Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministerial Statement

International Update

12 October 2026 · 90 other contributors

Opened by Andy Burnham Labour (Co-op) Leigh

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Andy Burnham raised concerns about international update in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • Andy Burnham delivered a statement on the United Nations General Assembly and related international events.
  • He highlighted the UK's commitment to supporting Ukraine and responding to Russian attacks with additional funding and sanctions.
  • Burnham discussed the UK's partnership with Germany and Italy in the Global Combat Air project.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Government Statement

Andy Burnham, the Labour Member for Leigh, delivered a statement on the United Nations General Assembly and related international events. He highlighted the UK's commitment to upholding international values and supporting Ukraine, emphasising the intensification of Russian attacks on civilians and the UK's response with additional funding and sanctions. Burnham also discussed the energy ceasefire proposal, NATO commitments, and the UK's partnership with Germany and Italy in the Global Combat Air Programme. He addressed the UK's support for Saudi Arabia, condemning attacks on civilians, and the need for enhanced protective security measures. Additionally, he mentioned the UK's response to hybrid threats and plans to establish a centre for information defence. Burnham also addressed the UK-EU summit scheduled for 20 November, outlining potential deals that could boost the UK economy and control illegal immigration. He emphasised the need for a rational and pragmatic approach to the UK-EU relationship, aiming to secure a positive outcome at the summit. Beyond Europe, Burnham highlighted the UK's readiness to lead in global forums, particularly with AI safety during the G20 presidency in 2027.

Other contributors (90)
  • Kemi Badenoch Con Saffron Walden

    Question

    Badenoch questioned whether the Prime Minister was aware of threats from Iran before his Foreign Secretary met with the Iranian Foreign Minister at the UN. She also asked about the US withdrawal of bombers from RAF Fairford and its implications for British aircraft and personnel safety.

    Minister reply

    The minister responded to the questions regarding the US withdrawal from RAF Fairford, stating that it is highly likely that the incident at RAF Fairford was coordinated in Iran, almost certainly directed by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. He emphasised the UK's commitment to cracking down on Iran’s use of criminal networks and bringing further sanctions to restrict Iran's capacity to do harm.

  • Kemi Badenoch Con Saffron Walden

    Question

    Badenoch inquired about the exact timeline for the approval of licences for the Jackdaw gas field and Rosebank oilfield, given the looming global energy crisis.

    Minister reply

    The minister did not provide a specific timeline for the approval of licences but acknowledged the urgency of the matter and the need for timely action in addressing the global energy crisis.

  • Kemi Badenoch Con Saffron Walden

    Question

    Asked the Prime Minister about the focus on Brexit given current economic challenges, questioning the renegotiation of the deal and the Prime Minister's stance on Russian interference in the 2016 referendum. Also raised concerns about delays in the spending review and procurement delays in the defence sector. Questioned the reasons for US bombers withdrawing from RAF Fairford and the decision to meet with the Iranian Foreign Minister.

    Minister reply

    Emphasised the need to address cost of living pressures and took action to remove VAT from electricity bills. Stressed the importance of maintaining strong defence alliances and meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister. Acknowledged Russian interference in the 2019 general election but denied implying illegitimacy of the Brexit referendum result. Defended the Government's record on defence spending and criticised the Labour Party for not addressing issues left behind by the previous government.

  • Emily Thornberry Lab Islington South and Finsbury

    Question

    Asked for assurances that the new centre for information defence would be publicly accountable and scrutinised by Parliament, particularly by the Foreign Affairs Committee.

    Minister reply

    Gave assurances that the centre would be publicly accountable and scrutinised by Parliament, especially the Foreign Affairs Committee. Emphasised the importance of not repeating past mistakes in addressing foreign interference and ensuring Britain is well-prepared for future challenges.

  • Edward Leigh Con Gainsborough

    Question

    Proposed a statement for the Prime Minister regarding his intentions to focus on bread-and-butter issues while being wary of reopening the Brexit debate.

    Minister reply

    Stated that he would take a pragmatic approach to boost economic growth and cooperation on issues like channel crossings. Emphasised the opportunity presented by the current deal to support the food industry and farmers and promote stronger economic growth.

  • Tan Dhesi Lab Slough

    Question

    Welcomes the Prime Minister’s statement and inquires about discussions with US and European allies regarding continued support for Ukraine, amidst concerns over the US lifting sanctions on Russian diesel and its implications for Ukraine.

    Minister reply

    The Minister acknowledges the importance of continued support for Ukraine and mentions discussions with President Zelensky and the Chancellor of the Exchequer with the US Treasury Secretary regarding the energy ceasefire proposal, which aims to get fuel flowing into the market while protecting Ukraine through winter.

  • Edward Davey Lib Dem Kingston and Surbiton

    Question

    Offers condolences for the loss of the Prime Minister’s father and discusses the need to address the negative consequences of the Brexit deal, urging the Prime Minister to open negotiations on joining the single market and a customs union, and to condemn Trump’s diesel deal with Russia.

    Minister reply

    The Minister agrees that the Brexit deal has caused harm and expresses willingness to secure a better deal for the country but is not prepared to revisit the red lines set out in their manifesto. He also mentions ongoing discussions with Chancellor Merz about a meeting of the coalition of the willing.

  • Liam Byrne Lab Birmingham, Hodge Hill

    Question

    Compliments the Prime Minister's start on the world stage and inquires about the Prime Minister's right to introduce new tariffs on unfairly subsidised imports from China to provide a fair and level playing field for British and European businesses.

    Minister reply

    The Minister acknowledges the need to remove red tape and agrees that the 'Made in Europe' proposals pose risks to British manufacturing, especially in the automotive industry. He emphasises the importance of addressing unfair competition from China together with the EU.

  • Andrew Mitchell Con Sutton Coldfield

    Question

    Inquires about the Prime Minister's international agenda, urging focus on the humanitarian situation in Darfur, Sudan, and suggests supporting constitutional negotiations in Yemen.

    Minister reply

    The Minister assures that ending the suffering in Sudan is a high priority for the Foreign Secretary, and that they are providing support to Saudi Arabia while addressing the aggression from the Houthis. He also defends the stance taken regarding Israel and Palestine, emphasising the need to preserve the two-state solution.

  • Nick Thomas-Symonds Lab Torfaen

    Question

    Highlights agreements made during negotiations with Commissioner Šefčovič, including the re-accession of the UK to Erasmus+, food and drink agreement, and an emissions trading scheme linkage, urging anyone who opposes the deal to be in favour of adding costs to businesses and households.

    Minister reply

    The Minister commends the excellent work done to lay the groundwork for the deal and emphasises the importance of relieving pressure on British business in these circumstances.

  • Esther McVey Con Tatton

    Question

    Asks whether the Prime Minister plans to honour the Brexit referendum outcome or overturn it either partially or fully.

    Minister reply

    The Minister commits to honouring the result of the referendum and securing a better deal for Britain, while emphasising the need to lead and set out options for Britain to consider.

  • Stella Creasy Lab Walthamstow

    Question

    Asks the Prime Minister to assure her and her constituents that he will not repeat previous Conservative Government mistakes and will put the national interest first by seeking data and working with Europe.

    Minister reply

    The minister acknowledges the loss of immigration control due to the inability to access data across the EU and emphasises the importance of supporting the British position in the negotiation.

  • Question

    Welcomes the Foreign Secretary’s speech on Sudan and questions the Prime Minister's stance on Sheikh Mansour, who owns Manchester City FC and is linked to conflict and humanitarian crises in Sudan.

    Minister reply

    The minister confirms that the Foreign Secretary is clear that they want a humanitarian solution in Sudan without fear or favour and that all dealings with the owners of Manchester City will be published.

  • Question

    Welcomes the Prime Minister’s statement and questions him about the diesel deal between President Trump and Russia, which is funding Putin's war machine and harming Ukrainian children.

    Minister reply

    The minister assures the MP that Britain will take the strongest possible approach towards sanctions on Russia and recently announced new sanctions on the shadow fleet, crypto, and oil companies in Russia.

  • Julian Lewis Con New Forest East

    Question

    Asks the Prime Minister to explain how Russia was able to alter the result of the referendum.

    Minister reply

    The minister clarifies that he did not say that Russia altered the result and emphasises that Russia has sought to interfere in elections.

  • Bill Esterson Lab Sefton Central

    Question

    Asks the Prime Minister to remind President Trump that high diesel prices are due to issues in the Strait of Hormuz and Iran and not the war between Russia and Ukraine.

    Minister reply

    The minister assures the MP that they are using their good offices on every front to ensure a solution on the cost of energy and discusses the need for a reciprocal ceasefire in Ukraine.

  • Oliver Dowden Con Hertsmere

    Question

    Asks the Prime Minister for a robust response to Iran's attempts to attack British bases and for enhanced support to allies under attack from Iran and its proxies.

    Minister reply

    The minister assures the MP that they are providing a robust response and have introduced a tough sanctions regime in consultation with counterparts in the US.

  • Question

    Asks the Prime Minister to agree that championing British manufacturing on the international stage can secure more work and jobs for communities.

    Minister reply

    The minister pays tribute to the MP for his work in securing an investment of £1 billion for 29 new battery-electric trains at Alstom in Litchurch Lane.

  • Question

    Asks the Prime Minister to listen to the Liberal Democrat call for an international AI safety institute based on the International Atomic Energy Agency in the UK.

    Minister reply

    The minister acknowledges the establishment of the AI Security Institute under the previous Conservative Prime Minister and emphasises the need for a global code of standards and principles for AI.

  • Alex Sobel Lab Leeds North West

    Question

    Asks the Prime Minister for additional support for Kyiv in terms of generators, solar panels, thermal batteries, and other humanitarian support to ensure they can get through the winter.

    Minister reply

    The minister acknowledges the MP's support for Ukraine and confirms that the Foreign Secretary was in Ukraine last week discussing these very issues.

  • Roger Gale Con North Thanet

    Question

    I am quite sure that the whole House will applaud the Prime Minister’s reaffirmation of this country’s support for Ukraine and will support the additional sanctions that we are seeking to impose. President Trump has effectively driven a coach and horses through those sanctions, has torn up the bill that he himself signed in the White House and, for the sake of his domestic audience, is seeking to blame President Zelensky and Ukraine for the oil shortages that the United States is now facing, rather than placing that blame where it truly lies, which is with his disastrous expedition in Iran. The Prime Minister did not answer the question from the leader of the Liberal Democrats. Will he answer it now? Will he join my right hon. Friend the Leader of the Opposition in unequivocally condemning this act of treachery by the President of the United States?

    Minister reply

    I made it clear in my statement that, when I heard the news, I was immediately on the phone to President Zelensky to offer any help that I could provide. I think that where Britain can best provide help is in trying to bring people back together to get a solution that works for Ukraine. More than anything in these circumstances, we have to think about what will be most helpful. Of course, it is critical to get the US, as we discussed in New York with President Trump, back to the concept of an energy ceasefire, and that is what he announced yesterday.

  • Jonathan Hinder Con Pendle and Clitheroe

    Question

    My constituents in Pendle and Clitheroe want immigration to be controlled and managed in the best interests of the country, and I know that the Prime Minister’s constituents in Wigan feel the same. Can he confirm that, as long as he is Prime Minister, there will be no return to freedom of movement?

    Minister reply

    I take my responsibilities to my constituents very seriously, which is why I have said consistently that the manifesto upon which Labour Members were elected will be fully respected. What we have to look at are the options that are available for the long-term relationship. In the next decade, this country needs to know where it is going. There are no assumptions here, and as I said in my opening comments, the British public will be the boss of whatever is decided.

  • Kirsty Blackman SNP Aberdeen North

    Question

    The Prime Minister says that, when it comes to the relationship with the EU, the British public will be the boss. Given that Scotland last had a vote on whether or not to stay in broken Brexit Britain before Brexit was even on the cards, does he not think it is a wee bit cheeky to give the UK public the choice, the driving seat and the reins on whether or not to have a different future with the EU while refusing that same choice to Scotland on its future with the UK?

    Minister reply

    I am sure that, like me, the hon. Lady looks at opinion polls from all parts of the country, including Scotland. No one in this House today is proposing a referendum.

  • Anneliese Dodds Lab Oxford East

    Question

    I also was pleased to hear what the Prime Minister had to say about AI, both in New York and this afternoon in the Chamber. Can he confirm that it remains his view that decisions about global principles and standards for AI should be taken by democratically elected Governments representing working people and not by industry alone?

    Minister reply

    I agree with my right hon. Friend very forcefully. I am setting up a process under the banner of the G20 presidency that mirrors what this country did in 2008, when international agreement was needed about how to handle the financial crisis. The Canadian Prime Minister, who was very much involved at that time, has been in discussions with me about how we could create a process to mirror that for AI so that individual countries could go back and embed those principles in their own laws and statutes. That is what we are trying to achieve. I would be really pleased if the whole House would get behind this endeavour, as the UK is in the global spotlight.

  • Question

    The so-called energy ceasefire is a farce. All but one of Ukraine’s oil refineries has already been destroyed. It is about protecting Russia’s oil refineries while Russia bombs Ukraine’s power grid into obliteration and it results in a health disaster. Will the Prime Minister commit to sending large-scale generators to Ukraine now, and will he stand by our Saudi allies at the UN Security Council and under chapter VII designate the Houthis as a terrorist organisation—yes or no?

    Minister reply

    On the first part of the hon. Lady’s question, I heard her strong view on the energy ceasefire, but I heard from the President on Saturday afternoon and he was asking the UK Government to press for such a ceasefire. I think it is right that we hear him and do everything within our power. As I said, there has been some progress on that front in the last 24 hours. On the second matter, I will reflect on what the hon. Lady said and come back to her.

  • Melanie Onn Lab Great Grimsby

    Question

    Traders at Grimsby Seafood Village will welcome any action to reduce the Brexit red tape and bring down their energy bills. I think that they would also want to hear the Prime Minister say explicitly—he danced around in his response to my hon. Friend the Member for Pendle and Clitheroe (Jonathan Hinder) earlier—that there will not be a return to freedom of movement and that in these negotiations we will not have to capitulate and join the euro?

    Minister reply

    As I have said many times this afternoon, we will honour the manifesto in full. The red lines are in place and they will remain in place. The seafood purveyors of Grimsby will probably have noticed, when I was talking about their plight and the difficulties they face, the lack of support for them from the Conservative Benches. I think the Conservatives need to have a period of reflection on their approach on this whole matter and do something to help British businesses that are struggling right now.

  • Question

    The Prime Minister confirmed that the incident at RAF Fairford was likely to have been co-ordinated in Iran. Can he comment on the serious suggestions that some of those who have been arrested and then bailed had Iranian diplomatic immunity?

    Minister reply

    I hope the hon. Gentleman will understand that I am not going to get into those matters on the Floor of the House. The Home Secretary will make a statement later today and provide more detail.

  • Rupa Huq Lab Ealing Central and Acton

    Question

    From catching “Pride” at the National Theatre to jamming the Smiths with Ukrainian troops, we know that this Prime Minister gets culture. Can he revisit pragmatically the Tory mess that has left the Really Useful Group, a theatre group, touring a production of “Phantom of the Opera” in Europe with a Chinese cast because of all the red tape and musicians crippled by costs with no cabotage agreements, because it is killing gigs and venues?

    Minister reply

    I say to my hon. Friend that those are precisely the issues that we believe need a second look. We need to take a more pragmatic approach, and my right hon. Friend the Minister for Intergovernmental Relations and European Relations is having those discussions with Europe. We do want to see better arrangements for our British creative industries, because they deserve it. They are the best in the world and Europe wants to see and hear more from them.

  • Simon Hoare Con North Dorset

    Question

    Irrespective of how we voted in the referendum, I hope the Prime Minister will agree that if one wants to be called a democrat, one has to abide by that decision and make it work, but the Windsor framework illustrates that no deal is ever cast into tablets of stone and that things are capable of sensible evolution. Will the Prime Minister accept that at this time, as always, businesses large and small, urban and rural, need certainty? They need to know the regulatory regime in which they are trading, the opportunities that exist and the barriers that they may need to overcome. Will he commit that, whatever evolution he is envisaging, it will be delivered speedily to be able to give confidence, certainty and clarity to North Dorset businesses and those across the country?

    Minister reply

    I commend the hon. Gentleman on his pragmatic tone. He is absolutely right to approach it in that way. When I visit Northern Ireland, as I do, I hear a call for things to be changed and improved—evolved, as he said—and that is exactly right. I said in my statement that the energy cost-benefit for Northern Ireland could be significant: there could be up to a 20% reduction in wholesale energy costs. Why would I not do everything I could to deliver that for the people of Northern Ireland? He mentioned speed. If the whole House gets behind the drive to improve the deal, we will get it through more quickly.

  • Question

    I thank the Prime Minister for his statement and for highlighting the effect of Brexit on the salmon farming industry. Salmon farming is worth £189 million to the Western Isles, with £34 million of that direct, and over 200 jobs. Similarly, fishing is worth £16 million, with most of that prawn exports to Spain and France. We are physically furthest from that EU market, but we need that deal—we need to get our fish and our produce in. While we are at it, let us get a deal for our young people to get them studying and working again in Europe.

    Minister reply

    My hon. Friend puts it so well, because he knows these issues so well—because of the travel times to market. If only Opposition Members had the level of understanding he has just demonstrated, we would be in a better place.

  • Question

    I note the Prime Minister’s remarks concerning Russian interference in some recent and not so recent elections, which raise serious questions for all of us who worry about the integrity of our democracy. Will the Prime Minister commit to reviewing whether campaign finance rules—both those in place at the moment and the welcome but limited steps being introduced in the Representation of the People Bill—sufficiently guard against foreign interference through political donations? In particular, may I encourage him to look at a cap on political donations to limit the influence of ultra-wealthy individuals and potential foreign interests?

    Minister reply

    My right hon. Friend the First Secretary of State is leading a task and finish group on cleaning up politics, and I am sure that she would be very pleased to hear from the hon. Member on her proposals.

  • Cat Smith Lab Lancaster and Fleetwood

    Question

    On 26 October 2021, when the Conservative Government’s Elections Bill was going through its Public Bill Committee, I was the shadow Minister, and I tabled a new clause relating to foreign interference in politics. The Minister then responsible for keeping our democracy safe replied in Committee that she had not read the Russia report and asked me to explain it to her. Does the Prime Minister share my concern that the Minister, now Leader of the Opposition, may not be fully across the details?

    Minister reply

    I was not aware of that, but I am aware that the Russia report says that “written evidence provided to us appeared to suggest that HMG”— I think that was Her Majesty’s Government at the time— “had not seen or sought evidence of successful interference in UK democratic processes”. That is indefensible. This Government will not make that mistake. We will ensure that we defend British democracy in the next decade as it was not defended in the last.

  • Caroline Dinenage Con Gosport

    Question

    On illegal immigration, the Prime Minister will be aware that in the last month, three boats have left Normandy bound for the Solent and the south coast. The Government are giving France £662 million, yet the smugglers have simply moved down the coast. On 4 October, nearly 150 people landed in Gosport, against the will of local people and of the local council and against the safety advice of the police and crime commissioner. This sends a message to these evil people-smuggling gangs that this is now a viable new route. Given that no one from the Home Office had the courtesy to contact me before, during or after those 150 people were landed on the shores of my constituency, could the Prime Minister let me know what conversations are happening with France to try to shut down these routes from Normandy?

    Minister reply

    I will look into what the hon. Lady just said about not being informed, because if—well, I am sure it is true, and it is not good enough. We will seek to ensure that the Home Office improve on that, because these are difficult issues and I know that they were difficult issues as they were presented in her constituency. The answer is almost in what she said: we are working closely with the French, and it is precisely because of the success of that co-operation that the gangs are changing their tactics—obviously, she has seen the effect of that—but we will be relentless in changing ours to make sure they do not succeed. We will look at the issues that she mentioned and we will endeavour to ensure there is no repeat, but it is precisely because we are succeeding in reducing the number of boat crossings that they are having to try different routes.

  • Question

    I welcome the Prime Minister’s commitment to strengthening relations with our European neighbours. Can I give him one example of how he can boost economic growth by doing just that on the south coast? Thousands of the people I represent have called for international trains to come back to Ashford International. It would boost our economy by £2.7 billion and bring half a million more visitors to Sussex and Kent every year, and we have an international terminal sitting there ready to be used. It is a no-brainer, so will the Prime Minister give me his commitment that he will support this, like the Transport Secretary?

    Minister reply

    My hon. Friend makes an excellent case. She and I will ask the Transport Secretary to look into it and get back to her.

  • Question

    I welcome the Prime Minister’s commitment to the new national centre for information defence. It is a critical factor in preserving the integrity of our democracy, but he will be aware that the US State Department intends to spend tens of millions of pounds promoting ideological propaganda and supporting far-right parties in western Europe, potentially including the UK. Will he give the House the assurance that the new national centre will be free to go where it needs to go, without fear or favour, in investigating misinformation and disinformation, and that, where necessary, that will include the activities of the United States?

    Minister reply

    Indeed; I will give the hon. Gentleman that assurance here and now. That is exactly the point: it should be free to do that, and with independent oversight, as the Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, my right hon. Friend the Member for Islington South and Finsbury (Emily Thornberry), said. Let us remember, the Russian Government spend over £1 billion every year on misinformation and disinformation, and we have to be open-eyed about that and start to respond accordingly. It is not about a ministry of truth, or whatever people want to say; it is about ensuring people are aware of what is being done, and where there is interference in our democratic process. It will be more successful if it carries the full support of all sides of the House, with the requisite independence and oversight.

  • Question

    I thank the Prime Minister for his statement. It is an absolute no-brainer that we move closer to our closest trading partner, the EU, and I know that thousands of businesses in my constituency of Monmouthshire will welcome the reduction in costs. I am sure that Monmouthshire farmers, too, will be delighted that they were at the centre of his statement, as they will be by the prospect of less red tape and lower costs when dealing with the EU. They were sold a lie by the Conservatives about Brexit. Can the PM confirm that Welsh lamb and Welsh beef exports will increase as a result of his statement and of the renegotiation with the EU?

    Minister reply

    Not as a result of the statement—if only I had that power—but yes, if we can secure the deal that I talked about in the statement. This is a really important moment for British farmers, who have had a very difficult year, and it is incumbent on me to do everything that I can. I can assure them—and my hon. Friend can assure them, because she heard it from me—that I will do everything that I possibly can to get this deal over the line in the next five weeks.

  • Nigel Huddleston Con Mid Worcestershire

    Question

    The Prime Minister has adopted a fascinating negotiating strategy by revealing his hand and goals in advance of any discussions with the EU. Is he aware that the price of any deal therefore went up with every word that he said? As a former Trade Minister, may I also advise the Prime Minister—because his officials and Ministers clearly have not—that it may not be so easy after all, because of some of the clauses in the 70-plus other trade deals that we did with other countries to unwind all the things that he would like to do? It may not be as simple as he thinks.

    Minister reply

    May I just reflect on the negotiating geniuses on the other side of the House, whose main strategy, as far as I recall, was insulting every member of the European Commission and every member state? That went well, didn’t it?

  • Question

    I congratulate the Prime Minister on his strong leadership at the UN and in preparing to host the G20. As a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee, I welcome the national centre for information defence. On the EU, we need to boost opportunities for our hospitality, accommodation and tech sectors; they are the ones that talk about the great opportunities for young people to study, work and live here and—for people in my constituency—to travel to Europe as well. I therefore welcome talk of a work experience scheme being discussed at the EU summit. Will the Prime Minister say more about whether that scheme will lead to a youth mobility scheme, which would boost growth in this country?

    Minister reply

    That will be very much part of the discussion at the summit, and I believe that that, too, is in our interests. If young people come here to study, they develop an attachment to the country, which often bodes well for us, for the rest of their lives, as do British students going the other way. These are the things that worked in the past, and there is no reason why this generation should not be able to take advantage of them. I welcome my hon. Friend’s generous support for what we are trying to do.

  • Question

    I congratulate the hon. Member for Holborn and St Pancras (Sagal Abdi-Wali), who was with us here earlier, and warmly welcome her to her place in this House. I also warmly welcome much of what the Prime Minister’s international update contained, particularly his recognition of Brexit’s disastrous effects on our country—as far as I am concerned, the faster we move to rejoin, the better—but there was no mention of the climate crisis. Does he not recognise that the climate crisis is one of the biggest international challenges facing us, that it requires us to keep fossil fuels in the ground, and that therefore—given that COP31 is coming up next month—the Government must rule out Jackdaw and Rosebank, and move with all speed to the future of clean, green, renewable energy on which this country’s future prosperity depends?

    Minister reply

    I thank the hon. Lady for welcoming what I had to say. On the climate crisis, I can assure her that I was not silent in my speech to the UN General Assembly; indeed, the Foreign Secretary convened climate crisis-related events in New York. As I have said before, we will be pragmatic on oil and gas, given that the country will continue to need to use them in the future, but where we agree is that it is essential that this country builds the strongest possible bridge to a renewable future.

  • Question

    Last week, one of the food production companies in my constituency contacted my office regarding an import of fish from the European Union which has been held at Suffolk Coastal Port Health Authority because of a labelling discrepancy. Delay and potential refusal of entry have significant financial implications for the business, with storage and associated costs continuing to accumulate while the container remains at port with the increasing likelihood that the stock will have to be destroyed as time goes on. May I ask for the Prime Minister’s reassurance that closer ties with Europe will make it easier for local businesses to import and export to the European Union?

    Minister reply

    One can only imagine the frustration of the businesses that are trying to get that produce released. The Minister for Europe just said to me, “We get calls like this all the time.” Why was there such indifference on the other side of the House to this situation? Why are we not working towards a pragmatic solution to get British goods flowing to market? I do not think the other side’s position is sustainable, and the example my hon. Friend has just given, speaking up for businesses in her constituency, is one that the vast majority of people would say, “Right, get that fixed” and we will.

  • Lincoln Jopp Con Hemel Hempstead

    Question

    The Prime Minister, can you make it crystal clear to the world that you have no higher priority than the national security of the United Kingdom?

    Minister reply

    National security is my highest priority and the Government's highest priority. Resilience builds from the community level up, and we also have to have an eye to the resilience of our communities in a very changing world.

  • Chris Webb Con Blackpool South

    Question

    Does the Prime Minister believe that the UK-EU summit is the perfect opportunity to deliver real benefits for Blackpool businesses and families, including lowering food prices and further immigration controls?

    Minister reply

    One of the most positive aspects of my meeting with President von der Leyen was her openness to the conversation about restoring data sharing on immigration. I will work hard to see if we can get a practical arrangement on that very issue at the summit in November.

  • Robbie Moore Con Hertsmere

    Question

    Can the Prime Minister comment on the concerns raised by CropLife UK regarding the alignment of the UK’s crop protection rules with the EU?

    Minister reply

    The National Farmers Union is very strongly in support of this proposed deal. I will listen to what he has got to say and if he sends me the report, I will take a look at it.

  • Mark Sewards Con North Herefordshire

    Question

    Will the Prime Minister set out his view on the Falkland Islands and their right to determine where their resources go?

    Minister reply

    We have consistently demonstrated our unwavering support for the Falkland Islanders and indeed for the Sea Lion project. We will say more in due course.

  • Ian Roome Con Great Yarmouth

    Question

    Will the Prime Minister differentiate between the criminal investigations into the recent incidents at RAF bases and say what measures the Government are taking to establish whether other military bases face similar vulnerabilities?

    Minister reply

    British police and security services have done everything that they should have done. We are confident in the way that we are managing the security of our bases, but we are not complacent and we will do everything necessary to secure them.

  • Alex Baker Con Wells

    Question

    Will the Prime Minister take political leadership to ensure that Britain is at the forefront of building the financial power needed to deter our adversaries?

    Minister reply

    I have had discussions with the Canadian Prime Minister on that very subject. We are looking at how we can pursue procurement co-operation more broadly.

  • David Reed Con Stroud

    Question

    For the avoidance of doubt, will the Prime Minister confirm which country was responsible for the Jaguar Land Rover hack and if there have been any repercussions?

    Minister reply

    I will write to the hon. Gentleman.

  • Patricia Ferguson Lab Cowdenbeath

    Question

    Will the Prime Minister consider the opportunities to advance the cause of industries affected by Brexit at the EU summit?

    Minister reply

    I am looking forward to visiting Scotland later this week and I hope to have those discussions.

  • Mark Pritchard Con The Wrekin

    Question

    Will the Prime Minister work with the Defence Secretary and the Chancellor on defence planning and a defence budget should the UK need to do more for Ukraine?

    Minister reply

    Britain will remain at the heart of NATO and we will continue to do whatever we need to do. We are still the third biggest contributor to NATO and sometimes that point is missed.

  • Sarah Russell Con Watford

    Question

    Will the Prime Minister confirm that long-term commitment to Erasmus and the youth mobility scheme will be prioritised in discussions with the EU?

    Minister reply

    I can give my hon. Friend that assurance. The youth mobility component of the deal matters as much to me as the other parts.

  • Jeremy Corbyn Lab Islington North

    Question

    What discussions took place about the future of the UN, the proper funding of the UN, and the reform of the Security Council and the General Assembly?

    Minister reply

    I met the Secretary-General of the United Nations in New York. Britain will play its part in providing the support that the UN needs, ensuring that the UN’s standing rises in these times.

  • Question

    The Putin tax—the cost of Russian cyber and physical attacks on the UK—is costing the British taxpayer about £2.5 billion each year. My office conducted research over the summer, but we were unable to find a great deal of information about the true cost of Russian hostile activity because the Government do not collect that information. Will the Prime Minister commit the Government to collecting more of that information and to publishing it on a regular basis, so that the public know the true cost to the UK taxpayer of Vladimir Putin’s aggression?

    Minister reply

    That was a topic of conversation with Chancellor Merz in our meeting in Berlin last week. The cyber-attacks that both Germany and the UK face are multiple and pose serious risks for British businesses. That is why we have launched a new partnership on hybrid attacks. I agree with my hon. Friend about the importance of monitoring the data, and I will see what more we can do on that.

  • Graham Stuart Con Beverley and Holderness

    Question

    I thank the Prime Minister for his statement and his commitment to being more straightforward with the House than perhaps has always been the case over the last couple of years. In the light of that, will he give the House an unequivocal assurance that he believes that the Brexit referendum was legitimate? Will he say so on the record?

    Minister reply

    I will very much say so on the record: it was legitimate. I have always respected the result, and I have never questioned its legitimacy, but I am within my rights to point out where foreign actors are looking to interfere in British democracy.

  • Question

    The last 10 years of poor Brexit deals have taken a toll on our businesses and economy, including on a lot of small and medium-sized enterprises in my constituency that are looking to grow. We all want less red tape for business and frictionless trade with our largest trading partners, so can the Prime Minister seek a deal that opens up possibilities for my breweries, farmers and manufacturers to help them grow?

    Minister reply

    If we get to a deal and it does not do all the things that my hon. Friend just mentioned, it will not be the right deal. I know that I will be in a stronger position the more that people in all parties in the House get behind what I am saying. That will put Britain in the strongest place to negotiate a deal. That would be a good negotiating strategy, and maybe the Opposition will consider it.

  • Question

    The whole House will have noted that when the Prime Minister was asked about freedom of movement, he evaded the question. May I ask him directly—it is a simple yes or no—to say that in any future negotiation on rejoining the EU, freedom of movement will not be on the table?

    Minister reply

    The hon. Gentleman is getting way ahead of himself. There is no proposal for a referendum; there is no deal on the table. All I have said is that, as we go towards this negotiation, it makes sense to consider also our longer-term options, because it helps our European partners if they know where Britain wants to go in the future. That is all that is being said at this moment in time.

  • Question

    Britain has enormous strengths in AI. We attracted almost as much private investment as the EU 27 combined last year, but in an industry dominated by the United States and China, it is only by co-operating with our friends in Europe that we can achieve the scale necessary to keep ourselves safe and to thrive. Does the Prime Minister agree that a technology partnership is one of the ways in which we could rebuild our relationship with the EU?

    Minister reply

    That is an excellent thought, and that is exactly what we may be able to strengthen as part of our G20 presidency year. I point my hon. Friend towards the actions of the AI Minister, who has regained access to US AI frontier models for the AI Security Institute. That shows that we are in a good position to broker new standards on AI across the world and make arrangements with all our partners.

  • Ben Lake PC Ceredigion

    Question

    I commend the Prime Minister for his statement and specifically for his acknowledgment of the significant harm that Brexit has wrought on our communities. I welcome his desire for a serious conversation about the long-term relationship with the European Union. Does he agree that for any dialogue to be serious, it has to include a the full range of options, including membership of the customs union, the single market and possibly the European Union?

    Minister reply

    I am pleased that the hon. Gentleman is taking an open-minded approach. At this stage, as we look to move beyond the decade that was not the best for Britain—let us be honest about that—it is right that we have a discussion in the House about where we want to go and where we want to take this country in the next decade. Let us be clearer about our direction in the next decade than we were in the last. That is what I will try to bring as Prime Minister for this country. I am not going to turn away from questions just because they might be awkward or difficult. That is what has got us into this position. We have turned away from things that we should have dealt with. I am not going to do that. I appreciate the spirit that the hon. Gentleman is showing today. That is what the country needs as we go forward.

  • Question

    I congratulate the Prime Minister on the work that he is doing with allies to promote resolution to conflicts around the world, particularly in the middle east and Ukraine. Nevertheless, my constituents remain extremely anxious about the effect of the situation in the strait of Hormuz on their fuel bills, going into what will probably be a difficult winter. Can the Prime Minister provide reassurance that he will try to protect the most vulnerable from increases in energy bills going forward, and will also continue our acceleration away from dependence on fossil fuels and further towards renewables, so that we are less open to energy price shocks in the future?

    Minister reply

    I can assure my hon. Friend that reducing the cost of energy is a core priority of this Government, as I said at the conference in Liverpool just over a week ago. I have already removed VAT from electricity bills; there is more to come, and we will set that out soon.

  • Question

    If the Prime Minister is so keen to support our farmers, there is one step he could take that is entirely within his control, which is to scrap the family farm tax. Will he do so, and show a genuine commitment to our farmers?

    Minister reply

    As the hon. Lady knows, changes have been made, but that is not the only issue affecting British farming, which is why I have made the statement I have made today.

  • Question

    The Prime Minister loves his music, as does Rob, a constituent of mine who is a member of the Musicians’ Union. He welcomed the Government’s plan for music, “Turn It Up”, and its support for local venues, but that plan is quiet about what the future relationship with Europe will look like when it comes to touring. With 59% of musicians saying that EU touring is no longer viable, will the Prime Minister commit to putting visa waivers for this specific purpose on the table on 20 November?

    Minister reply

    Let me be plain: I would like to see the return of visa-free access to Europe for British musicians and performers.

  • Question

    On 28 September, Javier Milei initiated annex VII arbitration proceedings against the United Kingdom in relation to halting activities at the Sea Lion oilfield. That deadline expired yesterday, and I assume that we have not complied. The Government have already said that they would robustly defend the Falkland Islands against this, which is great. Javier Milei will now initiate proceedings under the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. I agree that we should push back against this. However, last May, the former Defence Secretary, the right hon. Member for Rawmarsh and Conisbrough (John Healey), said from the Dispatch Box that the “most proximate, and the most potentially serious” legal challenge facing us about the Chagos islands was “the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.”—[Official Report, 22 May 2025; Vol. 767, c. 1291.] Why are we prepared to defend the Falkland Islands against ITLOS, but not the Chagos islands?

    Minister reply

    I have been very clear this afternoon that we will defend the Falkland Islands, and I reiterated that to the Falkland Islands’ Government at our recent conference. I did discuss the matter of the Chagos islands in New York, and particularly the crucial need to secure the future of our base at Diego Garcia. I can assure the hon. Gentleman that that is what we will do.

  • Question

    Many of my younger constituents feel that their horizons have been shortened and their opportunities limited by the restrictions on their ability to travel, study and work in Europe, post Brexit. They simply want the same opportunities that were available to the generations before them. Does the Prime Minister agree that, through a new youth experience scheme, they should get those opportunities?

    Minister reply

    I believe that this generation, which has so much potential and so much promise, deserves the same thing that so many of us took for granted, which is the ability to travel and study in Europe with ease. That is why, as I said a moment ago, the youth mobility component of the proposed deal matters greatly to me.

  • Robert Jenrick Con Newark

    Question

    We now know that Iran has targeted bases on our soil. We already knew that Iranian agents who had been charged with terrorism offences entered the United Kingdom on small boats, so will the Prime Minister do what Reform UK would do—declare a national security emergency, because we have a gaping hole in our borders right now, send the Royal Navy into the channel, and shut down the entire asylum farce, once and for all—to truly fulfil his duty as Prime Minister, which is to keep the British people safe?

    Minister reply

    I can remember a time when the right hon. Gentleman stood up in this House and made serious proposals—sadly, not today. If he had checked the facts recently, he would have seen that small boat crossings are coming down under this Government. When he was Immigration Minister, what did they do? They went up and up. Those are the facts; he should engage with them.

  • Christopher Vince Con Harlow

    Question

    Paid tribute to Jean Clark, a former Harlow councillor, and asked the Prime Minister to confirm that his focus is on improving the deal for businesses in Harlow, not a rerun of the Brexit referendum or negotiations.

    Minister reply

    Acknowledged the tribute to Jean Clark and stated that the focus is on getting a pragmatic arrangement to improve the situation for businesses in Harlow.

  • Patrick Spencer Con St Ives

    Question

    Asked for clarity on the Prime Minister's position regarding defence spending and welfare, and questioned whether the Prime Minister would consider taking Britain back into Europe unilaterally.

    Minister reply

    Clarified that there would be no unilateral move to take Britain back into Europe.

  • Peter Swallow Con Bracknell

    Question

    Urged the Prime Minister to take a pragmatic position ahead of the EU summit in November, emphasising the need for a closer relationship with Europe and a better deal for the British people.

    Minister reply

    Confirmed the intention to steer the negotiations towards a successful conclusion.

  • Wera Hobhouse Lib Dem Bath

    Question

    Asked the Prime Minister to outline his ambition for negotiating cuts to the red tape and paperwork for businesses across the board, particularly for small businesses in Bath.

    Minister reply

    Stated that the deal is on the table for specific sectors and that landing this deal points to future improvements.

  • Euan Stainbank Lab Evelyn

    Question

    Asked about the Prime Minister's assurance that the Government is prepared to act to harmonise our approach on Chinese imports in order to secure exemptions from 'Made in Europe' for vehicle manufacturers.

    Minister reply

    Commited to common cause with Europe on tackling Chinese exports and their effect on British industry.

  • Aphra Brandreth Con Waveney

    Question

    Asked for assurance regarding the continuation of intelligence co-operation with Israel despite recent tensions.

    Minister reply

    Confirmed that intelligence and security co-operation with Israel continues despite differences on other issues.

  • Brian Leishman SNP Dumfries and Galloway

    Question

    Asked the Prime Minister to come to Grangemouth to listen to local people affected by Syngenta’s Chinese owners closing down vital Scottish industries and to commit to spending £200 million from the National Wealth Fund.

    Minister reply

    Commited to visiting Grangemouth as soon as possible to address the issues.

  • Sorcha Eastwood DUP Lagan Valley

    Question

    Asked for assurance that the Prime Minister is in live discussions with the Northern Ireland Executive to ensure the best possible deal for Northern Ireland.

    Minister reply

    Stated the intent to work with the Northern Ireland Executive to deliver a real change for constituents.

  • Jerome Mayhew Lab Ealing, Southall

    Question

    Asked the Prime Minister to rule out a return to freedom of movement in any negotiations with the EU.

    Minister reply

    Stated that freedom of movement is not on the table or up for discussion.

  • Jim Allister TUV North Antrim

    Question

    Asked whether the Prime Minister views himself as the Prime Minister of Britain or the United Kingdom, and questioned the sanitary and phytosanitary deal’s impact on Northern Ireland.

    Minister reply

    Confirmed that the deal will reduce checks in the Irish Sea and benefit Northern Ireland in relation to energy.

  • Kieran Mullan Lab Luton North

    Question

    Asked the Prime Minister to rule out taking Britain back into freedom of movement while he is Prime Minister.

    Minister reply

    Reiterated the commitment to the red lines in the manifesto that include freedom of movement not being on the table.

  • Luke Taylor Con East Riding of Yorkshire

    Question

    Welcomed the Labour party’s recent adoption of Liberal Democrat policy priorities and asked about the Government’s position on strengthening integration with Canada, New Zealand and Australia.

    Minister reply

    Commited to the importance of the English-speaking world uniting and forging new partnerships.

  • Luke Evans Con Wentworth and Dearne

    Question

    Asked about the Prime Minister's position on new oil and gas licences for the Falkland Islands.

    Minister reply

    Commited to defending the Falkland Islanders' right to self-determination and their right to drill for oil and gas.

  • Chris Law SNP Dundee West

    Question

    The Prime Minister, as a proud Unionist, will be acutely aware that despite Scotland voting overwhelmingly to remain in the EU, it was dragged out against its will because it is part of the United Kingdom. Since then, support for Scottish independence has only risen. Two thirds of the last 22 independent polls show support for independence, the Scottish Parliament has the highest majority ever of pro-independence MSPs, and it voted 72 to 55 in favour of a section 30 agreement for a referendum on Scotland’s future. In the Prime Minister’s own words to me last month, a “clear consensus” has now been met, so I ask him a simple question: what steps is he now taking with the Scottish Government to secure a legal pathway so that Scotland can decide its own future and rejoin the EU?

    Minister reply

    The discussions that I am having with the Scottish Government and will have later this month are on a model of deeper devolution for Scotland that can get growth going in all parts of the country. That is where my priority lies and that is what I will do.

  • Question

    I welcome the Prime Minister’s clarification that he believes that the UK referendum was legitimate. The Intelligence and Security Committee recommended six years ago that the UK intelligence community should produce an assessment of Russian interference in the EU referendum, and that an unclassified summary be published. That did not happen. Why does the Prime Minister think that his predecessors have been so reluctant to speak about Russian attempts to interfere in the referendum?

    Minister reply

    The hon. Gentleman might want to ask the right hon. Member for Newark (Robert Jenrick), sitting to his left, because the Russia report from the ISC found that Her Majesty’s Government had not sought evidence. Those are the facts as found by the Committee, and those are matters and questions for that Government rather than this one.

  • Question

    The Prime Minister has told this House repeatedly about the involvement of Russian authorities in our democratic process, and the fact that they are willing to spend millions and millions of pounds to interfere in our democratic process. Given that, does the Prime Minister concur with me that photo identification at polling stations during elections is not just important, but an absolute necessity?

    Minister reply

    I would say that we do want to uphold the highest standards of security in our voting system, but the Bill before the House does that, as well as allowing more people the ability to vote.

  • Question

    Today was a very sad day for my residents in Mid Dorset and North Poole, with the very last sailing of the Barfleur from Poole to her twin town of Cherbourg in France after 34 years of continuous trade, and this is blamed on Brexit red tape, food export restrictions and travel limitations on people who can travel only for 90 in 180 days. Will the Prime Minister please ask his officials to do all they can to keep open the window of opportunity to keep this going, and make sure that the issue of UK ports and their role is included in the UK-EU summit?

    Minister reply

    The hon. Lady raises a really important point, and the Minister for Europe has just said that he is willing to meet her to discuss it, because it is a real shame, given that level of history. But again, that is why we are trying to negotiate a better arrangement. We will do exactly as she says, and look at how what we are trying to achieve could benefit British ports.

  • Question

    Talk of an energy ceasefire shows once again how central energy security is to national security, so will the Prime Minister reassure the House that the rumoured cuts to the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero budget will not undermine his Government’s ability to protect our critical energy infrastructure, or indeed to protect our constituents from the high energy bills that undermine society’s cohesion?

    Minister reply

    I say to the hon. Lady that protecting our critical national infrastructure and our energy infrastructure is a crucial part of national security. It is the essence of the deal—the partnership—we struck with Germany last week, and we will ensure that there is sufficient funding to achieve that via the Ministry of Defence and, indeed, DESNZ.

  • Question

    The EU asylum and migration pact ticks all the Prime Minister’s boxes in bringing control and safety to the asylum system, and it is cheaper than the bilateral agreements that his Government are making with France and Belgium, so why is it not on the agenda for his Government?

    Minister reply

    I am happy to look at what the hon. Gentleman is saying if he writes to me in detail on that very matter.

  • Kit Malthouse Con North West Hampshire

    Question

    During the last couple of hours, I have heard the Prime Minister talk about three of the four pillars of our national defence—our military, our resilience and our alliances—but he has yet to mention the crucial fourth pillar, which is the importance of the international rules-based order and the institutions that underpin it. Is he going to take any active steps to defend the International Criminal Court and the UK citizens who work there against the American sanctions that have been placed on it?

    Minister reply

    Obviously, we are looking at the decisions that have been reached in relation to that very issue, and we will of course defend any British citizens who have been unfairly treated.

  • Question

    I have listened carefully to what the Prime Minister has had to say, and I am very grateful to him. Would he agree with me that in our international affairs we must do all we can to support the BBC World Service, which is the voice of this country to the world—the voice of truth and facts?

    Minister reply

    Indeed. I am a very big supporter of the World Service, and indeed of the BBC as a whole.

  • Question

    Will the Prime Minister state categorically that he is in no way considering a May 2027 general election?

    Minister reply

    Yes.

  • Question

    The US President’s disastrous war in the middle east has massively driven up the price of liquified petroleum gas and heating oil in my rural constituency. Pensioners and struggling families will be forced to leave their heating off, risking their health. As reducing bills is the Prime Minister’s stated priority, will he please consider removing VAT from heating oil and LPG, and include them in the energy price cap?

    Minister reply

    I understand the point the hon. Gentleman is making. Obviously, different parts of the UK are more dependent on heating oil and that issue has really come to the fore throughout the course of this year, so I will consider what he has to say.

  • Andrew Rosindell Con Romford

    Question

    I know that the people of the Falkland Islands will be reassured by the Prime Minister telling President Trump and the UN General Assembly that the clear and declared will of the islands is to remain British, but will he please afford the same rights to the people of the Chagos islands? Surely, all citizens of overseas territories should have the right of self-determination and the right to stay British.

    Minister reply

    We will certainly uphold our obligations in respect of the Falklands Islands. As the hon. Gentleman knows, the issues related to the Chagos islands are different—they are not strictly comparable—but we will always take the right and fair approach.

  • Question

    The Prime Minister is confident that close ties with the EU will deliver growth, but what evidence can he provide to this House that this will translate into tangible improvements for the communities that felt left behind by globalisation and then voted for Brexit? Does he accept that we have a duty to respect that democratic decision, and that reopening this deeply divisive debate must be justified by clear measurable benefits that could not be achieved otherwise outside the European Union?

    Minister reply

    The clear measurable benefits are containers and lorries full of fresh produce not sitting at ports and going off. That is a clear and measurable benefit to a business, as is extra several billion pound-sized growth in the UK economy. I would not be pursuing this were there not tangible differences for British business at the end of it. The figures are from the Treasury. They quantify an increase of at least 0.2% in UK GDP if we get the right deal, possibly more, and that is worth pursuing at this moment in time.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Question

    Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker—my legs are the strongest in the Chamber, without a doubt. Closer alignment with Brussels has caused great alarm in Strangford and across Northern Ireland. If the Government’s idea of a reset with Europe involves further alignment, will the Prime Minister explicitly state today whether he intends permanently to lock Northern Ireland into foreign laws under an unelected European court, or will he finally take a hard line to fully restore the Acts of Union and the internal market of the United Kingdom, as we should have had from the start? “All together or not at all” must be the message.

    Minister reply

    I understand what the hon. Gentleman is saying, but I did not negotiate the arrangement that is currently in place. What I am trying to do is make things better for the people of Northern Ireland. I am confident in saying to him that if we get the right deal on energy connection, that could make an appreciable difference for his constituents, as could the paperwork on Irish sea crossings as well. There are real benefits that I can achieve here that will improve things for Northern Ireland—possibly not to his complete satisfaction, but they are steps forward.

Shadow Comment

Kemi Badenoch

Kemi Badenoch, Conservative Member for Saffron Walden, responded to Burnham's statement by criticising the government's approach to the current economic challenges and the attempt to reopen Brexit debates. She pointed out the black hole in public finances and the lack of effective solutions to immediate issues such as energy prices and household bills. Badenoch questioned the legitimacy of the referendum result and criticised the delay in the defence spending review. She raised concerns about the US withdrawal from RAF Fairford and the UK's decision-making process regarding energy licences. Badenoch urged the government to focus on cutting welfare, funding defence, drilling in the North Sea, reducing taxes, creating jobs, and addressing other pressing issues without relying on speculative promises.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy