Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Criminal Proceedings (Juror Absence)

22 April 2026 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Sally Jameson Labour (Co-op) Doncaster Central

Justice & Courts

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Sally Jameson raised concerns about criminal proceedings (juror absence) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Bill proposed to prevent criminal proceedings from being adjourned if at least nine jurors remain
  • Emphasized the importance of fairness and efficiency in the judicial system
  • Highlighted case where court delays impacted victims' access to justice

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Sally Jameson Labour (Co-op) Doncaster Central

Introduced a Bill proposing that criminal proceedings should not be adjourned solely due to the absence or discharge of a juror if there are at least nine jurors remaining. She highlighted a case where court delays prevented victims from getting justice, emphasising the need for fairness and efficiency in the judicial system.

Other contributors (1)
  • Sally Jameson

    Introduced a Bill proposing that criminal proceedings should not be adjourned solely due to the absence or discharge of a juror if there are at least nine jurors remaining. She highlighted a case where court delays prevented victims from getting justice, emphasising the need for fairness and efficiency in the judicial system.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy