend some platforms but has failed to rebuild it after nearly three years, with missed deadlines and broken promises. The questioner seeks a personal meeting with the Rail Minister to resolve this issue.
The Secretary of State for Transport (Heidi Alexander)
I will happily ask the Rail Minister to meet the right hon. Gentleman to ensure that progress can be made at Wickford.
Session: Open Access Railway Services 2025-02-13
View All Questions -->
On what day did the MOD submit its response to that key consultation—presumably in defence of service families’ interests—and will the Minister place a copy of that response in the Library?
Context
The Forces Pension Society has raised concerns about the proposed changes to death-in-service benefits taxation. The Minister is questioned on when the MOD submitted its response to HMRC's consultation.
The Minister for Veterans and People (Al Carns)
May I remind the right hon. Member of my service, and of the fact that I will in no way, shape or form take this for granted? I am putting all my effort into those discussions at the moment. My officials have discussed that with the Treasury, I have discussed it with the Treasury, and we will continue to discuss such issues with the Treasury to ensure that our armed forces personnel get the deal that they deserve.
Session: Armed Forces Death-in-service Payments 2025-02-10
View All Questions -->
On defence industrial strategy, the new amphibious multi-role support ships are several years away—a point the Armed Forces Minister obviously appreciated when, in opposition last January, he wrote to his local paper to say that scrapping HMS Albion and Bulwark would be bad for our national security, for the Royal Navy and for Devonport. When the Defence Committee looked at this issue a few years ago, it firmly concluded that the decision would be “militarily illiterate”, yet today the Ministry of Defence is all for it. Even if the Minister for Defence Procurement and Industry does not agree with the Defence Committee, does she at least agree with the Armed Forces Minister that these vital ships should be retained?
Context
The decision to retire the amphibious multi-role support ships HMS Albion and Bulwark has been criticized. The Member seeks clarification on whether the Ministry supports retaining these vessels.
The Minister for Defence Procurement and Industry (Maria Eagle)
Neither of the ships has been at sea for years—one since 2022 and the other since 2017—and neither was due to go back out to sea before their out-of-service date. The question of who might be said to have scrapped them is moot; the ships have not been scrapped, but we took the tough decision in November to retire ageing capabilities, so that we can save the money for dealing with the threats that we will face in future.
Session: Defence Industrial Strategy SMEs 2025-01-06
View All Questions -->
During debates on the Bill in Committee I raised the worrying issue that under the Treasury’s proposed inheritance tax changes, service personnel who are unmarried but in a long-term relationship could have their partner’s service benefit taxed should they die while in service. The Forces Pension Society has rightly highlighted that that would be totally contrary to the spirit of the armed forces covenant. Has the Minister yet raised this with the Treasury, as we strongly suggested last month he should, and if so what progress has been made?
Context
Mr Mark Francois raised concerns about proposed inheritance tax changes that could negatively impact unmarried but long-term cohabiting military personnel. He asks if the Minister has discussed this with the Treasury.
The Minister for the Armed Forces (Luke Pollard)
As the right hon. Gentleman will recall from the Bill Committee, which in parliamentary sitting days was only a few days ago, we are raising issues around a number of things, including the one he raises. It is subject to a consultation, as he knows, so a decision has not been made. It is a responsibility for the Treasury, rather than the Ministry of Defence, but I undertook to write to him, and I will do so.
Session: Armed Forces Commissioner Appointment 2025-01-06
View All Questions -->
How can we persuade people to remain in armed forces when they sense that the new Government do not really have their back? Will the Ministry of Defence start defending its veterans within Whitehall and argue against repealing the Northern Ireland Troubles Act 2023?
Context
The MP expressed concern over whether new recruits will feel supported if they sense the Government does not have their back, questioning plans to repeal a Northern Ireland Troubles Act.
Luke Pollard
The Government are renewing the contract between the nation and those who serve. We will support retention, recruitment, and our veterans through the work done in Cabinet by the Defence Secretary.
Session: Armed Forces Recruitment and Retention 2024-11-18
View All Questions -->
Many military personnel began their journey as cadets. The previous Government established hundreds of new cadet units in state schools. However, this Labour Government has withdrawn £1 million plus grant that supports cadet instructors. Will the Government urgently review this decision?
Context
The MP mentioned that many who join armed forces begin as cadets, noting the success of a previous Conservative government's programme. He criticized Labour for withdrawing critical grants to support cadet instructors in state schools.
Luke Pollard
The Minister for Veterans and People is reviewing the cadet force to ensure it continues playing a valuable role for young people, supporting the overall mission of defence.
Session: Armed Forces Recruitment and Retention 2024-11-18
View All Questions -->
How much has been offered to pay Mauritius for renting back a military facility, and which department will cover this cost?
Context
The Foreign Secretary concluded a deal with Mauritius over the Chagos islands.
John Healey
Full details of the deal will be set out when the treaty comes before Parliament. The government inherited a situation where the UK-US military base was at risk due to sovereignty and migration issues. A historic deal has secured the base for the future, welcomed by the US Defence Secretary.
Session: Strategic Defence Review 2024-10-14
View All Questions -->
When will the outcome of the strategic defence review be announced?
Context
The government commissioned a strategic defence review within two weeks of taking office.
John Healey
The Prime Minister commissioned the strategic defence review within two weeks of taking office. The review will ensure that the UK is secure at home and strong abroad, both now and in years to come. It will be reported to Parliament.
Session: Strategic Defence Review 2024-10-14
View All Questions -->
Other Parliamentary Activity
Debates led and petitions presented.
British Indian Ocean Territory 2026-01-28
28 January 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
Conservative MP Priti Patel argues that the United Kingdom should not cede sovereignty over the British Indian Ocean Territory to Mauritius, criticising Labour's £34.7 billion deal as harmful and detr...
Northern Ireland Troubles Legacy and Reconciliation 2026-01-21
21 January 2026
Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate
Chinese Embassy 2026-01-20
20 January 2026
Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate
Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill 2026-01-20
20 January 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
National security must always be the first priority of any Government, especially during uncertain times. The deal secures the vital military asset for future generations, allowing the base to continu...
Local Elections Cancellation 2026-01-19
19 January 2026
Urgent Question
Contributed to this debate
Will the Minister confirm that the scheduled local government elections in May 2026 will not be cancelled, and explain why it is necessary to do so at this late stage despite the Government's previous...
Human Rights Abuses Magnitsky Sanctions 2026-01-08
08 January 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
The motion expresses concern over the escalation of human rights abuses and corruption globally, highlighting the inconsistent implementation of Magnitsky sanctions in the UK. It urges for a more robu...
Subsea Telecommunications Cables Resilience and Crisis Preparedness 2026-01-08
08 January 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
The UK's subsea cables are critical to its economic prosperity and global influence, carrying 99% of international data and $1.5 trillion-worth in global cross-border trading. Vulnerabilities exist du...
Road Safety Strategy 2026-01-08
08 January 2026
General Debate
Contributed to this debate
The Minister highlighted the new national road safety strategy aimed at reducing deaths and serious injuries on British roads by 65% by 2035. She emphasised the current plateau in road safety improvem...
Animal Welfare Strategy 2025-12-18
18 December 2025
Urgent Question
Contributed to this debate
Will the Minister confirm that the Government’s animal welfare strategy, promised for the end of the year, will be published before Christmas? The urgency lies in the need to scrutinise the plans give...
Local Government Reorganisation 2025-12-18
18 December 2025
Ministerial Statement
Contributed to this debate
Attendance
63.6%
14 of 22 votes
Aye Votes
7
31.8% of votes
No Votes
7
31.8% of votes
Abstentions
8
36.4% of votes
03 Feb 2026
VOTED NO
Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill: Second Reading
Ayes: 458
Noes: 104
Passed
28 Jan 2026
VOTED AYE
Opposition Day: British Indian Ocean Territory
Ayes: 103
Noes: 284
Failed
28 Jan 2026
VOTED AYE
Opposition Day: Youth unemployment
Ayes: 91
Noes: 287
Failed
27 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Amendment 9
Ayes: 91
Noes: 378
Failed
27 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Amendment 1
Ayes: 88
Noes: 310
Failed
27 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Amendment 2
Ayes: 61
Noes: 311
Failed
21 Jan 2026
VOTED AYE
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill Commi...
Ayes: 195
Noes: 317
Failed
21 Jan 2026
VOTED NO
The Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 (Remedial...
Ayes: 373
Noes: 106
Passed
21 Jan 2026
VOTED NO
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill: Thir...
Ayes: 316
Noes: 194
Passed
21 Jan 2026
VOTED AYE
National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill Commi...
Ayes: 191
Noes: 326
Failed
20 Jan 2026
VOTED NO
Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill: motion to...
Ayes: 347
Noes: 184
Passed
20 Jan 2026
VOTED NO
Sentencing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 7
Ayes: 319
Noes: 127
Passed
20 Jan 2026
VOTED NO
Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill: motion to...
Ayes: 344
Noes: 182
Passed
20 Jan 2026
VOTED NO
Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill: motion to...
Ayes: 347
Noes: 185
Passed
13 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee: Clause 63 Stand part
Ayes: 348
Noes: 167
Passed
13 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee: New Clause 26
Ayes: 172
Noes: 334
Failed
13 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee: New Clause 9
Ayes: 181
Noes: 335
Failed
13 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee: Clause 86 stand part
Ayes: 344
Noes: 173
Passed
13 Jan 2026
VOTED AYE
Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee: New Clause 25
Ayes: 187
Noes: 351
Failed
13 Jan 2026
DID NOT VOTE
Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee: New Clause 24
Ayes: 184
Noes: 331
Failed
12 Jan 2026
VOTED AYE
Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee: New Clause 7
Ayes: 188
Noes: 341
Failed
12 Jan 2026
VOTED AYE
Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee: Amendment 3
Ayes: 185
Noes: 344
Failed
1
PMQs Asked
17
Ministerial Questions Asked
62
House of Commons Debates Involved
0
Westminster Hall Debates Led
0
Statements / Bills
0
Petitions Presented
22
Voting Record
Activity Compared to Peers
How does this MP's parliamentary activity compare to the national average across 649 MPs?
Prime Minister's Questions
-48% below average
This MP:
1
Average:
1.9
Ministerial Questions
+114% above average
This MP:
17
Average:
7.9
Westminster Hall Debates Led
-100% below average
This MP:
0
Average:
1.5
Commons Chamber Debates
+2522% above average
This MP:
62
Average:
2.4
Statements / Bills Proposed
-100% below average
This MP:
0
Average:
5.1
Petitions Presented
-100% below average
This MP:
0
Average:
2.2
Voting Attendance Rate (%)
-16% below average
This MP:
63.6
Average:
75.6
Important Context
- - Ministers answer questions rather than asking them, so have different activity patterns
- - Activity quantity doesn't measure quality or effectiveness of representation
- - Some MPs focus more on constituency work than parliamentary questions
- - Newly elected MPs will have less parliamentary history
About This Page
This page tracks Mark Francois's parliamentary activity including questions asked, debates (Commons Chamber + Westminster Hall), statements/bills, and petitions presented.